User Name Password Register
DaniWeb IT Discussion Community
All
What is DaniWeb IT Discussion Community?
You're currently browsing the Tech Talk category of DaniWeb, a massive community of 332,618 software developers, web developers, Internet marketers, and tech gurus who are all enthusiastic about making contacts, networking, and learning from each other. In fact, there are 2,206 IT professionals currently interacting right now! Registration is free, only takes a minute and lets you enjoy all of the interactive features of the site.
Please support our Tech Talk advertiser:
Jul 19th, 2006, 8:01 pm
Views: 699
Comments: 2
AddThis Social Bookmark Button
according to an article on ZDnet 80% of new malware is going to be able to go undetected under most anti-virus protection software.

Here is a quote from the Australian Computer Emergency Response Team.

"At the point we see it as a CERT, which is very early on -- the most popular brands of antivirus on the market … have an 80 percent miss rate. That is not a detection rate that is a miss rate.
"So if you are running these pieces of software, eight out of 10 pieces of malicious code are going to get in," said Ingram.



Along with that another story on CNEt.com reported that major security researches say that a new Trojan Horse cannot be discovered by their software. The new virus is being called "Rustock" by Symantec and "Mailbot.AZ" by F-Secure.

Now this is pretty serious we have had major viruses before, but even the companies that make and sell virus protection are stepping up and saying we cant find this one. This is a so called "new chapter..in the battle against malicous code." Just all in all bad news for anyone who is connected through the internet especially people who believe they are safe behind their virus protection. Ive never really liked those people who have hardcore Norton protection that really just slows down their internet and then they use internet explorer and get spyware anyways. We will just have to wait and see what becomes of these new trojans and what researches will come up with to protect users against them.

Comments (Newest First)
mikeandike22 | Nearly a Posting Virtuoso | Jul 20th, 2006
thanks for the extra info i have also found that alternative anti-malware software is better than what symantec and mcafee have to offer.
'Stein | Lapsed Skeptic | Jul 20th, 2006
Very true...for the most part.

These special, undetectible pieces are called 'rootkits', and more or less embed themselves in the windows code themselves.

However, these arn't as undetectible as people say they are. Blacklight, for example, is a known finder of most rootkits...and since Blacklight isn't a Norton/F-Secure product, theyre gonna say...


As always though, the vast majority of this stuff can be avoided using common sense, and Firefox, and a firewall.

So, in truth, there's not too big of a worry for those that are aware of it.

Thanks.
Post Comment

Only community members can start a blog or comment on blog entries. You must register or log in to contribute.

DaniWeb Marketplace (Sponsored Links)

Related Blog Entries
Related Forum Threads
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 1:50 am.
Forum system based on vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2003 - 2008 DaniWeb® LLC