Please support our Tech Talk advertiser: Programming Forums
Featured Entry 
Aug 31st, 2005, 1:09 pm
In between Service Packs a lot of 'Hotfix' updates are developed and made available. A number of them get made available via Windows Update as Critical updates because they relate to security issues, but most don't.
Instead, the 'Hotfixes' which relate to specific problems get mentioned or linked in Knowledgebase articles. Quite a few are only made available following a specific request for them to Microsoft Product Support Services. "Only apply it to systems that are experiencing this specific problem" you are told, and "..if you are not severely affected by this problem, we recommend that you wait for the next Windows XP service pack that contains this hotfix."
That's right! They'll be included in the next Service Pack anyway, making the download larger whether you need them or not!
Thanks to website MajorGeeks, you can download a whole bunch of the Hotfixes in a handy zip file right now, forestalling some of the later pain. There are about 120 of the updates included in the archive, and you can download it from here.
Unfortunately there's no installer included. You'll need to install them individually.
Instead, the 'Hotfixes' which relate to specific problems get mentioned or linked in Knowledgebase articles. Quite a few are only made available following a specific request for them to Microsoft Product Support Services. "Only apply it to systems that are experiencing this specific problem" you are told, and "..if you are not severely affected by this problem, we recommend that you wait for the next Windows XP service pack that contains this hotfix."
That's right! They'll be included in the next Service Pack anyway, making the download larger whether you need them or not!
Thanks to website MajorGeeks, you can download a whole bunch of the Hotfixes in a handy zip file right now, forestalling some of the later pain. There are about 120 of the updates included in the archive, and you can download it from here.
Unfortunately there's no installer included. You'll need to install them individually.
This blog entry was written by Catweazle. It has received 3,402 views, 1 comment, and 7 linkbacks. It was promoted to featured status Aug 31st, 2005.
•
•
•
•
advertising apple blog browser business data dell development economy email facebook firefox gaming google government hacking hardware ibm intel internet iphone ipod it itunes linux mac malware microsoft mobile mozilla mp3 music news open source privacy search security software sony spam stocks technology ubuntu video vista web windows yahoo youtube
All Recent Tags Comments (Newest First)
jwenting | duckman | Sep 1st, 2005
•
•
•
•
What you fail to mention is that a service pack will not just integrate hotfixes, it will also contain thoroughly tested versions of them.
So if a hotfix fixes the problem but introduces a smaller problem elsewhere which isn't critical, the service pack will address that problem by replacing the hotfix by something else (or an improved version of itself) that does not have that flaw.
The SP will also be available for a one-off installation to systems that were installed after it becomes available.
If it would not include those hotfixes people will have to install them all separately, which many will not do or fail to do properly causing problems further down the line.
There's many reasons to make a service pack all-inclusive, going even so far as to have it include all previous service packs.
Knowing the history of Windowsupdate functionality, those installing the SP through that will get only those things they really need and not things they already installed earlier and didn't change since.
So if a hotfix fixes the problem but introduces a smaller problem elsewhere which isn't critical, the service pack will address that problem by replacing the hotfix by something else (or an improved version of itself) that does not have that flaw.
The SP will also be available for a one-off installation to systems that were installed after it becomes available.
If it would not include those hotfixes people will have to install them all separately, which many will not do or fail to do properly causing problems further down the line.
There's many reasons to make a service pack all-inclusive, going even so far as to have it include all previous service packs.
Knowing the history of Windowsupdate functionality, those installing the SP through that will get only those things they really need and not things they already installed earlier and didn't change since.
Post Comment
•
•
•
•
Only community members can start a blog or comment on blog entries. You must register or log in to contribute.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
DaniWeb Tech Talk Marketplace
Related Blog Entries
- Guessing what Apple's up to (1 Hour Ago)
- Apple Leaves Customers Bugging Out! (5 Days Ago)
- T-Mobile loses 17 million customer records (7 Days Ago)
- Who Really Rules The World? (7 Days Ago)
- Apple iTunes Store Closing Bluff Works (10 Days Ago)
- Elvis cloned! (11 Days Ago)
- Moles attack data (11 Days Ago)
- No iTunes required for 2.1 billion mobile music downloads (13 Days Ago)
- States Begin Requiring Encryption of Personal Data (14 Days Ago)
- Need for speed: how does 1Gbit/s broadband grab you? (17 Days Ago)
Related Forum Threads
- Windows XP Service Pack 2 (Windows NT / 2000 / XP / 2003)
- windows service pack 2 installation - unique problem (Windows NT / 2000 / XP / 2003)
- Windows Service Pack 2 - Necessary? (Windows NT / 2000 / XP / 2003)
- pfd/adobe & xp service pack 2 (Windows NT / 2000 / XP / 2003)
- Problem With Windows Xp Service Pack 2 (Windows NT / 2000 / XP / 2003)
- xp service pack 2 boots slow (Windows NT / 2000 / XP / 2003)
- XP Service Pack 2 (Windows NT / 2000 / XP / 2003)
- Service Pack 2 Update Windows XP Pro (Windows NT / 2000 / XP / 2003)
