I'm not sure why this would be. The new version loads a LOT faster, has fewer images, calls far fewer external JavaScript files, has far less advertising and contacts far less third party servers.
cscgal
The Queen of DaniWeb
19,418 posts since Feb 2002
Reputation Points: 1,474
Solved Threads: 229
I experienced some downtime yesterday, maybe this is related?
Nick Evan
Not a Llama
10,112 posts since Oct 2006
Reputation Points: 4,142
Solved Threads: 403
What browser / OS are you using?
cscgal
The Queen of DaniWeb
19,418 posts since Feb 2002
Reputation Points: 1,474
Solved Threads: 229
Im on IE6 using MyIE2 and it looks ok here (A lack of colours but THANKFULLY NOT VB4 so im not complaining)
The Dude
Nearly a Senior Poster
3,485 posts since Dec 2005
Reputation Points: 1,054
Solved Threads: 31
This site was developed by professional web dev team. Are you saying that the front-end wasn't tested in one of the main OS/browser combinations? I don't believe you! That would be, well, preposterous, wouldn't it?
And before anybody bangs on about the 'unfeasibility' of testing every possible combination - rubbish.
A partitioned machine running multiple OSes, each with a full bank of browsers shouldn't be beyond a dev company. However, is it something to do with FF's new release? Does the previous version react in the same way?
diafol
Rhod Gilbert Fan
7,735 posts since Oct 2006
Reputation Points: 1,168
Solved Threads: 1,070
> So you mean to say I'm lying ?
*facepalm*; sarcasm detection.....failed. :-)
> Its surely not anything to do with latest FF release
A couple a things we'd like to confirm:
- Have you tried flushing the browser cache?
- Does this happen only with *nix + FF or with *nix + any browser?
- Does programmingforums look the same way?
~s.o.s~
Failure as a human
11,938 posts since Jun 2006
Reputation Points: 3,281
Solved Threads: 732
The Browsershots web-based service is pretty awesome at doing this for a quick idea of compatibility across multiple OSes and browser clients - you give it the site URL, it gives you a ton of screenshots showing you how it looks.
I'm not involved in the site development side of DaniWeb, but would be very surprised if Dani (or the web design consultants) had not done compatibility testing.
And before anybody bangs on about the 'unfeasibility' of testing every possible combination - rubbish. A partitioned machine running multiple OSes, each with a full bank of browsers shouldn't be beyond a dev company. However, is it something to do with FF's new release? Does the previous version react in the same way?
happygeek
Freelance Word Punk
27,453 posts since Mar 2006
Reputation Points: 1,457
Solved Threads: 54
> So you mean to say I'm lying ?
> ...would be very surprised if Dani (or the web design consultants) had not done compatibility testing
Hah! I've managed to reel in both freshwater and seawater trouts!
diafol
Rhod Gilbert Fan
7,735 posts since Oct 2006
Reputation Points: 1,168
Solved Threads: 1,070
Hah! I've managed to reel in both freshwater and seawater trouts!
I know my plaice...
happygeek
Freelance Word Punk
27,453 posts since Mar 2006
Reputation Points: 1,457
Solved Threads: 54
Arch Linux / Firefox 3.6.3
I just finished installing Ubuntu 10 with FF 3.6.3 and do not see the problem shown in that screenshot. DaniWeb looks just like it does in Windows 7 and IE8.
Ancient Dragon
Retired & Loving It
30,038 posts since Aug 2005
Reputation Points: 5,662
Solved Threads: 2,340