Please support our Tech Talk advertiser:
Jul 20th, 2006, 6:51 pm
After announcing the release of the new core 2 duo conroe for desktops and merriem for laptops intel has said that they are going to release a quad-core processor by the end of this year. So if you were waiting around to buy a core 2 duo or an amd 64 X-2 than you will be waisting your money. This is becuase by the time youve had your new processor for a couple of months it will be completley obsolete.
So far the reviews about the core 2 duo have shown nothing but the best. I have heard that there wasnt that much difference in gaming performance but they didnt say what kind of graphics cards they were testing it with. This is a pretty rediculous time in processor development I cant imagine how well the quad-core is gonna do on the benchmarks.
Now im not so sure I would be able to afford either of these cards but im guessing the good news for me is that the pentium D will be come cheaper which is powerful enough for most of my computer needs. I would like to get a quad-core but im not exactly rolling in the money for it. SO LOOK AT MY BLOG AND GIVE ME THAT PRIZE. Just kidding but it doesnt hurt to try. So basically if you still have a pentium 4 and have been waiting to be able to afford something better this will probably be your chance I would wait a couple months into the core 2 duo release if you want a pentium D and then I would do the same if you want the core 2 just wait until the quad core is out and then as usual prices will drop as new products come out. Plus if your gonna buy a computer from a company like Dell they will probably be stocking their machines with the newest intel products. Although they did sign a deal to start selling AMD processors as a choice in their systems.
So far the reviews about the core 2 duo have shown nothing but the best. I have heard that there wasnt that much difference in gaming performance but they didnt say what kind of graphics cards they were testing it with. This is a pretty rediculous time in processor development I cant imagine how well the quad-core is gonna do on the benchmarks.
Now im not so sure I would be able to afford either of these cards but im guessing the good news for me is that the pentium D will be come cheaper which is powerful enough for most of my computer needs. I would like to get a quad-core but im not exactly rolling in the money for it. SO LOOK AT MY BLOG AND GIVE ME THAT PRIZE. Just kidding but it doesnt hurt to try. So basically if you still have a pentium 4 and have been waiting to be able to afford something better this will probably be your chance I would wait a couple months into the core 2 duo release if you want a pentium D and then I would do the same if you want the core 2 just wait until the quad core is out and then as usual prices will drop as new products come out. Plus if your gonna buy a computer from a company like Dell they will probably be stocking their machines with the newest intel products. Although they did sign a deal to start selling AMD processors as a choice in their systems.
This blog entry was written by mikeandike22. It has received 2,402 views, 9 comments, and 6 linkbacks. 3 voters have rated this entry an average of 4.33 out of 5 stars. It was promoted to featured status Jul 21st, 2006.
•
•
•
•
advertising apple blog business daniweb data dell development economy email facebook firefox gaming google government hacking hardware ibm intel internet iphone ipod linux mac malware microsoft mobile mozilla mp3 music news open source privacy programming search security server software sony spam stocks technology ubuntu video vista web windows yahoo youtube
All Recent Tags Comments (Newest First)
mikeandike22 | Nearly a Posting Virtuoso | Jul 26th, 2006
vicec64 | Junior Poster | Jul 26th, 2006
•
•
•
•
Actually the only thing you'll notice in BF2 with dual core as opposed to single is a very, very slight higher average frame rate (1-4). it runs a tad smoother with DC, but that's all negated if you only run 1 gig of ram as oppoed to a gamer that runs 2 gigs on a single core processor. It's of very slight benefit at best, but fairly soon it should be of even more benefit.
Dark_Omen | Posting Pro | Jul 23rd, 2006
•
•
•
•
Some games already have that feature, like Call of Duty 2 has (had) a seperate verision to optimaly run on computers with dual core (v1.01) before they released the newer version, and Battlefield 2 has support for dual core which is good, cause like flightsim it is a resource hungary game, and there was a much noticable difference when I play BF2 on my dual-core computer, then on my friend's single core running at the same speed (and both comps are pretty much the same other than the processor type).
jwenting | duckman | Jul 23rd, 2006
•
•
•
•
If you always hold off to buy the next announced CPU or GPU you'll never buy one.
