Please support our IT Water Cooler advertiser: Affiliate Marketing
May 6th, 2007, 7:29 pm
The constant worry of soldiers leaking top-secret information onto the internet via blogs had forced the commanders to approve every blog entry that a soldier wrote before they could post it onto the world wide web. Fortunately for them it's called off, at least for now.
Just 3 days ago, a fact sheet had been released that said it wasn't going to be done, and that soldiers aren't going to be watched or monitored when they write to their online journals: "No way every blog post/update a solider makes on his or her blog needs to be monitored or first approved by an immediate supervisor and operations security officer."
The soldiers in question are instead going to be educated on what is and isn't appropriate to post online. The fact sheet states: "this regulation places trust in the solider, civilian employee, family member and contractor that they will use proper judgment to ensure operations security." The irony of this whole thing is that even if the soldiers were monitored for everything that they posted publicly, they could just as easily leak it to a contact via email who could then spread it willy-nilly online. No point in penalizing the honest guys; good move by the person(s) who wrote this fact sheet.
Just 3 days ago, a fact sheet had been released that said it wasn't going to be done, and that soldiers aren't going to be watched or monitored when they write to their online journals: "No way every blog post/update a solider makes on his or her blog needs to be monitored or first approved by an immediate supervisor and operations security officer."
The soldiers in question are instead going to be educated on what is and isn't appropriate to post online. The fact sheet states: "this regulation places trust in the solider, civilian employee, family member and contractor that they will use proper judgment to ensure operations security." The irony of this whole thing is that even if the soldiers were monitored for everything that they posted publicly, they could just as easily leak it to a contact via email who could then spread it willy-nilly online. No point in penalizing the honest guys; good move by the person(s) who wrote this fact sheet.
This blog entry was written by John Altenmueller, staff writer aka John A. It has received 1,709 views, 4 comments, and 8 linkbacks. 3 voters have rated this entry an average of 4.67 out of 5 stars. It was promoted to featured status May 6th, 2007.
•
•
•
•
apple bbc blog broadband business cable conspiticy daniweb development domains download explorer firefox funds google government ie7 internet investments ip ipv6 isp jbennet laptop linux malware microsoft money network networking news online p2p porn portfolio research security serunson sex software statistics stocks study terrorism usenet vista web wifi windows
All Recent Tags Comments (Newest First)
ft3ssgeek | Junior Poster | Aug 25th, 2007
•
•
•
•
As the LAN administrator of a US Nuclear Submarine, I was privy to the monitoring of e-mails to and from the sailors based aboard the ship. I can tell you without reservation that while a person may believe that what they are writing or saying is completely harmless he or she may let something slip that should not be released. This monitoring is not only for the protection of national security but also for the protection of the military members themselves. It is my personal opinion that policy of monitoring blogs should have remained in place. As a member of the US Military you KNOWINGLY suborn some of your rights. The Military regularly trains its troops on information security but you still have drunk/horny/pissed off troops letting things loose.
cutepinkbunnies | Junior Poster in Training | May 7th, 2007
•
•
•
•
One of my friends had his blog shut down becuase of this rule. He is serving overseas as a Reconnaissance Marine and has had his blog/website up for years without incident.
Its funny how the govt will trust him (as they trust all Recon Marines) enough to drop a $40k+ JDAM on living bodies or other strategical targets he relays into his Command but not enough to blog.
Ironically most cases it isn't the little guys like him that have issues leaking information, its big wig politicians (as seen in recent years) that discuss confidential information to people without the "need to know".
Either way, these politicians and that Marine that gave the blueprints to the KGB agent (years back) are the people we have to pay the price for
Also, to think the DoD doesn't monitor their inbound/oubound traffic in any form is silly (regardless what they say publically). They watch over traffic like a Hawk, especially since belonging to the DoD you actually have less rights than you do as a civilian.
I tolerated this for 4 years which gave me new respect for the rights I do have as a US Citizen but were denied as a US Marine.
Bless those that serve, for they are truly making a sacrafice.
Its funny how the govt will trust him (as they trust all Recon Marines) enough to drop a $40k+ JDAM on living bodies or other strategical targets he relays into his Command but not enough to blog.
Ironically most cases it isn't the little guys like him that have issues leaking information, its big wig politicians (as seen in recent years) that discuss confidential information to people without the "need to know".
Either way, these politicians and that Marine that gave the blueprints to the KGB agent (years back) are the people we have to pay the price for

Also, to think the DoD doesn't monitor their inbound/oubound traffic in any form is silly (regardless what they say publically). They watch over traffic like a Hawk, especially since belonging to the DoD you actually have less rights than you do as a civilian.
I tolerated this for 4 years which gave me new respect for the rights I do have as a US Citizen but were denied as a US Marine.
Bless those that serve, for they are truly making a sacrafice.
John A | Vampire Moderator | May 7th, 2007
cscgal | The Queen of DaniWeb | May 6th, 2007
•
•
•
•
I think that whomever initially came up with the idea doesn't know how blogs work. If they can't trust their soldier to not post in his blog, he shouldn't be privy to top secret information, because he could just as easily say something in real life.
Post Comment
•
•
•
•
Only community members can start a blog or comment on blog entries. You must register or log in to contribute.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
DaniWeb IT Water Cooler Marketplace
Related Blog Entries
- Google Knol's a 'Wiki,' Not a 'Pedia' (11 Hours Ago)
- Much Ado About Apple: What Will it Take to Make Wall Street Happy? (15 Hours Ago)
- Families in UK face curbs over piracy (18 Hours Ago)
- Rampant Apple speculation (2 Days Ago)
- MindTouch Deki: A "Why-Didn't-I-Think-Of-That?" Enterprise Solution (1 Day Ago)
- AT&T Rides iPhone to Rescue (1 Day Ago)
- Oil, Earnings Buck Up Markets, But Clouds Still Ahead (1 Day Ago)
- Moving Headlines in Newspapers? Never! (1 Day Ago)
- Apple: Crazy Like a Fox (2 Days Ago)
- LinkedIn Branches Out with NYT Deal (2 Days Ago)
Related Forum Threads
- Freedom of expression (Geeks' Lounge)
- Getting in w/ the bloggers (Promotion and Marketing Plans)
- Advertise on U.S. Army Game Site! (Ad Space for Sale)
- Happy new Year to All (Geeks' Lounge)
Featured Entry
They've taken the right approach: keep it from happening by educating the soldiers.