Unsolved Views: 12188
Offline Offline 
Offline My case in support of evolution is much simpler. And it works whether the creationists are right or not.
1) If there is no creator, then things must have evolved somehow.
2) No intelligent creator will just build everything first go: there will be trial runs, false starts, starting over, etc. That is evolution!
No need to prove that people are descended from apes (although a lot of people provide strong evidence in support of this).
The only thing needed to disprove my theory is proof of the existence of a creator and then proof that creator does everything on the first go.
If you read my post again, you will see that I did not claim my theory is proven. I noted the way to disprove my theory is to prove the existence of a creator, and then prove that creator does not require evolution. You are asserting that is the case, not offering proof. Offer proof of your assertion, and I will concede my theory is incorrect. Otherwise, I will maintain that it is not disproven.
If you prove the existence of such an unflawed creator, you will have disproved my theory and you will also have the option of finding and asking her.
And it works whether the creationists are right or not.
2) No intelligent creator will just build everything first go: there will be trial runs, false starts, starting over, etc.
1) If there is no creator, then things must have evolved somehow.
Offline No, I agree, it is not. But, the difference here, is that only one belief has an absence of evidence and that is creationism. there is tons of supporting evidence for evolution.
Offline 
