Moonlight Steals Spotlight From Silverlight
Please support our Web Development advertiser: Programming Forums
May 22nd, 2008, 11:02 pm
I laugh inside when Microsoft loses ground, even in the slightest way. It’s particularly sweet when Redmond loses to a company like Novell, which owned the LAN market it pioneered through the 1990s, only to have it ripped from its grasp by the totally inferior Windows NT. This week Novell’s Miguel de Icaza announced the first public (pre-beta) release of Moonlight, an open-source implementation of Microsoft’s Silverlight browser plug-in for media streaming and running rich Internet applications. Both products would compete in the space now dominated by Adobe’s Flash Player.
In my experience, anything having to do with media playback that Microsoft touches has turned to garbage. Take Media Player. Version 2.0 is a far better utility than anything that has come along since. Media Player 10 is slow, bloated and unintuitive. Not to mention ugly. Who in their right mind would install Silverlight over Flash as their runtime for browser-based RIAs? The same people, I suppose, that now need to use IE to get all the functionality from browser apps containing ActiveX controls. But I digress.
According to Miguel’s May 13 blog post, the Moonlight release for Firefox supports the Silverlight 1.0 profile for Linux x86 and x86-64. The early release support no media codecs. Developers and contributors are invited to visit the download page and submit any bugs.
Microsoft released Silverlight last September, but still has not added tooling to Visual Studio, according to a Redmond Developer News story from May 12. Silverlight 2.0 is reportedly in phase 1 beta testing, and a compatible version of Moonlight is already in the works.
In my experience, anything having to do with media playback that Microsoft touches has turned to garbage. Take Media Player. Version 2.0 is a far better utility than anything that has come along since. Media Player 10 is slow, bloated and unintuitive. Not to mention ugly. Who in their right mind would install Silverlight over Flash as their runtime for browser-based RIAs? The same people, I suppose, that now need to use IE to get all the functionality from browser apps containing ActiveX controls. But I digress.
According to Miguel’s May 13 blog post, the Moonlight release for Firefox supports the Silverlight 1.0 profile for Linux x86 and x86-64. The early release support no media codecs. Developers and contributors are invited to visit the download page and submit any bugs.
Microsoft released Silverlight last September, but still has not added tooling to Visual Studio, according to a Redmond Developer News story from May 12. Silverlight 2.0 is reportedly in phase 1 beta testing, and a compatible version of Moonlight is already in the works.
•
•
•
•
This blog entry was written by Edward J Correia, staff writer aka EddieC. It has been filed under the Web Development category. It has received 1,952 views, 3 comment(s), and 4 linkbacks. It was promoted to featured news status May 22nd, 2008.
EddieC | Newbie Poster | May 24th, 2008
jbennet | Moderator | May 23rd, 2008
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Media Player 10 is slow, bloated and unintuitive
thats why media player 11 exists DUH...
scru | Nearly a Posting Virtuoso | May 23rd, 2008
•
•
•
•
Quick fact - Microsoft actually partnered with Novell to push Moonlight out to the niche Linux market.
"Who in their right mind would install Silverlight over Flash as their runtime for browser-based RIAs?" you make it sound as though the two can't co-exist peacefully. As though you can't install both and be happy. To answer your question; somebody who needs use an app that was written in silverlight. They can't, after all, force their flash plugin to run it, can they?
"I laugh inside when Microsoft loses ground, even in the slightest way." - I laugh inside when people go and say things like that.
"Who in their right mind would install Silverlight over Flash as their runtime for browser-based RIAs?" you make it sound as though the two can't co-exist peacefully. As though you can't install both and be happy. To answer your question; somebody who needs use an app that was written in silverlight. They can't, after all, force their flash plugin to run it, can they?
"I laugh inside when Microsoft loses ground, even in the slightest way." - I laugh inside when people go and say things like that.
Related Blog Entries
- Michael Jackson sparks celebrity death hoax epidemic (3 Days Ago)
- Reading a 200 year old newspaper in the hot tub (5 Days Ago)
- Michael Jackson and web events (7 Days Ago)
- Barmy Ballmer and his Ba Da Bing Billions (10 Days Ago)
- Montana City Demands Passwords from Job Applicants (15 Days Ago)
Related Forum Threads
- What software can I use to build Flash without Adobe Flash? (IT Professionals' Lounge)
- Adobe Flash Player ActiveX...problem (Windows tips 'n' tweaks)
- Adobe Flash "Vulnerability" = My computer DEAD! HELP! (Viruses, Spyware and other Nasties)
- Adobe flash player deployment over network (Networking Hardware Configuration)
- Strange Computer Problems (Viruses, Spyware and other Nasties)
- How to stop "Adobe Flash Player" pop up? (Windows NT / 2000 / XP / 2003)
hi scru- yeah, I had seen reports of Microsoft's "cooperation," with Novell on Moonlight, but didn't give it much stock. I've found that if my default position is to distrust Monopolysoft, I'm right most of the time.