Please support our Software Development advertiser:
Aug 12th, 2006, 10:51 am
The Intel Open Source Technology Center has officially released open source graphics drivers for the 965 Express chipset in a move that while not exactly unprecedented is, nonetheless, a most welcome display of commitment to the provision of free software drivers.
Moreover, it is a display of that commitment in a relatively high-end capacity: the 965 supports OpenGL vertex sharing as well as hardware transforms. In addition, Intel stand-alone in releasing source code for their Linux drivers, currently you do not find the same open approach from either NVIDIA or ATI. A situation that may have to change if they wish to keep pace with Intel, now that independently developed drivers with high end feature support are likely to become more commonplace as a result of the Intel move.
Certainly more than the odd one or two kernel maintainers have been fairly vocal about the legitimacy, both moral and legal, of proprietary graphics drivers. While I firmly believe they are wrong in the legality argument, as those proprietary drivers tend to interface with the kernel using an open source shim to get around the GPL, there is less to debate when it comes to the moral ground. There is also little to debate when it comes to Intel gaining a competitive advantage by going open source like this, as I would certainly be inclined to base my graphics hardware purchase upon driver software licensing issues when all else is said and done. The fact that 965 Express kit can be supported out of the box is a tremendous advantage, it seems to me.
So what are AMD (which recently acquired ATI) and NVIDIA doing about it? Surprisingly, in the case of NVIDIA, not a lot if the usual online sources are to be believed. AMD, however, are taking the threat more seriously and strong rumors are circulating in tech press and development circles that they will follow suit, although perhaps only as far as a functional subset of drivers but follow suit, nonetheless. Only time will tell, of course, but time may be running out in this case.
Moreover, it is a display of that commitment in a relatively high-end capacity: the 965 supports OpenGL vertex sharing as well as hardware transforms. In addition, Intel stand-alone in releasing source code for their Linux drivers, currently you do not find the same open approach from either NVIDIA or ATI. A situation that may have to change if they wish to keep pace with Intel, now that independently developed drivers with high end feature support are likely to become more commonplace as a result of the Intel move.
Certainly more than the odd one or two kernel maintainers have been fairly vocal about the legitimacy, both moral and legal, of proprietary graphics drivers. While I firmly believe they are wrong in the legality argument, as those proprietary drivers tend to interface with the kernel using an open source shim to get around the GPL, there is less to debate when it comes to the moral ground. There is also little to debate when it comes to Intel gaining a competitive advantage by going open source like this, as I would certainly be inclined to base my graphics hardware purchase upon driver software licensing issues when all else is said and done. The fact that 965 Express kit can be supported out of the box is a tremendous advantage, it seems to me.
So what are AMD (which recently acquired ATI) and NVIDIA doing about it? Surprisingly, in the case of NVIDIA, not a lot if the usual online sources are to be believed. AMD, however, are taking the threat more seriously and strong rumors are circulating in tech press and development circles that they will follow suit, although perhaps only as far as a functional subset of drivers but follow suit, nonetheless. Only time will tell, of course, but time may be running out in this case.
This blog entry was written by Davey Winder, staff writer aka happygeek. It has received 1,792 views, 0 comments, and 4 linkbacks. 1 voter has rated this entry 5 out of 5 stars. It was promoted to featured status Aug 12th, 2006.
•
•
•
•
amd apple browser browsers china code dell desktop development fedora firefox google gpl graphics hardware ibm intel internet kde laptop linux marketing microsoft mobile mozilla news novell open open source openoffice operating systems os patents programming red hat search security server software source sun ubuntu unix via virtualization vista web windows xml xp
All Recent Tags Post Comment
•
•
•
•
Only community members can start a blog or comment on blog entries. You must register or log in to contribute.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
DaniWeb Software Development Marketplace
Related Blog Entries
- Security Holes Spring Up in Java Framework (3 Days Ago)
- iPhone 3G: It Was All Yellow (4 Days Ago)
- Consumer electronics revenue to hit $700 billion by 2009 (8 Days Ago)
- The ultimate in-car tech KITT, a Knight Rider satnav (10 Days Ago)
- iPhone App Store to open Friday, Jailbreakers could care less (11 Days Ago)
- Cross-Platform RealBasic 3 IDE Ships Today (11 Days Ago)
- Coders Can be Frugal When They Use Krugle (12 Days Ago)
- Microsoft Publishes File Format Specs, 'Open Connections' (13 Days Ago)
- Apple slow to patch iPhone security holes (14 Days Ago)
- 12,000 laptops lost in US airports EVERY WEEK (15 Days Ago)
Related Forum Threads
- Creating strong AI (open source) (C++)
- Open Source Projects (C++)
- Looking for open source message queue implementation (Java)
- The Eternal Sun - open-source MMORPG needs coders (C++)
- Voluntary-The Eternal Sun - open-source MMORPG needs coders (Software Development Job Offers)
- Open Source to Windows (C#)
Featured Entry