•
•
•
•
What is DaniWeb IT Discussion Community?
You're currently browsing the Tech Talk category of DaniWeb, a massive community of 332,618 software developers, web developers, Internet marketers, and tech gurus who are all enthusiastic about making contacts, networking, and learning from each other. In fact, there are 2,206 IT professionals currently interacting right now! Registration is free, only takes a minute and lets you enjoy all of the interactive features of the site.
Please support our Tech Talk advertiser:
Jul 19th, 2006, 8:01 pm
according to an article on ZDnet 80% of new malware is going to be able to go undetected under most anti-virus protection software.
Here is a quote from the Australian Computer Emergency Response Team.
"At the point we see it as a CERT, which is very early on -- the most popular brands of antivirus on the market … have an 80 percent miss rate. That is not a detection rate that is a miss rate.
"So if you are running these pieces of software, eight out of 10 pieces of malicious code are going to get in," said Ingram.
Along with that another story on CNEt.com reported that major security researches say that a new Trojan Horse cannot be discovered by their software. The new virus is being called "Rustock" by Symantec and "Mailbot.AZ" by F-Secure.
Now this is pretty serious we have had major viruses before, but even the companies that make and sell virus protection are stepping up and saying we cant find this one. This is a so called "new chapter..in the battle against malicous code." Just all in all bad news for anyone who is connected through the internet especially people who believe they are safe behind their virus protection. Ive never really liked those people who have hardcore Norton protection that really just slows down their internet and then they use internet explorer and get spyware anyways. We will just have to wait and see what becomes of these new trojans and what researches will come up with to protect users against them.
Here is a quote from the Australian Computer Emergency Response Team.
"At the point we see it as a CERT, which is very early on -- the most popular brands of antivirus on the market … have an 80 percent miss rate. That is not a detection rate that is a miss rate.
"So if you are running these pieces of software, eight out of 10 pieces of malicious code are going to get in," said Ingram.
Along with that another story on CNEt.com reported that major security researches say that a new Trojan Horse cannot be discovered by their software. The new virus is being called "Rustock" by Symantec and "Mailbot.AZ" by F-Secure.
Now this is pretty serious we have had major viruses before, but even the companies that make and sell virus protection are stepping up and saying we cant find this one. This is a so called "new chapter..in the battle against malicous code." Just all in all bad news for anyone who is connected through the internet especially people who believe they are safe behind their virus protection. Ive never really liked those people who have hardcore Norton protection that really just slows down their internet and then they use internet explorer and get spyware anyways. We will just have to wait and see what becomes of these new trojans and what researches will come up with to protect users against them.
•
•
•
•
advertising apple blog browser business daniweb data dell development economy email firefox forensic gaming google hacking hardware help ibm intel internet iphone ipod linux mac malware microsoft mobile mp3 music news open source privacy programming search security software sony spam stocks technology ubuntu video vista web windows xp yahoo youtube
All Recent Tags Comments (Newest First)
mikeandike22 | Nearly a Posting Virtuoso | Jul 20th, 2006
'Stein | Lapsed Skeptic | Jul 20th, 2006
•
•
•
•
Very true...for the most part.
These special, undetectible pieces are called 'rootkits', and more or less embed themselves in the windows code themselves.
However, these arn't as undetectible as people say they are. Blacklight, for example, is a known finder of most rootkits...and since Blacklight isn't a Norton/F-Secure product, theyre gonna say...
As always though, the vast majority of this stuff can be avoided using common sense, and Firefox, and a firewall.
So, in truth, there's not too big of a worry for those that are aware of it.
Thanks.
These special, undetectible pieces are called 'rootkits', and more or less embed themselves in the windows code themselves.
However, these arn't as undetectible as people say they are. Blacklight, for example, is a known finder of most rootkits...and since Blacklight isn't a Norton/F-Secure product, theyre gonna say...

As always though, the vast majority of this stuff can be avoided using common sense, and Firefox, and a firewall.
So, in truth, there's not too big of a worry for those that are aware of it.
Thanks.
Post Comment
•
•
•
•
DaniWeb Marketplace (Sponsored Links)
Related Blog Entries
- Spam swings from Viagra to Versace (19 Hours Ago)
- Chinese quake should not threaten Intel chip supply (1 Day Ago)
- The botnet stripped naked and exposed (2 Days Ago)
- Fedora 9: All That and a Bag O' Chips (2 Days Ago)
- What Does the Future Hold for the OS? (4 Days Ago)
- Is Google an open relay spammer? (5 Days Ago)
- Computing and disabilities (8 Days Ago)
- Chinese Army of Hackers attack Belgium (8 Days Ago)
- Is Sun Setting Sights on Linux? (10 Days Ago)
- Outlook Gets Help from the Facebook Generation (11 Days Ago)
Related Forum Threads
- what is the best anti virus? (Viruses, Spyware and other Nasties)
- New Anti Virus ? (Windows NT / 2000 / XP / 2003)
- Is There a Free Anti virus? (Viruses, Spyware and other Nasties)
- Norton anti-virus and SP2 problems??? (Windows NT / 2000 / XP / 2003)
- norton anti-virus (Viruses, Spyware and other Nasties)
- Symantec auto anti-virus updates (Networking Hardware Configuration)
- free anti virus programmes for XP (Windows NT / 2000 / XP / 2003)