It could help stop it flooding with bot posts or something though.. Otherwise they could make loads.. It could overwhelm the admins

Bots can also be programmed to avoid the delay resulting in the same problem. But us mere humans have to anxiously wait out delay

Yeah.. im just saying a bot could be a lot more a nuisance if it was able to report 3 posts a second or something. That would clog up the system. So it gives the admins time to reel in the bot before it gets to annoying.

More annoyingly, its like that for mods. I like to get like 10-20 spam threads all up in one go and delete them all, but i cant, because when you infract someone, it makes a thread, and sends a PM, incurring a wait. grrrrrrrrrr. have mentioned this to dani before.

When you infract someone and when you report a post, both, it creates a new thread. There are server resources consumed when adding a thread to the database, and therefore flood protection is necessary or else it could potentially take down the database. Especially with something such as reporting posts, which isn't limited to mods-only ... there's no way of knowing for sure whether or not it's automated. Someone could set up a greasemonkey script, couldn't they? (Unless I'm thinking of something else???)

Yeah but cant you reduce the infraction wait for mods to like 5s?

Likewise as those people who constantly post those threads about DVD players they could just create a single account and post a new thread every time instead of using one account for multiple threads. To me it seems the only people restricted by the 15s limit is humans. Bots can get around it. Even then if it is a bot then ~5s is reasonable for a human but would stop a bot that was mass spamming if that is how the spam software was authored.

I dont think its actually bots anyway methinks its people who get paid to do it.

Considering mods aren't ever bots, I think it'd be safe to write a quick script to let them do their job quickly. (It can't be that hard to write a check for the user's usergroup?)