Please support our Tech Talk advertiser:
Dec 26th, 2006, 7:43 pm
Endless beta testing does still not guarantee a bug-free program, as Microsoft found out a few weeks ago. Recently, a major flaw was discovered by a Russian programmer, in Windows Vista that was released to businesses earlier this month.
This particular flaw allows a user with standard user system priviliges to gain access to restricted tools without a administrator's permission. This is of course only through physical access, but it's still a major flaw. Another one also present was a bug in Internet Explorer 7 that allowed hackers to install code into the client just by simply visiting their site.
Microsoft has been made aware of the problem, and is fixing it. Fortunately for them, this version of Vista has only been sold to corporations and beta testers, so they don't have to worry about making consumers aware of the flaw.
The problem with these flaws is not that bugs don't happen; they of course happen to the best of programmers. The problem is that Microsoft has spent 5 and a half years developing Vista, and a huge amount of that time was beta testing. Now, although it's nice to try to get the program as bug-free as you can before releasing it, there's a point where you have to release it, bugs and all.
If we spent all our time fixing bugs, we wouldn't be able to code any new features, and most important the consumer gets delayed. By now, the suprise of Vista is spoiled. We've been seeing screenshots all year long, people giving reviews of it, and having it released to corporations already.
Interestingly enough, the way Microsoft developed Vista is contrary to the way they normally write software, quickly releasing the software and then allowing the consumers to bug-test the software. Windows XP was pretty much released this way, and look how successful it worked. Microsoft should have realized that that method worked for them. They key to experimenting is to find what works for you. Apple tends to release its software with very little software bugs, however they don't allow a whole lot of publicity in the beta-testing stage, often releasing software/hardware without any prior notice.
Microsoft should not do this. For some reason, their software is bug-prone initially. So what? Just get it out, and the major bugs will soon be exposed ready to be fixed. Me? I highly doubt that Vista will fail, but it will likely take some time until people buy new computers, getting Vista included with it. And by that time, Vista will probably be bug-free, but not in the way that Microsoft intends.
This particular flaw allows a user with standard user system priviliges to gain access to restricted tools without a administrator's permission. This is of course only through physical access, but it's still a major flaw. Another one also present was a bug in Internet Explorer 7 that allowed hackers to install code into the client just by simply visiting their site.
Microsoft has been made aware of the problem, and is fixing it. Fortunately for them, this version of Vista has only been sold to corporations and beta testers, so they don't have to worry about making consumers aware of the flaw.
The problem with these flaws is not that bugs don't happen; they of course happen to the best of programmers. The problem is that Microsoft has spent 5 and a half years developing Vista, and a huge amount of that time was beta testing. Now, although it's nice to try to get the program as bug-free as you can before releasing it, there's a point where you have to release it, bugs and all.
If we spent all our time fixing bugs, we wouldn't be able to code any new features, and most important the consumer gets delayed. By now, the suprise of Vista is spoiled. We've been seeing screenshots all year long, people giving reviews of it, and having it released to corporations already.
Interestingly enough, the way Microsoft developed Vista is contrary to the way they normally write software, quickly releasing the software and then allowing the consumers to bug-test the software. Windows XP was pretty much released this way, and look how successful it worked. Microsoft should have realized that that method worked for them. They key to experimenting is to find what works for you. Apple tends to release its software with very little software bugs, however they don't allow a whole lot of publicity in the beta-testing stage, often releasing software/hardware without any prior notice.
Microsoft should not do this. For some reason, their software is bug-prone initially. So what? Just get it out, and the major bugs will soon be exposed ready to be fixed. Me? I highly doubt that Vista will fail, but it will likely take some time until people buy new computers, getting Vista included with it. And by that time, Vista will probably be bug-free, but not in the way that Microsoft intends.
This blog entry was written by John Altenmueller, staff writer aka John A. It has received 2,784 views, 5 comments, and 37 linkbacks. 3 voters have rated this entry an average of 3.33 out of 5 stars. It was promoted to featured status Dec 28th, 2006.
