Earlier in this thread, in
this post, I had made public my curiosity for the criteria that holds good for a member to get the Member of the Month medallion. I had my reasons for believing that most probably it would be the number of posts, since a lot of short listed names or whose names had been put up for short listing were prolific in that sense.
A distinguished member of the forum, the Super mod actually, I shouldn't be shy taking her name, replied to my question, satisfying my curiosity to some extent, mentioning that it was the
contribution that a member made to the community that was held uppermost. I wasn't entirely satisfied by the reply, since I had observed otherwise, but chose not to comment further. Now after the selection of this month's Member of the Month, I cannot hold myself back but only can exihibit my surprise in this fashion. Reasons follow:
TheDude
Posts : 3,019
Rep Points : 101
Rep Power : 11
Solved Threads : 25
Code Snippets : 0
iamthwee
Posts : 4,912
Rep Points : 512
Rep Power : 18
Solved Threads : 332
Code Snippets : 4
ArkM
Posts : 1,343
Rep Points : 599
Rep Power : 8
Solved Threads : 210
Code Snippets : 1
Cohen
Posts : 717
Rep Points : 28
Rep Power : 2
Solved Threads : 37
Code Snippets : 0
I am surprised to know what such
contribution has the last member made that the others might have not ? *Head Rolling in amusement*
My commentary is not be taken with offense, not for anyone, if you can understand, Cohen, I hold nothing agaisnt you, I don't even know you well for me to do so. Nor is it the case that the other three personalities are my friends, I, again, do not even know them, their postings, well for them to be (or not to be). But the question of the selection criteria for the tag has once again surfaced in my mind.