As to gaming performance, there's indeed not that much difference YET between single core and multi-core CPUs, but that's mostly because most games to this day aren't programmed to make use of multi processor (or multi core) systems, thus all but one core will be idle while the game runs.
Where I have noticed a difference when running MS Flightsim 2004 together with helper programs is when forcing those helpers together into one core and letting FS take the other.
FS is extremely CPU hungry, so giving it a core of its own helps.
Upcoming games will make better use of multi-core systems as they're ever more programmed for it.
As to gaming performance, there's indeed not that much difference YET between single core and multi-core CPUs, but that's mostly because most games to this day aren't programmed to make use of multi processor (or multi core) systems, thus all but one core will be idle while the game runs.
Where I have noticed a difference when running MS Flightsim 2004 together with helper programs is when forcing those helpers together into one core and letting FS take the other.
FS is extremely CPU hungry, so giving it a core of its own helps.
Upcoming games will make better use of multi-core systems as they're ever more programmed for it.
mikeandike22 | Nearly a Posting Virtuoso | Jul 21st, 2006
Dark_Omen | Posting Pro | Jul 21st, 2006
•
•
•
•
I wouldn't worry about it, like movielad said, there is always a better model in a couple of months, and this has been the case since the creation of the computer. I'm actually waiting for the octo-core's
, which are probably already in development.
, which are probably already in development. movielad | Junior Poster in Training | Jul 21st, 2006
•
•
•
•
If I did that, I'd *never* be able to buy a computer. There's bound to be something bigger and better in x number of months. You've also got to consider that when these new machines come out, they're going to be expensive in comparison to the current range of machines. To buy these new quads at current prices, I'd have to wait for quite some time while Intel and the manufacturers start slashing prices.
M.
M.
mikeandike22 | Nearly a Posting Virtuoso | Jul 21st, 2006
movielad | Junior Poster in Training | Jul 21st, 2006
•
•
•
•
Even if you invest it a Core 2 Duo now, it certainly won't be obsolete when the quad-core stuff comes out. My theory is that they're going to be aiming at power users initially and then _slowly_ roll out different models/specifications across the board. Intel aren't stupid, and very much doubt they're going to want to alienate their existing customers who have just invested in a Core Duo/Core 2 Duo system.
Whatever computer system you buy, you buy because you need it now. If we just stood around waiting for the next greatest thing to come along, nobody would be getting anything done
M.
Whatever computer system you buy, you buy because you need it now. If we just stood around waiting for the next greatest thing to come along, nobody would be getting anything done

M.
Post Comment
•
•
•
•
Only community members can start a blog or comment on blog entries. You must register or log in to contribute.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
DaniWeb Tech Talk Marketplace
Related Blog Entries
- 5-4-3-2-1 your website in infected (22 Hours Ago)
- Apple ships 2.5 million Macs, sells 11 million iPods and 717,000 iPhones in just 3 months (2 Days Ago)
- Limbo 2 Trojan comes complete with guarantee of invisibility (2 Days Ago)
- More Dark Spots on Apple's MobileMe Migration (2 Days Ago)
- Power-Sipping PC Runs Linux (2 Days Ago)
- Fake UPS invoices deliver Pushdo botnet package (3 Days Ago)
- Crystal Ball Sunday #8: Virtual Appliances (3 Days Ago)
- How to put in a new motherboard without losing your Operating System (7 Days Ago)
- Implementing a *Real* Internet Highway (11 Days Ago)
- Even prayer cannot help Jesus Phone owners today (12 Days Ago)
Related Forum Threads
- New build, first time builder, AM2 system (Motherboards, CPUs and RAM)
- need opinion! (Techies' Lounge)
- AMD 64 or Intel Dual Core or P4 3ghz? Which is best for Gaming? (Motherboards, CPUs and RAM)
- Buying a new system - after feedback/opinions (Motherboards, CPUs and RAM)
- AMD or INTEL? (Motherboards, CPUs and RAM)
- YOUR CALL - BUY AMD or INTEL!!! (Motherboards, CPUs and RAM)
- Dual dualcore Macs coming? Quad processors? (Mac Rumors and Reports)
Featured Entry