•
•
•
•
apple ballmer bill gates business computer console dell desktop development drm firefox games gaming google hardware ibm icahn internet iphone ipod linux merger microsoft mobile mozilla news novell office operating os pc red hat safari search security server silverlight software sp1 system technology ubuntu upgrade vista web windows xbox 360 xp yahoo yang
All Recent Tags Comments (Newest First)
Riv3n | Junior Poster in Training | Jan 3rd, 2007
•
•
•
•
Bugs are gonna be in any software release no matter how long the beta testing is.
Microsoft is just delaying the inevitable.
Security Patch, Security Patch, Security Patch.
Microsoft is just delaying the inevitable.
Security Patch, Security Patch, Security Patch.
jwenting | duckman | Dec 30th, 2006
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
It's true that xp worked great the way it was released, but you have to understand that Microsoft is always trying to find ways of doing things, whether they're succesful or not.
As any company wanting to stay in business should. It's called innovation.
TheNNS | Nearly a Posting Virtuoso | Dec 29th, 2006
•
•
•
•
It's true that we know what Vista will be like. But we're IT people, not the average person. The average person doesn't care much aobut Microsoft, Apple, or any body, they just want a computer to do what they usually do. Most of the people who I help with their problems don't really know what their running, and they don't care.
It's true that xp worked great the way it was released, but you have to understand that Microsoft is always trying to find ways of doing things, whether they're succesful or not.
That flaw you mentioned, with the administrative priviliges messed up, it's wasn't going to affect the average user if it was released, because people don't care.
I agree with every thing else though, good blog.
It's true that xp worked great the way it was released, but you have to understand that Microsoft is always trying to find ways of doing things, whether they're succesful or not.
That flaw you mentioned, with the administrative priviliges messed up, it's wasn't going to affect the average user if it was released, because people don't care.
I agree with every thing else though, good blog.
John A | Vampire Moderator | Dec 29th, 2006
jwenting | duckman | Dec 29th, 2006
•
•
•
•
Bug-free programs of more than a few lines don't exist.
But from the entire tone of your rant it seems you don't care about the truth, only about kicking Microsoft in the shins...
But from the entire tone of your rant it seems you don't care about the truth, only about kicking Microsoft in the shins...
Post Comment
•
•
•
•
Only community members can start a blog or comment on blog entries. You must register or log in to contribute.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
DaniWeb Tech Talk Marketplace
Related Blog Entries
- Guild Wars 2: In-House FAQ (13 Hours Ago)
- Intel To Focus on Devices, Again (1 Day Ago)
- 5-4-3-2-1 your website in infected (2 Days Ago)
- Apple ships 2.5 million Macs, sells 11 million iPods and 717,000 iPhones in just 3 months (3 Days Ago)
- Limbo 2 Trojan comes complete with guarantee of invisibility (3 Days Ago)
- More Dark Spots on Apple's MobileMe Migration (3 Days Ago)
- Power-Sipping PC Runs Linux (4 Days Ago)
- Fake UPS invoices deliver Pushdo botnet package (5 Days Ago)
- Crystal Ball Sunday #8: Virtual Appliances (5 Days Ago)
- How to put in a new motherboard without losing your Operating System (8 Days Ago)
Related Forum Threads
- Will you upgrade hardware for Vista? (Windows Vista)
- Vista graphic upgrade problem ???? (Windows Vista)
- Uninstalling Vista Home Upgrade (Windows Vista)
- Vista Final has officially hit. which version are you getting? (Windows Vista)
- Omfg Vista Is So Expensive (Windows Vista)
- 1GB RAM Upgrade, PC wont boot? (Motherboards, CPUs and RAM)
- Windows Vista video games (Windows Vista)
Featured Entry
Exactly. So Microsoft shouldn't prolong the beta testing of Vista, because now Vista has lost some of its novelty. So many screenshots of it are posted on blogs, it only makes people mad when Microsoft delays it...