Please support our Tech Talk advertiser:
May 18th, 2006, 7:50 pm
Micron Technology, Inc., has unveiled a prototype of the World’s first 8-megapixel CMOS (Complementary Metal-Oxide Semiconductor) image sensor using a miniature 1.75 micron pixel design in a 1/2.5 inch optical format.
As well as being small enough to bring 3-megapixel performance to your camera equipped cell phone, the new sensor packs a secondary potential punch: speed. The inclusion of a faster processor enables the shooting of as many as 10 images per second at the full resolution, or 30 frames per second of 2-megapixel quality video, without the usual delays between images.
Although mass production of the chip itself isn’t expected until 2007, and consumer product 2008, I wouldn’t get too excited just yet anyway. As anyone who has more than a passing interest in photography will happily tell you, taking a good picture requires a lot more than just a big-pixel image sensor. The combination of light and lens is perhaps most important, and the chances of getting a really good lens into a really small cell phone anytime soon is doubtful to say the least. Of course, Micron argues that the speed and power of the new sensor enable the use of a smaller lens without compromising image resolution. I’m not knocking it, or Micron who have leveraged their position as one of the world's leading providers of advanced semiconductor solutions to drive this development. Anything that improves the awful quality, and I use that word with reservation, of cell phone photography has to be a good thing. I’m just not convinced that this is going to change the way that I use my cell phone.
I don’t want my phone to be my PDA, web browser, camera and camcorder. I just want to be able to make and take telephone calls anywhere I need to. Convergence and integration are good things for sure, but they are not the be all and end all of technological progress. What’s more, I certainly don’t want to pay extra for perceived functionality gains that are, in reality, nothing of the sort. Am I really alone in this view? Don’t all shout at once…
As well as being small enough to bring 3-megapixel performance to your camera equipped cell phone, the new sensor packs a secondary potential punch: speed. The inclusion of a faster processor enables the shooting of as many as 10 images per second at the full resolution, or 30 frames per second of 2-megapixel quality video, without the usual delays between images.
Although mass production of the chip itself isn’t expected until 2007, and consumer product 2008, I wouldn’t get too excited just yet anyway. As anyone who has more than a passing interest in photography will happily tell you, taking a good picture requires a lot more than just a big-pixel image sensor. The combination of light and lens is perhaps most important, and the chances of getting a really good lens into a really small cell phone anytime soon is doubtful to say the least. Of course, Micron argues that the speed and power of the new sensor enable the use of a smaller lens without compromising image resolution. I’m not knocking it, or Micron who have leveraged their position as one of the world's leading providers of advanced semiconductor solutions to drive this development. Anything that improves the awful quality, and I use that word with reservation, of cell phone photography has to be a good thing. I’m just not convinced that this is going to change the way that I use my cell phone.
I don’t want my phone to be my PDA, web browser, camera and camcorder. I just want to be able to make and take telephone calls anywhere I need to. Convergence and integration are good things for sure, but they are not the be all and end all of technological progress. What’s more, I certainly don’t want to pay extra for perceived functionality gains that are, in reality, nothing of the sort. Am I really alone in this view? Don’t all shout at once…
This blog entry was written by Davey Winder, staff writer aka happygeek. It has received 1,746 views, 3 comments, and 3 linkbacks. 1 voter has rated this entry 5 out of 5 stars. It was promoted to featured status May 18th, 2006.
•
•
•
•
advertising apple blog business daniweb data dell development economy email facebook firefox gaming google government hacking hardware ibm intel internet iphone ipod linux mac malware microsoft mobile mozilla mp3 music news open source privacy programming search security server software sony spam stocks technology ubuntu video vista web windows yahoo youtube
All Recent Tags Comments (Newest First)
jwenting | duckman | May 22nd, 2006
•
•
•
•
got me a new phone today. Guy at the store was quite convincing when he said it could make phonecalls, though somewhat surprised I wanted to use it for that purpose I think.
Ended up with a Nokia N70. Web access to follow in a few months when my new subscription starts (the current plan is 8 years old, from the good old days when SMS was considered a luxury addon).
Though I don't think I'll do a lot of mobile internet access, it could get handy from time to time and the new plan is a bit cheaper than the old one (especially when it comes to calling other mobile phones outside the home network).
Ended up with a Nokia N70. Web access to follow in a few months when my new subscription starts (the current plan is 8 years old, from the good old days when SMS was considered a luxury addon).
Though I don't think I'll do a lot of mobile internet access, it could get handy from time to time and the new plan is a bit cheaper than the old one (especially when it comes to calling other mobile phones outside the home network).
cscgal | The Queen of DaniWeb | May 22nd, 2006
•
•
•
•
Not very long ago, I went to the Verizon store to buy a new cellphone and I went home with a PDA. I chronicled my day's experience @ this thread: http://www.daniweb.com/techtalkforums/thread38380.html
jwenting | duckman | May 21st, 2006
•
•
•
•
"I don’t want my phone to be my PDA, web browser, camera and camcorder. I just want to be able to make and take telephone calls anywhere I need to."
Well said, I feel exactly the same way.
And no matter how many megapixels they shove into camphones they're never going to become decent cameras.
The ergonomics are rotten to say the least (though no worse than the sub miniature compacts some brands sell these days) and the optics even worse.
Well said, I feel exactly the same way.
And no matter how many megapixels they shove into camphones they're never going to become decent cameras.
The ergonomics are rotten to say the least (though no worse than the sub miniature compacts some brands sell these days) and the optics even worse.
Post Comment
•
•
•
•
Only community members can start a blog or comment on blog entries. You must register or log in to contribute.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
DaniWeb Tech Talk Marketplace
Related Blog Entries
- UK ISPs agree to throttle illegal music file-sharers (3 Hours Ago)
- Intel To Focus on Devices, Again (9 Hours Ago)
- WikiGoogle or GooglePedia? Nope, it is Knol actually. (16 Hours Ago)
- 5-4-3-2-1 your website in infected (1 Day Ago)
- Botnets boost click-fraud rate (1 Day Ago)
- Apple ships 2.5 million Macs, sells 11 million iPods and 717,000 iPhones in just 3 months (2 Days Ago)
- Limbo 2 Trojan comes complete with guarantee of invisibility (3 Days Ago)
- More Dark Spots on Apple's MobileMe Migration (3 Days Ago)
- Power-Sipping PC Runs Linux (3 Days Ago)
- Fake UPS invoices deliver Pushdo botnet package (4 Days Ago)
Related Forum Threads
- Ring and Call Tones for my Cell phone (Gadgets and Gizmos)
- Site review - Cell phone videos direct online (Website Reviews)
- Book Recommendation for Cell Phone Programming (C)
Featured Entry