Please support our Tech Talk advertiser: Programming Forums
Jun 10th, 2008, 6:42 am
Andrew Cuomo, New York Attorney General, has been fighting one of those fights that you sadly cannot win: to rid the Internet of child pornography. Believe me, as a father of four I would love to say that it was possible but as a technology journalist with some 20 years experience of writing about the online world and the people who inhabit it I know that it isn't. It would take a sea change in terms of international cooperation, both legal and political, for starters and that's without even thinking about the technological hurdles that would need to be jumped. Still, according to the New York Times Cuomo has won a small victory in the battle against the paedophiles, even if the war itself looks set to wage on indefinitely.
That victory comes as three of the bigger US service providers have agreed to block child sex abuse sites and bulletin boards alike. Sprint, Time Warner Cable and Verizon have all come clean and admitted that they will bring a broad brush to the likes of Usenet which has been exploited by paedophiles as both an avenue of communication and a system of image exchange for as long as I can remember.
The Inquirer reveals that coming to this conclusion was not as straightforward as you might imagine, however. "Despite the fact that service providers clearly state in their customer service agreements that certain activity (including child sex abuse) is severely discouraged, they rarely do anything to prevent it, or to remove the sites once they are up" says reporter Sylvie Barak, continuing "Sprint, Verizon and Time Warner only agreed to enter negotiations after a sting type operation proved that the companies totally ignored any 'consumer' (or undercover attorney general employee) complaints about illicit material."
It appears that only after threatening to bring charges against the ISPs for fraud and deceptive business practises, if the reports are to be believed, did the acts get cleaned up. Which kind of proves, I guess, that where there is a will there is a way. Indeed, several more ISPs are said by the New York Times to be in negotiation with Cuomo on following suit. The trouble is that while I agree you have to start somewhere, New York is a little fish in a hug international Internet sea. Heck, where there is precious little evidence of a groundswell of other US States taking the same approach as New York, let alone other nation states around the world, the hopelessness of the situation starts to become clear.
Unfortunately, I do not have a workable answer to the problem although I look forward to reading yours…
That victory comes as three of the bigger US service providers have agreed to block child sex abuse sites and bulletin boards alike. Sprint, Time Warner Cable and Verizon have all come clean and admitted that they will bring a broad brush to the likes of Usenet which has been exploited by paedophiles as both an avenue of communication and a system of image exchange for as long as I can remember.
The Inquirer reveals that coming to this conclusion was not as straightforward as you might imagine, however. "Despite the fact that service providers clearly state in their customer service agreements that certain activity (including child sex abuse) is severely discouraged, they rarely do anything to prevent it, or to remove the sites once they are up" says reporter Sylvie Barak, continuing "Sprint, Verizon and Time Warner only agreed to enter negotiations after a sting type operation proved that the companies totally ignored any 'consumer' (or undercover attorney general employee) complaints about illicit material."
It appears that only after threatening to bring charges against the ISPs for fraud and deceptive business practises, if the reports are to be believed, did the acts get cleaned up. Which kind of proves, I guess, that where there is a will there is a way. Indeed, several more ISPs are said by the New York Times to be in negotiation with Cuomo on following suit. The trouble is that while I agree you have to start somewhere, New York is a little fish in a hug international Internet sea. Heck, where there is precious little evidence of a groundswell of other US States taking the same approach as New York, let alone other nation states around the world, the hopelessness of the situation starts to become clear.
Unfortunately, I do not have a workable answer to the problem although I look forward to reading yours…
This blog entry was written by Davey Winder, staff writer aka happygeek. It has received 1,493 views, 1 comment, and 42 linkbacks. 1 voter has rated this entry 5 out of 5 stars. It was promoted to featured status Jun 10th, 2008.
•
•
•
•
advertising apple blog botnet broadband browser business crime data development email environment europe facebook firefox gaming google government hacking hardware ibm internet iphone ipod itunes law legal linux malware microsoft mobile mozilla music news privacy research search security software spam survey technology trojan uk video vista web windows yahoo youtube
All Recent Tags Comments (Newest First)
jwenting | duckman | Jun 11th, 2008
•
•
•
•
next step, sueing these ISPs for violation of their contracts with their customers to provide unlimited access.
Even though I don't like child porn, and would never knowingly download any (sometimes one does get tricked into visiting sites one doesn't want when they're misrepresented by search engines), blocking them when you sign a contract with your customers that you won't limit their internet access is a contract violation.
But I doubt anyone will dare take that step lest they be branded a pedophile themselves, loose their jobs, get forced to change their name and move out of state to avoid the vigilantes firebombing their houses and cars, etc. etc.
And of course the ACLU won't be anywhere near when it happens.
Next step, force ISPs to block content that radical Muslims don't like because such content would upset radical Muslims...
Even though I don't like child porn, and would never knowingly download any (sometimes one does get tricked into visiting sites one doesn't want when they're misrepresented by search engines), blocking them when you sign a contract with your customers that you won't limit their internet access is a contract violation.
But I doubt anyone will dare take that step lest they be branded a pedophile themselves, loose their jobs, get forced to change their name and move out of state to avoid the vigilantes firebombing their houses and cars, etc. etc.
And of course the ACLU won't be anywhere near when it happens.
Next step, force ISPs to block content that radical Muslims don't like because such content would upset radical Muslims...
Post Comment
•
•
•
•
Only community members can start a blog or comment on blog entries. You must register or log in to contribute.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
DaniWeb Tech Talk Marketplace
Related Blog Entries
- Symantec buys MessageLabs, does new deal with Dell (1 Hour Ago)
- Who does Microsoft hate the most? (22 Hours Ago)
- Apple Leaves Customers Bugging Out! (5 Days Ago)
- T-Mobile loses 17 million customer records (6 Days Ago)
- No more crazy satnav directions? (6 Days Ago)
- Who Really Rules The World? (7 Days Ago)
- Fat spotty losers with no friends feel Internet teen heat (8 Days Ago)
- Apple iTunes Store Closing Bluff Works (9 Days Ago)
- Elvis cloned! (10 Days Ago)
- Moles attack data (10 Days Ago)
Featured Entry