•
•
•
•
What is DaniWeb IT Discussion Community?
You're currently browsing the Tech Talk category of DaniWeb, a massive community of 397,679 software developers, web developers, Internet marketers, and tech gurus who are all enthusiastic about making contacts, networking, and learning from each other. In fact, there are 2,493 IT professionals currently interacting right now! Registration is free, only takes a minute and lets you enjoy all of the interactive features of the site.
Please support our Tech Talk advertiser:
Mar 4th, 2007, 8:24 pm
If you've been keeping up to the news, you'll likely be aware of the fact that Vista's activation code scheme for anti-piracy has been cracked by using a brute-force method, allowing any pirates to download Vista and just let the cracking program do its work.
I find this insanely ironic. Microsoft's little plan for ensuring that everyone will buy a legal copy of Vista completely backfired. Now this wouldn't be so bad if it stopped here. Windows XP was highly pirated, and yet it doesn't seem to have hurt Microsoft too much. No. The real problem here for Microsoft is that this method finds legal keys from copies of Vista that haven't yet been activated (and now won't, if the cracker decides to use the key before the person).
I've said this before, and I say it again: anti-piracy methods are counter productive. It prevents a few users from ilegally-copying the software, but the results are far worse. The pirates always find cracks for the software (and I mean ALWAYS), and instead it inconveniences the legal owners who may simply want to run their video game without the CD in the drive.
And so Microsoft gets what they deserve. Now, not only will they have the problem of piracy on thier hands, but, as the article explains, Microsoft will have to deal with the angry people who can't activate their software because the key "is invalid". Or, like the article describes, they could offer trade-ins for the keys, but that would also backfire for them. Microsoft's in a dilemma, no doubt about that.
Serves them darn right, and not a minute too soon.
I find this insanely ironic. Microsoft's little plan for ensuring that everyone will buy a legal copy of Vista completely backfired. Now this wouldn't be so bad if it stopped here. Windows XP was highly pirated, and yet it doesn't seem to have hurt Microsoft too much. No. The real problem here for Microsoft is that this method finds legal keys from copies of Vista that haven't yet been activated (and now won't, if the cracker decides to use the key before the person).
I've said this before, and I say it again: anti-piracy methods are counter productive. It prevents a few users from ilegally-copying the software, but the results are far worse. The pirates always find cracks for the software (and I mean ALWAYS), and instead it inconveniences the legal owners who may simply want to run their video game without the CD in the drive.
And so Microsoft gets what they deserve. Now, not only will they have the problem of piracy on thier hands, but, as the article explains, Microsoft will have to deal with the angry people who can't activate their software because the key "is invalid". Or, like the article describes, they could offer trade-ins for the keys, but that would also backfire for them. Microsoft's in a dilemma, no doubt about that.
Serves them darn right, and not a minute too soon.
This blog entry was written by John Altenmueller, staff writer aka John A. It has received 4,311 views, 2 comments, and 26 linkbacks. 3 voters have rated this entry an average of 3.33 out of 5 stars.
•
•
•
•
advertising ajax apple ballmer bill gates business code computer console development facebook firefox flash games gaming google hardware ibm icahn ie8 linux merger microsoft mobile news novell office open source operating os pc red hat search security server silverlight software source sp1 system technology upgrade vista web windows xbox 360 xp yahoo yang
All Recent Tags Comments (Newest First)
jwenting | duckman | Mar 4th, 2007
•
•
•
•
Apple doesn't need to worry because there's no way to get a Mac without MacOs...
There are millions of computers out there however that can run Windows and get sold or built without a Windows license (including all those Macs since a few years).
Piracy protection is absolutely vital. Not only does a company loose all rights to their intellectual property if they don't protect it, it also prevents the majority of at least casual piracy.
You'll never stop the pros, but at least you're going to get rid of kids giving each other copies of their discs they got for their birthdays.
The ONLY people who state that protecting your property against criminals is useless are those criminals, who want to create an easier working environment for themselves.
Anyone else is smart enough to realise you should lock your door when you leave your house even if a determined burglar will find a way to open that lock.
There are millions of computers out there however that can run Windows and get sold or built without a Windows license (including all those Macs since a few years).
Piracy protection is absolutely vital. Not only does a company loose all rights to their intellectual property if they don't protect it, it also prevents the majority of at least casual piracy.
You'll never stop the pros, but at least you're going to get rid of kids giving each other copies of their discs they got for their birthdays.
The ONLY people who state that protecting your property against criminals is useless are those criminals, who want to create an easier working environment for themselves.
Anyone else is smart enough to realise you should lock your door when you leave your house even if a determined burglar will find a way to open that lock.
TheNNS | Nearly a Posting Virtuoso | Mar 4th, 2007
•
•
•
•
I agree with you. When you look at mac os x, apple doesn't require its users to activate it, it never has, and they don't really have piracy problems. I guess apple ins't as big, so they don't need to worry about it, and if they were, they would start adding some activation to their products, so it's not all ms's fault.
Post Comment
•
•
•
•
Only community members can start a blog or comment on blog entries. You must register or log in to contribute.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
DaniWeb Tech Talk Marketplace
Related Blog Entries
- It's True -- Some People Want You Kept in the Dark (15 Hours Ago)
- Virtual physios to soothe stroke recovery (1 Day Ago)
- AMDS Gloomy Future. (1 Day Ago)
- Don't Allow Security Breaches to Rip Your Britches (3 Days Ago)
- Internet Speed Tests Provide Misleading Results (4 Days Ago)
- Microsoft's Photosynth Will Fail (4 Days Ago)
- Swedes test faultless iPhone 3G and surprisingly find no faults (4 Days Ago)
- Redhat and Fedora Servers breached (5 Days Ago)
- Charge Your Laptop Without Plugging In: Intel (7 Days Ago)
- As Palm Releases Treo Pro, Its Future May Rely on One (7 Days Ago)
Related Forum Threads
- Help hal.dll not found or corrupt (Windows NT / 2000 / XP / 2003)
- windows xp activation (Windows NT / 2000 / XP / 2003)
- Vista Crack Means Big Trouble (Windows Vista)
- Is it possible to install a separate copy of windows? (Windows NT / 2000 / XP / 2003)
- Anti-piracy systems....... (Visual Basic 4 / 5 / 6)
- Booting problem (Windows NT / 2000 / XP / 2003)
- New motherboard (Motherboards, CPUs and RAM)
- Upgrade to Panther Problem (OS X)