Please support our Software Development advertiser:
Sep 10th, 2007, 7:59 am
Qualcomm is best known for two things: making mobile phone chips and owning the once hugely popular Eudora email client software. Or perhaps I should say once owning the once hugely popular Eudora email client software as Qualcomm stopped selling it back in May and handed over the codebase to the open source community. The Beta 1.0 release is now available for download under the new name of Penelope.
Surprisingly this is being developed and distributed under the Mozilla Foundation wing. Surprising because just a couple of months ago the Mozilla CEO was talking up Firefox and talking down Thunderbird, the original Mozilla email client. One wonders how Mozilla will be able to put the kind of effort into developing, distributing and promoting Penelope if it feels that Thunderbird was taking too much organisational focus away from browser development?
"We intend to produce a version of Eudora that is open source and based on Mozilla and Thunderbird. It's not our intention to compete with Thunderbird; rather, we want to complement it." So says a statement at the official Mozilla Penelope website, but it's really very hard to understand how that can be the case. What is the point in splitting the development effort between two email clients, one of which is based in part on the other? Everyone knows that if you dilute beer you end up with a weak and weedy mess, not a better beer.
"It is our goal to build a single development community around Thunderbird and Eudora, so that both mailers advance faster than they previously have." Again, more nonsense from the Mozilla folk, it just does not compute.
Of course, that Eudora codebase is a valuable asset. Unlike Thunderbird which has received mixed reviews over the years, Eudora pretty much always did very well indeed no matter who was reviewing it or the competition it was up against. And for good reason: in its day it really was an innovative and feature packed client. First developed in the late 80's, Eudora quickly became the email software of choice for the Internet baby boomer, and you could could count them in the tens of millions back in the day. But that day would appear to have long since passed though, otherwise you can bet your bottom dollar that Qualcomm would still be selling it, not giving the code away for the open-source community to play with.
I wish Penelope luck, because I was one of those millions of happy Eudora users and would be really happy were it to rise again to such prominence. However, unless Mozilla can sort out where its email development allegiance lays, I cannot see it happening. All I can see is both Thunderbird and Penelope fading into the distance as webmail service such as Gmail continue to flourish…
Surprisingly this is being developed and distributed under the Mozilla Foundation wing. Surprising because just a couple of months ago the Mozilla CEO was talking up Firefox and talking down Thunderbird, the original Mozilla email client. One wonders how Mozilla will be able to put the kind of effort into developing, distributing and promoting Penelope if it feels that Thunderbird was taking too much organisational focus away from browser development?
"We intend to produce a version of Eudora that is open source and based on Mozilla and Thunderbird. It's not our intention to compete with Thunderbird; rather, we want to complement it." So says a statement at the official Mozilla Penelope website, but it's really very hard to understand how that can be the case. What is the point in splitting the development effort between two email clients, one of which is based in part on the other? Everyone knows that if you dilute beer you end up with a weak and weedy mess, not a better beer.
"It is our goal to build a single development community around Thunderbird and Eudora, so that both mailers advance faster than they previously have." Again, more nonsense from the Mozilla folk, it just does not compute.
Of course, that Eudora codebase is a valuable asset. Unlike Thunderbird which has received mixed reviews over the years, Eudora pretty much always did very well indeed no matter who was reviewing it or the competition it was up against. And for good reason: in its day it really was an innovative and feature packed client. First developed in the late 80's, Eudora quickly became the email software of choice for the Internet baby boomer, and you could could count them in the tens of millions back in the day. But that day would appear to have long since passed though, otherwise you can bet your bottom dollar that Qualcomm would still be selling it, not giving the code away for the open-source community to play with.
I wish Penelope luck, because I was one of those millions of happy Eudora users and would be really happy were it to rise again to such prominence. However, unless Mozilla can sort out where its email development allegiance lays, I cannot see it happening. All I can see is both Thunderbird and Penelope fading into the distance as webmail service such as Gmail continue to flourish…
This blog entry was written by Davey Winder, staff writer aka happygeek. It has received 3,276 views, 1 comment, and 34 linkbacks. 2 voters have rated this entry an average of 5 out of 5 stars. It was promoted to featured status Sep 10th, 2007.
•
•
•
•
agplv3 apple botnet browser browsers business daisy development email embedded devices firefox gnu google hardware ibm india itunes leak linux malware memory microsoft mozilla naked news open source openoffice opensolaris phishing red hat saas safari security software solaris spam sun support technology thunderbird trends ubuntu uk.government users via video visa web windows
All Recent Tags Comments (Newest First)
mecrider | Newbie Poster | Sep 10th, 2007
•
•
•
•
Maybe this will become the new nest that Thunderbird has been looking for. That wouldn't bother me if they can get Linux support incorporated. At this point, even though Qualcomm lists Mark Charlebois, a Linux developer/Thunderbird user, as part of their team (and he is listed on addons.mozilla.org as the author of the Penelope extension for Thunderbird), Jeff Beckley says "the team wishes it was, but it's a matter of finding the right help for the job."
Post Comment
•
•
•
•
Only community members can start a blog or comment on blog entries. You must register or log in to contribute.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
DaniWeb Software Development Marketplace
Related Blog Entries
- UK ISPs agree to throttle illegal music file-sharers (19 Hours Ago)
- WikiGoogle or GooglePedia? Nope, it is Knol actually. (1 Day Ago)
- SF Password Hijack Highlights Importance of Process in City, State IT (2 Days Ago)
- Botnets boost click-fraud rate (2 Days Ago)
- Apple ships 2.5 million Macs, sells 11 million iPods and 717,000 iPhones in just 3 months (3 Days Ago)
- Limbo 2 Trojan comes complete with guarantee of invisibility (3 Days Ago)
- Fake UPS invoices deliver Pushdo botnet package (5 Days Ago)
- Security Holes Spring Up in Java Framework (8 Days Ago)
- iPhone 3G: It Was All Yellow (10 Days Ago)
- Consumer electronics revenue to hit $700 billion by 2009 (13 Days Ago)
Related Forum Threads
- how to fix blue screen of death problem (Windows NT / 2000 / XP / 2003)
- recover data after blue screen of death? (Storage)
- Blue Screen of Death on XP (Windows NT / 2000 / XP / 2003)
- C++ is dying a slow death (C++)
- Mozilla, Firefox, Thunderbird, NetScape, IE6 vulnerabilities (Viruses, Spyware and other Nasties)
- blue screen of death (Windows NT / 2000 / XP / 2003)
Featured Entry