Please support our Tech Talk advertiser:
Jan 6th, 2007, 7:58 pm
Hitachi has now announced a 1-terabyte internal hard drive, claiming they're the first to unveil a 1 terabyte hard drive in the industry. It doesn't sound terribly impressive, given the fact that storage mediums are increasing faster than you can blink an eye.
However, they have done quite a feat if you look more closely. For one, the pricing is very attractive. This hard drive costs a mere $399, cheaper than a lot of smaller-capicitated portable hard drives. This makes it quite inexpensive to get the huge amounts of storage, which will especially attract server-storage people.
Secondly, they have made this the size of a regular hard drive. Any PC can be upgraded to this drive, simply by swapping out the old one with the Hitachi version, because Hitachi used the industry-standard, IDE connections. IDE looks like it is gradually getting replaced with Serial ATA, a faster technology, so look for a SATA-compatible 1 TB drive from Hitachi in the future.
It may seem like Hitachi is not the first to create a 1 TB drive. The hard drive manufacturer LaCie has been creating portable 1 TB drives for a while already. However, that was not truly a 1 TB drive, as it was simply two 500 GB drives in one case. Hitachi managed to get a whole terabyte into a regular drive, essentially doubling the drive's density when compared to the LaCie drive.
Hitachi's timing was perfect - right before the consumer electronics show.
Making a move like this is exciting, but it will not likely be picked up by the mainstream customers yet. Call me old-fashioned if you want, but I barely need more than 10 gigabytes for my data. This drive is 100 times larger than that. However, I can see it useful in servers, where IDE controllers are at a minimum. This drive might be their answer.
One thing that has not been mentioned is actual performance. Sure, almost any data size is achievable, provided you have enough room for it. But what about the speed of the drive? And how reliable will it be in the long-term? These questions are more likely to be asked by the type of people who need them most, that is the server and storage-folk, who cannot afford to lose data. This question can only be answered by test of time.
However, they have done quite a feat if you look more closely. For one, the pricing is very attractive. This hard drive costs a mere $399, cheaper than a lot of smaller-capicitated portable hard drives. This makes it quite inexpensive to get the huge amounts of storage, which will especially attract server-storage people.
Secondly, they have made this the size of a regular hard drive. Any PC can be upgraded to this drive, simply by swapping out the old one with the Hitachi version, because Hitachi used the industry-standard, IDE connections. IDE looks like it is gradually getting replaced with Serial ATA, a faster technology, so look for a SATA-compatible 1 TB drive from Hitachi in the future.
It may seem like Hitachi is not the first to create a 1 TB drive. The hard drive manufacturer LaCie has been creating portable 1 TB drives for a while already. However, that was not truly a 1 TB drive, as it was simply two 500 GB drives in one case. Hitachi managed to get a whole terabyte into a regular drive, essentially doubling the drive's density when compared to the LaCie drive.
Hitachi's timing was perfect - right before the consumer electronics show.
Making a move like this is exciting, but it will not likely be picked up by the mainstream customers yet. Call me old-fashioned if you want, but I barely need more than 10 gigabytes for my data. This drive is 100 times larger than that. However, I can see it useful in servers, where IDE controllers are at a minimum. This drive might be their answer.
One thing that has not been mentioned is actual performance. Sure, almost any data size is achievable, provided you have enough room for it. But what about the speed of the drive? And how reliable will it be in the long-term? These questions are more likely to be asked by the type of people who need them most, that is the server and storage-folk, who cannot afford to lose data. This question can only be answered by test of time.
This blog entry was written by John Altenmueller, staff writer aka John A. It has received 2,588 views, 5 comments, and 18 linkbacks. 2 voters have rated this entry an average of 4.5 out of 5 stars. It was promoted to featured status Jan 7th, 2007.
•
•
•
•
access advice blackmail business code combo cult of the dead cow daniweb data database drive dropdownlist encryption europe f1 forensic forensics fun gadget gmail google hacking hard hardware help hitachi hp industrial espionage information it mail mobile module net news nobel prize privacy protection reuse search security spot storage terabyte tutorials and more tv web wikipedia yahoo
All Recent Tags Comments (Newest First)
happygeek | He's The Daddy | Jan 8th, 2007
•
•
•
•
Sometimes you have to take the initiative and help create a market.
Although I agree that most consumers are not in dire need of this amount of storage, plenty soon will be as the 'PC as media centre' concept continues to get a grip. Streaming video, digital photography, MP3 jukeboxes all require hefty storage requirements and I think that Hitachi is showing a commitment to meet them both now and in the future.
This is a good thing, IMHO, and much preferable to the storage folk sitting back and not bothering to push the technical boundaries.
Although I agree that most consumers are not in dire need of this amount of storage, plenty soon will be as the 'PC as media centre' concept continues to get a grip. Streaming video, digital photography, MP3 jukeboxes all require hefty storage requirements and I think that Hitachi is showing a commitment to meet them both now and in the future.
This is a good thing, IMHO, and much preferable to the storage folk sitting back and not bothering to push the technical boundaries.
cscgal | The Queen of DaniWeb | Jan 7th, 2007
•
•
•
•
I'm confused who the targeted audience for this drive is. As you say, consumers aren't really in dire need of a terabyte of storage right now, and high end people and people with servers are going to want more than the slow IDE connection when things like SATA and SCSI are available.
blud | Linux Reject | Jan 7th, 2007
•
•
•
•
Currently I have 1.5 Terabyte on my home PC, I look forward to one of these new TeraByte drives to add to my PC :cheesy:
jbennet | Microsoft Fanboy | Jan 7th, 2007
•
•
•
•
yes Visual Studio, XP and office etc.... come to like 20gb on my machine
jwenting | duckman | Jan 7th, 2007
•
•
•
•
1TB may sound like a lot now, but I still remember buying my first PC in 1992 and people declaring me crazy for opting to get one with a 40MB drive.
"You'll never need that much space" was the most common criticism.
10GB these days is nothing. When I spent a day photographing an airshow last summer I ended up with 7GB of photos in just a few hours.
And that's the raw data, once processed that became roughly 70GB.
"You'll never need that much space" was the most common criticism.
10GB these days is nothing. When I spent a day photographing an airshow last summer I ended up with 7GB of photos in just a few hours.
And that's the raw data, once processed that became roughly 70GB.
Post Comment
•
•
•
•
Only community members can start a blog or comment on blog entries. You must register or log in to contribute.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
DaniWeb Tech Talk Marketplace
Related Blog Entries
- Guild Wars 2: In-House FAQ (13 Hours Ago)
- Intel To Focus on Devices, Again (1 Day Ago)
- 5-4-3-2-1 your website in infected (2 Days Ago)
- Apple ships 2.5 million Macs, sells 11 million iPods and 717,000 iPhones in just 3 months (3 Days Ago)
- Limbo 2 Trojan comes complete with guarantee of invisibility (3 Days Ago)
- More Dark Spots on Apple's MobileMe Migration (4 Days Ago)
- Power-Sipping PC Runs Linux (4 Days Ago)
- Fake UPS invoices deliver Pushdo botnet package (5 Days Ago)
- Crystal Ball Sunday #8: Virtual Appliances (5 Days Ago)
- How to put in a new motherboard without losing your Operating System (8 Days Ago)
Related Forum Threads
- Huge problems with Tiger and firewire drives (OS X)
- Value Hard Drives (Storage)
- Win 2k doesn't open my cd-drives. (Windows NT / 2000 / XP / 2003)
- Windows can't see my additional hard drives (Windows 9x / Me)
- windows me hangs with usb drives (Windows 9x / Me)
Featured Entry