•
•
•
•
What is DaniWeb IT Discussion Community?
You're currently browsing the IT Water Cooler category of DaniWeb, a massive community of 427,454 software developers, web developers, Internet marketers, and tech gurus who are all enthusiastic about making contacts, networking, and learning from each other. In fact, there are 3,610 IT professionals currently interacting right now! Registration is free, only takes a minute and lets you enjoy all of the interactive features of the site.
Please support our IT Water Cooler advertiser: Affiliate Marketing
May 31st, 2008, 8:52 pm
Hello,
I know this is over reported and pretty much common knowledge amongst most circles (most of whom frequently orbit Daniweb) but I've decided to revisit an age old issue.
The problem of some versions of Vista not reading or display 4GB or RAM isn't a new exactly a new one, so why is it still causing so many issues?
You'll be hard pressed to find an IT forum that hasn't got an article of some kind on this. If it has been going on this long why might you ask - has a practical solution been found or why weren't retailers better prepared?
A daft basis for a blog entry most of you will no doubt say but bare with me on this one; I recently came across some items on a few of our e-commerce sites while at work. They all have 4GB RAM, they're all 32 Bit and none of the ones displayed will actually be able to use all 4GB they're loaded with.
With this being such a well known and documented problem why are buyers still purchasing vast quantities of products that won't meet their specifications? Maybe to try and keep good relations with suppliers and maintain those bulk discounts or perhaps because they simply don't know.
This issue wasn't conceived overnight; it has been 'in the oven' for a fair while. And is partially down to a mathematical issue of 32 Bit systems. This is nothing new, but still a major issue.
One reason that seems to make this seem even worse is that over the years we've become used to being able to simply upgrade when we were no longer happy with the performance of an item. If your camera card gets full quick - you can simply get a bigger one (16GB if it's SDHC), if you're running low on storage space - there's copious amounts of external hard disks - and the upper quartile of what we could obtain has always been so far ahead that the void in between was one that you felt you could actually fit the entire ether capacious into with ease.
And suddenly we're told that this may no longer be the case for one item in particular - RAM being the said item. We've gone from having maybe 128MB or even a whopping 256MB of RAM - and the possibility’s were endless; it was utter madness even contemplating that you would ever need more, let alone a whole Gigabyte.
That wasn't that long ago (even in my youthful age I still recall such a time) and yet it appears almost overnight our love of constant upgrading is being forced into change.
Either way I'll certainly raise this with the powers that be on Monday.
Dazza
I know this is over reported and pretty much common knowledge amongst most circles (most of whom frequently orbit Daniweb) but I've decided to revisit an age old issue.
The problem of some versions of Vista not reading or display 4GB or RAM isn't a new exactly a new one, so why is it still causing so many issues?
You'll be hard pressed to find an IT forum that hasn't got an article of some kind on this. If it has been going on this long why might you ask - has a practical solution been found or why weren't retailers better prepared?
A daft basis for a blog entry most of you will no doubt say but bare with me on this one; I recently came across some items on a few of our e-commerce sites while at work. They all have 4GB RAM, they're all 32 Bit and none of the ones displayed will actually be able to use all 4GB they're loaded with.
With this being such a well known and documented problem why are buyers still purchasing vast quantities of products that won't meet their specifications? Maybe to try and keep good relations with suppliers and maintain those bulk discounts or perhaps because they simply don't know.
This issue wasn't conceived overnight; it has been 'in the oven' for a fair while. And is partially down to a mathematical issue of 32 Bit systems. This is nothing new, but still a major issue.
One reason that seems to make this seem even worse is that over the years we've become used to being able to simply upgrade when we were no longer happy with the performance of an item. If your camera card gets full quick - you can simply get a bigger one (16GB if it's SDHC), if you're running low on storage space - there's copious amounts of external hard disks - and the upper quartile of what we could obtain has always been so far ahead that the void in between was one that you felt you could actually fit the entire ether capacious into with ease.
And suddenly we're told that this may no longer be the case for one item in particular - RAM being the said item. We've gone from having maybe 128MB or even a whopping 256MB of RAM - and the possibility’s were endless; it was utter madness even contemplating that you would ever need more, let alone a whole Gigabyte.
That wasn't that long ago (even in my youthful age I still recall such a time) and yet it appears almost overnight our love of constant upgrading is being forced into change.
Either way I'll certainly raise this with the powers that be on Monday.
Dazza

This blog entry was written by darrenw89. It has received 403 views, 0 comments, and 0 linkbacks. 1 voter has rated this entry 5 out of 5 stars.
•
•
•
•
.net activation apple bill gates blog clone code computer dell desktop development drm gartner google hack key linux mac microsoft midori mobile news novell office operating operating system operating systems os patch pirate product red hat safari security serial server software sp1 system ubuntu unix upgrade virtualization vista vmware windows windows 7 wpf xp yahoo
All Recent Tags Post Comment
•
•
•
•
Only community members can start a blog or comment on blog entries. You must register or log in to contribute.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
DaniWeb IT Water Cooler Marketplace
Related Blog Entries
- Symantec buys MessageLabs, does new deal with Dell (1 Hour Ago)
- The 10 Best Linux Distributions (1 Day Ago)
- Amgen One Biotech Stock With Long Legs (2 Days Ago)
- Your Smartphone is Starting to Look Like a Computer (2 Days Ago)
- Medical Technology Stocks A Silver Lining in "Worst Market Week Ever" (2 Days Ago)
- If True, Apple's $800 Notebook Couldn't Come at a Better Time (2 Days Ago)
- Google Refutes Cloud Computing Negativity (3 Days Ago)
- Goggling Google (5 Days Ago)
- And if I don't want a replaceable battery..? (4 Days Ago)
- Cell Phone Sales Slow - Bad News for Apple and RIM (4 Days Ago)
Related Forum Threads
- Have tried every step mentioned and still not working HELP PLEASE (Windows NT / 2000 / XP / 2003)
- We were mentioned on Dr. Phil today! (Promotion and Marketing Plans)
- Write document type definition for the above-mentioned tags using XML (XML, XSLT and XPATH)
- Windows XP keeps restarting since a new video card (Windows NT / 2000 / XP / 2003)
- Random Restarts (Windows NT / 2000 / XP / 2003)
- Linux/UNIX (*nix Software)
- Amazon Web Services (IT Technologies and Trends)
- Summer Classes (Geeks' Lounge)
- OptiPerl - Perl IDE (Perl)