Ballmer To Apple: Divorce Hardware and Software
Please support our Internet Marketing advertiser: Programming Forums
Oct 5th, 2008, 10:22 am
Steve Ballmer should limit his worries to Microsoft and his advice to his employees. Last week the Microsoft CEO reportedly had the audacity to suggest that Apple "become more like Microsoft," and loosen the bonds between Apple hardware and software. Is he really that clueless? Surely he's aware that it's the marriage between hardware and Mac OS X that allows Apple build the best, most intuitive computers and smartphones in the world.
According to an article on CNet News the comments came during an interview conducted by a Ziff Davis reporter at the Churchill Club, a Silicon Valley non-profit for CEOs and other mucky-mucks.
Ballmer prognosticated that Apple, Nokia and Blackberry-maker Research in Motion all will lose share as the market expands over the next five years "because they design their own proprietary hardware and tie it closely to their software."Never mind that it's those ties that permit the devices to deliver features that people want and need.
If anything, Microsoft's Monkey Boy could learn a thing or two from Apple about how to build reliable software with features people really want, rather than to bloating their systems with useless capabilities that no one asked for and will probably never use. Windows Mobile is about as easy to use as a graphing calculator.
If you can stomach it, here's a video of Ballmer speaking at the Churchill Club mostly about search. It's worth watching just to see him take a ribbing about the failed yahoo acquisition.
According to an article on CNet News the comments came during an interview conducted by a Ziff Davis reporter at the Churchill Club, a Silicon Valley non-profit for CEOs and other mucky-mucks.
Ballmer prognosticated that Apple, Nokia and Blackberry-maker Research in Motion all will lose share as the market expands over the next five years "because they design their own proprietary hardware and tie it closely to their software."Never mind that it's those ties that permit the devices to deliver features that people want and need.
If anything, Microsoft's Monkey Boy could learn a thing or two from Apple about how to build reliable software with features people really want, rather than to bloating their systems with useless capabilities that no one asked for and will probably never use. Windows Mobile is about as easy to use as a graphing calculator.
If you can stomach it, here's a video of Ballmer speaking at the Churchill Club mostly about search. It's worth watching just to see him take a ribbing about the failed yahoo acquisition.
•
•
•
•
This blog entry was written by Edward J Correia, staff writer aka EddieC. It has been filed under the Internet Marketing category. It has received 1,229 views, 3 comment(s), and 11 linkbacks. It was promoted to featured news status Oct 5th, 2008.
EddieC | Newbie Poster | Oct 6th, 2008
OlyComputers | Posting Pro | Oct 6th, 2008
•
•
•
•
When it comes down to it, he is half right. Companies are trying to make devices more universal (see googles android project and all the other mobile linux projects in development), history has showed us that people get sick of proprietary hardware.
With that said, Apple already knows this. Apple is breaking it's hardware and software up on their PC lines by using intel based hardware. You can install windows or linux on any recent Mac (linux on most of the old ones too). What they need to do to protect themselves, and what I think they are working towards now, is to make a more universal system but fine-tune their products to work together. If you can install Mac on any PC and Windows on any Mac, people who want Apple hardware will still use mac because it's tuned to it and people who want Mac software will still buy Apple hardware because it lets them utilize all the features.
Right now I'm installing OSX on a PC, Mac's not fond of people doing that but you can if you're careful. I think what Balmer meant (or at least should have meant) is that now that they've made the Intel switch they put themselves in a market where they have to compete with Apple on the same hardware, and they need to make the best of it and try to take advantage of the market.
With that said, Apple already knows this. Apple is breaking it's hardware and software up on their PC lines by using intel based hardware. You can install windows or linux on any recent Mac (linux on most of the old ones too). What they need to do to protect themselves, and what I think they are working towards now, is to make a more universal system but fine-tune their products to work together. If you can install Mac on any PC and Windows on any Mac, people who want Apple hardware will still use mac because it's tuned to it and people who want Mac software will still buy Apple hardware because it lets them utilize all the features.
Right now I'm installing OSX on a PC, Mac's not fond of people doing that but you can if you're careful. I think what Balmer meant (or at least should have meant) is that now that they've made the Intel switch they put themselves in a market where they have to compete with Apple on the same hardware, and they need to make the best of it and try to take advantage of the market.
scru | Nearly a Posting Virtuoso | Oct 5th, 2008
•
•
•
•
We're sorry Bill Gates. We learned our lesson. Now could you please come back?
Related Blog Entries
- Buy friends on Twitter (1 Day Ago)
- This Blog Post Could Be Illegal (4 Days Ago)
- Find or dump a lover by email (8 Days Ago)
- Learning the game (11 Days Ago)
- If Clicks Don't Matter, It Could Change Online Advertising (15 Days Ago)