943,812 Members | Top Members by Rank

Ad:
You are currently viewing page 1 of this multi-page discussion thread
Oct 27th, 2008
0

Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

Expand Post »
Standards:
No ad hominem attacks
No insults

An argument is, to quote the Monty Python sketch, "a connected series of statements to establish a definite proposition."

Please try to avoid the major logical fallacies.
Definition - Theory:
In science a theory is a testable model of the manner of interaction of a set of natural phenomena, capable of predicting future occurrences or observations of the same kind, and capable of being tested through experiment or otherwise verified through empirical observation.
Definition - Evolution:
Evolution is usually defined simply as changes in trait or gene frequency in a population of organisms from one generation to the next. However, "evolution" is often used to include the following additional claims:
1. Differences in trait composition between isolated populations over many generations may result in the origin of new species.
2. All living organisms alive today have descended from a common ancestor (or ancestral gene pool).

Various famous people say:
Quote ...
Judge a man by his questions rather than by his answers.
--Voltaire (1694-1778)
A definition is no proof.
--William Pinkney, American diplomat (1764-1822)
A theory is more impressive the greater the simplicity of its premises, the more different the kinds of things it relates and the more extended its range of applicability.
--Albert Einstein, 1949
If anyone wants to add anything to the definitions or rules, now is as good a time as any - or jump right in with your argument. Please feel free to argue with any part of this post.
Last edited by GrimJack; Oct 27th, 2008 at 11:05 pm.
Similar Threads
Featured Poster
Reputation Points: 1448
Solved Threads: 21
Posting Maven
GrimJack is offline Offline
2,735 posts
since Feb 2004
Oct 27th, 2008
0

Re: Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

I know many people mistakenly believe evolution is a fact while its actually nothing more than just a good (ok very good) theory. There is no way to prove evolution, just as there is no way to prove creationism. We can believe all we want but that doesn't make it fact. We can test short evolution durations, say between two or three generations or so but there is no way to show how (or if) one species evolves into an entirely different species.

I'm not arguing that evolution doesn't exit -- only that it isn't a proven fact.

Creationism, on the otherhand, is on an even shaker grounds than evolution. Its not even possible to create a theory about intelligent creation. I do think there was intelligent design when creating the universe. Something, or someone, had to create the universe -- it didn't just happen out of nothing. Even if you believe the Big Bang theory, someone had to create that mass that exploded.

My though is that the Bible correctly tells us who created the universe, but what it doesn't tell us is how it was created. We will never know the true answer to that, but it probably started with the Big Bang. When the Earth cooled down enough to support life then evolution took hold, and over a few billion years we humans evolved into what we are today.
Sponsor
Team Colleague
Featured Poster
Reputation Points: 5608
Solved Threads: 2282
Retired and Enjoying Life
Ancient Dragon is offline Offline
21,950 posts
since Aug 2005
Oct 27th, 2008
0

Re: Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

...And they lived happily ever after. The end.
Last edited by Aia; Oct 27th, 2008 at 11:54 pm. Reason: Making The end prettier
Aia
Reputation Points: 2224
Solved Threads: 218
Nearly a Posting Maven
Aia is offline Offline
2,304 posts
since Dec 2006
Oct 28th, 2008
0

Re: Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

Best argument for evolution: We've seen it happen and verified it many times in other animals like flies, which have lifespans short enough and have enough offspring per generation that we can see it quickly. Human beings just don't change fast enough, but if we've seen other living beings evolve, why couldn't we have too?

Worst argument against evolution: It doesn't explain everything, so we can toss the whole theory out. (I imagine that's one of the fallacies you listed. Haven't checked the link yet).
Featured Poster
Reputation Points: 2614
Solved Threads: 687
Posting Expert
VernonDozier is offline Offline
5,374 posts
since Jan 2008
Oct 28th, 2008
0

Re: Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

We've seen it happen and verified it many times in other animals like flies, which have lifespans short enough and have enough offspring per generation that we can see it quickly.
Can you provide a link?
Reputation Points: 358
Solved Threads: 89
Posting Shark
R0bb0b is offline Offline
986 posts
since Jun 2008
Oct 28th, 2008
0

Re: Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

Reputation Points: 116
Solved Threads: 93
Veteran Poster
hughv is offline Offline
1,132 posts
since Oct 2007
Oct 28th, 2008
0

Re: Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

...
Something, or someone, had to create the universe -- it didn't just happen out of nothing. Even if you believe the Big Bang theory, someone had to create that mass that exploded.
...
In that line of thinking, who created the creator?

Big Bang only relates to the universe we know, and the tiny fraction of time we think we understand. Evolution is an event of time and time is endless.
Last edited by vegaseat; Oct 28th, 2008 at 7:45 am.
Moderator
Reputation Points: 1333
Solved Threads: 1403
DaniWeb's Hypocrite
vegaseat is offline Offline
5,792 posts
since Oct 2004
Oct 28th, 2008
0

Re: Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

Genes change from one generation to the next. That is evolution and that we know is a fact. The purpose of these genes changing through the random selection of genetic material in the gametes during meiosis occurs in order for life to survive. Without changing genes (or evolution) through successive generations, all offspring would be identical to there parents and therefore, unable to run faster, jump higher, think quicker etc. Being different from one another allows for survival of the fittest, in which case if a predator is faster, then the faster prey will survive and hence, be more likely to pass the gene which made it faster to its offspring. Eventually this will create a faster animal and through thousands of generations a new branch of the family which it originally came.

One major factor which causes these separations of genetic similarity, is segregation or separation from the same family. This can be caused by land forms or different migration patterns. Eventually one group of the same family would have to adapt to different surroundings through survival of the fittest and therefore become a dissimilar family.

These above statements do not take into account random genetic mutation, which may also cause variation in genetic make up from one generation to the next.

I, personally, think that to deny evolution is just ignorance. And remember, the route word of ignorance is "Ignore". To simply ignore things that are as plane as day doesn't make sense.
Reputation Points: 86
Solved Threads: 8
Banned
steven woodman is offline Offline
442 posts
since Mar 2008
Oct 28th, 2008
0

Re: Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

100 Reasons why Evolution is so stupid
Some good points are mentioned in this (rather long) video, but no where near enough to stop me believing in evolution but personally, I dont think he knows what hes talking about 95% of the time
Last edited by William Hemsworth; Oct 28th, 2008 at 12:02 pm.
Reputation Points: 1429
Solved Threads: 129
Posting Virtuoso
William Hemsworth is offline Offline
1,542 posts
since Mar 2008
Oct 28th, 2008
1

Re: Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

I got about two minutes into that video and i can think of 100 reasons he is stupid. Man some people just dont get it.
Reputation Points: 86
Solved Threads: 8
Banned
steven woodman is offline Offline
442 posts
since Mar 2008

This thread is more than three months old

No one has posted to this discussion for at least three months. Please let old threads die and do not reply to them unless you feel you have something new and valuable to contribute that absolutely must be added to make the discussion complete. Otherwise, please start a new thread in this forum instead.
Message:
Previous Thread in Geeks' Lounge Forum Timeline: Helpminutes left! from a desperate mom!
Next Thread in Geeks' Lounge Forum Timeline: Happy new Year to All





About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Acceptable Use Policy
Forum Index | Build Custom RSS Feed


Follow us on Twitter


© 2011 DaniWeb® LLC