Please support our Tech Talk advertiser:
Jun 22nd, 2006, 5:30 pm
The reports that are popping up all over the web that IBM, along with Georgia Tech, has demonstrated the world’s fastest ever chip are, sadly, not quite as exciting as you might at first think. Not least because this wasn’t a chip at all, but rather a transistor, and even the least technical minded of people will realize there’s something of a difference between the two. Looking beyond that basic misunderstanding of the facts, the news still fails to excite me as much as it seems to have excited everyone else and here’s for why:
Yes, it did run at more than 500GHz. Yes, that is 125 times quicker than the current batch of commercial chips. Yes, you do need a near absolute zero cold room (with a temperature of minus 451 Fahrenheit, or minus 260 degrees Celsius if you prefer) to achieve that speed. And yes, you did read that right. Within a normal environment you’ll be more likely to see a still none too shabby 350GHz which is impressive considering that your average commercial chip at the moment manages less than 4GHz, but sadly not record breaking.
Still, building a transistor made from silicon laced with germanium that runs so fast is good news and bodes well for a super-speedy computing future. It also suggests that there’s plenty of performance still to be squeezed out of silicon, albeit under rather unrealistic conditions and using very expensive base materials. What it doesn’t answer is how all the other computer bottlenecks can be overcome in order to exploit anything like the kind of performance a chip based around such technology could produce. But that will, no doubt, come with time, research and funding.
Yes, it did run at more than 500GHz. Yes, that is 125 times quicker than the current batch of commercial chips. Yes, you do need a near absolute zero cold room (with a temperature of minus 451 Fahrenheit, or minus 260 degrees Celsius if you prefer) to achieve that speed. And yes, you did read that right. Within a normal environment you’ll be more likely to see a still none too shabby 350GHz which is impressive considering that your average commercial chip at the moment manages less than 4GHz, but sadly not record breaking.
Still, building a transistor made from silicon laced with germanium that runs so fast is good news and bodes well for a super-speedy computing future. It also suggests that there’s plenty of performance still to be squeezed out of silicon, albeit under rather unrealistic conditions and using very expensive base materials. What it doesn’t answer is how all the other computer bottlenecks can be overcome in order to exploit anything like the kind of performance a chip based around such technology could produce. But that will, no doubt, come with time, research and funding.
This blog entry was written by Davey Winder, staff writer aka happygeek. It has received 1,394 views, 2 comments, and 1 linkback. 1 voter has rated this entry 5 out of 5 stars. It was promoted to featured status Jun 22nd, 2006.
Tags: linux ibm russia hardware news intel ibm recession economy technology age trends working it ibm. news ibm avatar medicine database news openoffice open source ibm sun ubuntu red hat linux news linux ibm energy news ibm blue gene supercomputer linux hardware news linux ibm red hat enterprise news linux ibm x86 development news hardware ibm news chips memory supercomputing ibm ps3 amd ibm pc microsoft dos
•
•
•
•
advertising apple business crime development economy email facebook firefox gaming google hacking hardware ibm intel internet iphone ipod it linux malware marketing microsoft mobile mozilla news office open source operating os ps3 recession red hat research search security software spam stocks sun technology trojan ubuntu virus vista web windows xp yahoo youtube
All Recent Tags Comments (Newest First)
happygeek | He's The Daddy | Jun 28th, 2006
alc6379 | Cookie... That's it | Jun 27th, 2006
•
•
•
•
If it wasn't a general purpose processor, why is everyone comparing it to the current generation of CPUs like it's so revolutionary?
It'll be revolutionary once they've strung some of these together, and really made something that does logic at 500Ghz. Then that'll be something to report...
It'll be revolutionary once they've strung some of these together, and really made something that does logic at 500Ghz. Then that'll be something to report...
Post Comment
•
•
•
•
Only community members can start a blog or comment on blog entries. You must register or log in to contribute.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
DaniWeb Tech Talk Marketplace
Related Blog Entries
- How to put in a new motherboard without losing your Operating System (3 Days Ago)
- Implementing a *Real* Internet Highway (6 Days Ago)
- Consumer electronics revenue to hit $700 billion by 2009 (8 Days Ago)
- Even prayer cannot help Jesus Phone owners today (8 Days Ago)
- Why bother with an Apple iPhone 3G? (9 Days Ago)
- The ultimate in-car tech KITT, a Knight Rider satnav (10 Days Ago)
- iPhone App Store to open Friday, Jailbreakers could care less (11 Days Ago)
- Steve Ballmer Needs to Grow A Spine (12 Days Ago)
- UK runs out of iPhone 3G handsets four days before launch (12 Days Ago)
- Viacom defends itself over YouTube data log disclosure (14 Days Ago)
Related Forum Threads
- memory management in wndows 2000 (Windows NT / 2000 / XP / 2003)
- A Guide for Finding Printer Support (Peripherals)
- IBM Cell (Motherboards, CPUs and RAM)
- IBM thinkpad monitor problem. (Monitors, Displays and Video Cards)
- IBM thinkpad t22 mobile processor question (Networking Hardware Configuration)
- IBM ThinkPad T22 bad cmos battery? (Motherboards, CPUs and RAM)
- ibm thinkpad battery.... (Troubleshooting Dead Machines)
- best chip set anyone? (Motherboards, CPUs and RAM)
- no macs? (OS X)
Featured Entry
However, it is worth reporting on as it does represent something of a technical breakthrough and draws a likely roadmap for things to come.