Please support our Tech Talk advertiser:
Mar 19th, 2008, 5:15 pm
•
•
•
•
Evening everyone!
As most of you will proberbly already be aware that the first service pack for MS Vista is looming. Although the final version won't be available on MS update until proberbly next month - it is available as a download (roughly about 450Mb) direct from MS.
I decided to go all out and install it on my laptop earlier on, and during the setup it asked me to make sure that I had at least 7.5Gb of free space for the service pack. (Not exactly sure why it requested so much?) The install was pretty much painless although it did take a while and obviously restarted numerous times.
My system seemed to boot a bit quicker after the install, although I've noticed it does slow to a crawl frequently now. I tried to update my Vista experience score just before writing this; and the screen is still loading - something I never had trouble with before.
Although it was only released this week it has been available to manufacturers since early February. As mentioned above; it asked me to check that I had 7.5Gb of free space for the install - so was a little surprised to find that instead of me having less space (as you would typically expect when installing a service pack) I had 3Gb more?!?
Not quite sure why yet; but no doubt someone is bound to know. I'm just hoping that some bright spark at MS has solved the Vista memory leak - didn't have to be a plumber to see that leak! Even though it had just rebooted and I had very little running; the CPU-meter gadget was showing my memory as 60% used!
Looks like they decided to sort out more important things instead - good old Bill's retirement fund for example! Although it's using a lot of memory still - the processor seems to have been given a break; considering that the machine I'm currently using isn't dual-core it's currently below 4% - which in my mind is pretty good.
Still wondering what SP1 actually did though? When it took so long to release it! - Was it hand-coded by children in back-street sweatshops or something? (Actually that's not fair, they proberbly would have done a better job of fixing any of the numerous flaws - and that's coming from a Vista fan!)
Overall; Yes go forth and update if you wish! Just don't expect any wonderful fixes or amazing improvements. Unless you need 3Gb of extra space then I guess it's worth spend 1/4 hr to download it.
Dazza
As most of you will proberbly already be aware that the first service pack for MS Vista is looming. Although the final version won't be available on MS update until proberbly next month - it is available as a download (roughly about 450Mb) direct from MS.
I decided to go all out and install it on my laptop earlier on, and during the setup it asked me to make sure that I had at least 7.5Gb of free space for the service pack. (Not exactly sure why it requested so much?) The install was pretty much painless although it did take a while and obviously restarted numerous times.
My system seemed to boot a bit quicker after the install, although I've noticed it does slow to a crawl frequently now. I tried to update my Vista experience score just before writing this; and the screen is still loading - something I never had trouble with before.
Although it was only released this week it has been available to manufacturers since early February. As mentioned above; it asked me to check that I had 7.5Gb of free space for the install - so was a little surprised to find that instead of me having less space (as you would typically expect when installing a service pack) I had 3Gb more?!?
Not quite sure why yet; but no doubt someone is bound to know. I'm just hoping that some bright spark at MS has solved the Vista memory leak - didn't have to be a plumber to see that leak! Even though it had just rebooted and I had very little running; the CPU-meter gadget was showing my memory as 60% used!
Looks like they decided to sort out more important things instead - good old Bill's retirement fund for example! Although it's using a lot of memory still - the processor seems to have been given a break; considering that the machine I'm currently using isn't dual-core it's currently below 4% - which in my mind is pretty good.
Still wondering what SP1 actually did though? When it took so long to release it! - Was it hand-coded by children in back-street sweatshops or something? (Actually that's not fair, they proberbly would have done a better job of fixing any of the numerous flaws - and that's coming from a Vista fan!)
Overall; Yes go forth and update if you wish! Just don't expect any wonderful fixes or amazing improvements. Unless you need 3Gb of extra space then I guess it's worth spend 1/4 hr to download it.
Dazza

•
•
•
•
activation apple bill gates browser code computer dell desktop development drm gartner google hack hoax install internet itunes key leopard linux mac merger microsoft mobile news novell office open operating operating system os photo product safari security serial server software source sp1 sp3 system technology ubuntu unix upgrade vista windows xp yahoo
All Recent Tags Comments (Newest First)
patelmiteshb | Newbie Poster | Mar 24th, 2008
•
•
•
•
NICE
darrenw89 | Is a digital Jedi | Mar 21st, 2008
scru | Practically a Posting Shark | Mar 21st, 2008
•
•
•
•
It was 67Mb for me. The slow down you are experiencing is the complete wipe of your superfetch records. Also, note that if you had turned off superfetch before, it's turned back on now. Also, would you people *please* stop whining about Vista's alleged "memory leak"? That's like whining about dogs barking...
Anyway, to say the SP1 didn't change or bring much isn't exactly correct. You just missed a lot of it.
And hey, that's not fair! I got a wonderful fix: HBO works in Media Center now!
Anyway, to say the SP1 didn't change or bring much isn't exactly correct. You just missed a lot of it.
And hey, that's not fair! I got a wonderful fix: HBO works in Media Center now!
jbennet | Microsoft Fanboy | Mar 20th, 2008
•
•
•
•
next month?
its on MS update NOW (for me it was the 60-90mb range - the standalone one includes all language packs so is a few hundred)
worked fine on my lenovo laptop - seemes to make general operation and driver support better
only problem was it took AGES to install and my sound drivers and anti-malware needed reinstalling
its on MS update NOW (for me it was the 60-90mb range - the standalone one includes all language packs so is a few hundred)
worked fine on my lenovo laptop - seemes to make general operation and driver support better
only problem was it took AGES to install and my sound drivers and anti-malware needed reinstalling
Post Comment
•
•
•
•
DaniWeb Marketplace (Sponsored Links)
Related Blog Entries
- Chinese quake should not threaten Intel chip supply (6 Hours Ago)
- The botnet stripped naked and exposed (1 Day Ago)
- Fedora 9: All That and a Bag O' Chips (1 Day Ago)
- What Does the Future Hold for the OS? (3 Days Ago)
- Is Google an open relay spammer? (3 Days Ago)
- Computing and disabilities (7 Days Ago)
- Chinese Army of Hackers attack Belgium (7 Days Ago)
- Is Sun Setting Sights on Linux? (8 Days Ago)
- Outlook Gets Help from the Facebook Generation (9 Days Ago)
- Review: Devotec Portable Solar Charger (9 Days Ago)
Related Forum Threads
- Windows Vista Service Pack 2 (Windows Vista)
- Ideas about windows vista (Windows Vista)
- Will you upgrade hardware for Vista? (Windows Vista)
- SP1 already announced for later this year (Windows Vista)
- Vista Exploit Surfaces on Russian Hacker Site (Windows Vista)
Featured Entry