Please support our Software Development advertiser:
Jul 25th, 2008, 7:15 pm
Microsoft it was disclosed today will become a sponsor of the Apache Software Foundation, forking over US$100,000 a year for theprivilege . In return, Redmond will gain access to the Apache POI project, a Java port of file formats of Microsoft's Office suite of applications.
Based on Microsoft's history, I have my suspicions about the company's motives. Yes, it's been exhibiting a more open stance of late, but the sting of its exclusionary practices and once-closed file formats remains. But Microsoft has been moving toward opening its formats recently, and I'm willing to believe the move is yet another effort at interoperability. Besides, I hear that Apache's governance model is pretty tight.
To help explain the strategy, Sam Ramji, director of Microsoft's open source software lab, described an entry on his blog, what the move is to the company and what it is not.
"It is not a move away from IIS as Microsoft’s strategic web server technology. We have invested significantly in refactoring and adding new, state-of-the-art features to IIS, including support for PHP. We will continue to invest in IIS for the long term and are currently under way with development of IIS 8.
"It is a strong endorsement of The Apache Way, and opens a new chapter in our relationship with the ASF. We have worked with Apache POI, Apache Axis2, Jakarta, and other projects in the last year, and we will continue our technical support and interoperability testing work for this open source software."
I've been glad to see Microsoft's recent moves toward openness. Maybe it will blossom into an open version of Windows.
Based on Microsoft's history, I have my suspicions about the company's motives. Yes, it's been exhibiting a more open stance of late, but the sting of its exclusionary practices and once-closed file formats remains. But Microsoft has been moving toward opening its formats recently, and I'm willing to believe the move is yet another effort at interoperability. Besides, I hear that Apache's governance model is pretty tight.
To help explain the strategy, Sam Ramji, director of Microsoft's open source software lab, described an entry on his blog, what the move is to the company and what it is not.
"It is not a move away from IIS as Microsoft’s strategic web server technology. We have invested significantly in refactoring and adding new, state-of-the-art features to IIS, including support for PHP. We will continue to invest in IIS for the long term and are currently under way with development of IIS 8.
"It is a strong endorsement of The Apache Way, and opens a new chapter in our relationship with the ASF. We have worked with Apache POI, Apache Axis2, Jakarta, and other projects in the last year, and we will continue our technical support and interoperability testing work for this open source software."
I've been glad to see Microsoft's recent moves toward openness. Maybe it will blossom into an open version of Windows.
This blog entry was written by Edward J Correia, staff writer aka EddieC. It has received 466 views, 3 comments, and 2 linkbacks. It was promoted to featured status 26 Days Ago.
•
•
•
•
adobe advertising apple ballmer bill gates business computer console development exploit facebook firefox games gaming google hardware ibm icahn java linux live merger microsoft microsystems mobile news novell office open source operating os pc red hat search security server silverlight software source sun system upgrade vista web windows xbox 360 xp yahoo yang zune
All Recent Tags Comments (Newest First)
EddieC | Newbie Poster | 24 Days Ago
Aia | Nearly a Posting Virtuoso | 25 Days Ago
•
•
•
•
I can not wait for the day they will open Windows 3.1, which I prefer over Windows 3.0 because the analog clock run much faster.
WolfPack | Mentally Challenged Mod. | 25 Days Ago
•
•
•
•
What is so special of having an open version of Windows? Isn't the already available versions of Linux enough? I mean everyone says that OpenOffice is superior to Word, Firefox to IE, Ubuntu to Vista.. and so on, so why would people need the source of a inferior product when there are superior products already available? Or is it the cash that Windows is making that you are after?
Post Comment
•
•
•
•
Only community members can start a blog or comment on blog entries. You must register or log in to contribute.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
DaniWeb Software Development Marketplace
Related Blog Entries
- How many developers does it take to build Windows 7? (11 Hours Ago)
- Toshiba Unveils 'Near High-Def' DVD (1 Day Ago)
- USB 3.0 Draft Spec Published (6 Days Ago)
- Open Source licenses get copyright law protection (6 Days Ago)
- Court Equates Contract Breach with Copyright Infringement (6 Days Ago)
- Miyuki Suzuki's TeQ Blog - What is SOA really? (9 Days Ago)
- iPhone gets GIPS real-time VoIP for gamers (9 Days Ago)
- A Golden Age for Olympic Coverage (11 Days Ago)
- Google to Force-Feed More Cookies (11 Days Ago)
- LinuxWorld Caters to Developers (13 Days Ago)
Featured Entry
Linux etc. has surely made strides, but it's not quite there yet, IMHO. Mac OS X on the other hand...