Please support our Tech Talk advertiser:
Apr 7th, 2008, 6:44 am
According to reports it looks possible that the next big upgrade to the Windows OS, the fabled Windows 7, could arrive much earlier than expected. Within the next 12 months even. And who is responsible for making this prediction? None other than Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates himself, apparently.
If this is true then it means the development schedules that have been bandied about up to now have undergone a radical rethink.
The News.com article suggests that Gates responded to a question about Vista asked at a speech to the Inter-American development Bank and is quoted as saying "Sometime in the next year or so we will have a new version" and went on to refer to Windows 7 by adding "I'm super-enthused about what it will do in lots of ways."
Don't get too excited though, because the same story carries word that just 24 hours before a Microsoft representative told CNET that it expected to ship the Vista successor about three years on from the Vista debut in January 2007. Do the math, either Microsoft has got the dates wrong or Gates slipped up. My guess is on the latter.
If this is true then it means the development schedules that have been bandied about up to now have undergone a radical rethink.
The News.com article suggests that Gates responded to a question about Vista asked at a speech to the Inter-American development Bank and is quoted as saying "Sometime in the next year or so we will have a new version" and went on to refer to Windows 7 by adding "I'm super-enthused about what it will do in lots of ways."
Don't get too excited though, because the same story carries word that just 24 hours before a Microsoft representative told CNET that it expected to ship the Vista successor about three years on from the Vista debut in January 2007. Do the math, either Microsoft has got the dates wrong or Gates slipped up. My guess is on the latter.
This blog entry was written by Bill Andad, staff writer aka newsguy. It has received 1,088 views, 4 comments, and 9 linkbacks. 2 voters have rated this entry an average of 5 out of 5 stars. It was promoted to featured status Apr 7th, 2008.
•
•
•
•
advertising apple botnet business crime data development email environment europe facebook firefox gaming google hacking hardware ibm internet iphone ipod law legal linux malware microsoft mobile mozilla mp3 news office operating os privacy research search security software spam survey system technology trojan ubuntu virus vista web windows xp yahoo youtube
All Recent Tags Comments (Newest First)
jbennet | Microsoft Fanboy | Apr 7th, 2008
•
•
•
•
no
vista went *retail* in 2007, it was RTM on November 8, 2006 and available to volume licencing customers etc... on November 30th 2006
I agree. Im only just moving off NT4 and 2000 and onto XP Pro/Server 2003
vista went *retail* in 2007, it was RTM on November 8, 2006 and available to volume licencing customers etc... on November 30th 2006
•
•
•
•
I try to make myself not to care when the next Windows comes around. Sometimes I slap myself and have the revelation that it's really *not* a big deal...
I agree. Im only just moving off NT4 and 2000 and onto XP Pro/Server 2003
scru | Posting Shark | Apr 7th, 2008
•
•
•
•
I try to make myself not to care when the next Windows comes around. Sometimes I slap myself and have the revelation that it's really *not* a big deal...
On my better days I code in python and say random things.
On my better days I code in python and say random things.
happygeek | He's The Daddy | Apr 7th, 2008
•
•
•
•
I would have looked at it from Jan 2007 plus 3 years equals Jan 2010, within 12 months of April 2008 equals before April 2009.
So the dates are wrong, by some 9 months - or put another way, nearly a year
So the dates are wrong, by some 9 months - or put another way, nearly a year
jbennet | Microsoft Fanboy | Apr 7th, 2008
•
•
•
•
three years on from the Vista debut in January 2007 = end of 2009
so the dates arent wrong - also rtm dates are not = retail dates
windows 7 should be good. Should hopefully take into account all the lessons learnt from
vista and build on the solid codebase of vista and server 2008.
so the dates arent wrong - also rtm dates are not = retail dates
windows 7 should be good. Should hopefully take into account all the lessons learnt from
vista and build on the solid codebase of vista and server 2008.
Post Comment
•
•
•
•
Only community members can start a blog or comment on blog entries. You must register or log in to contribute.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
DaniWeb Tech Talk Marketplace
Related Blog Entries
- Intel To Focus on Devices, Again (9 Hours Ago)
- New Xbox 360 Dashboard next month (12 Hours Ago)
- 5-4-3-2-1 your website in infected (1 Day Ago)
- Apple ships 2.5 million Macs, sells 11 million iPods and 717,000 iPhones in just 3 months (2 Days Ago)
- Limbo 2 Trojan comes complete with guarantee of invisibility (3 Days Ago)
- More Dark Spots on Apple's MobileMe Migration (3 Days Ago)
- Power-Sipping PC Runs Linux (3 Days Ago)
- British business not getting the IM message (4 Days Ago)
- Fake UPS invoices deliver Pushdo botnet package (4 Days Ago)
- Crystal Ball Sunday #8: Virtual Appliances (4 Days Ago)
Related Forum Threads
- Automatic Files Sorting and Folders Creation (VB.NET)
- New Laptop with XP--possible?? (Windows Vista)
Featured Entry