From what I've read, you definitely are not retarded...
It's either you can't type or you have six fingers on each hand and they get in the way!
zeroth
Nearly a Posting Virtuoso
1,226 posts since Mar 2005
Reputation Points: 343
Solved Threads: 40
Sorry, not going to hand over my email address to a company I've never even heard of. Enough harvesting for spam purposes going on as it is.
Religion is a means of explaining away things you don't understand in terms you do understand.
Once it gets organised it degenerates (or evolves, depends on who you are in the hierarchy) into a means for a few (whom are called priests to stay in generic terms) of controlling the masses through indoctrination and by keeping them unaware of reality.
Thus religion will create supernatural all knowing beings whom are claimed to be in contact with the priest cast, telling on all disgressions from the rules laid down by that priest cast on the general population. This (together with the statement that those rules are dictated by those supernatural beings) provides an easy way for the priesthood to control the population and gives them the power to do pretty much whatever they wish.
In such a system there's no place for scientific development as that would inevitably explain away the "miracles" the priests perform or claim the gods perform by means of logic and scientific evidence.
The denial by religions of evolution is one example of that denial and suppression of science by religion.
And yes, I was raised (semi)religiously but never forced to accept any religion and I didn't.
I will tolerate and respect any religion that tolerates and respects the fact that I don't share its ideals and ideas and don't wish to be the target of their indoctrination campaigns.
jwenting
duckman
8,392 posts since Nov 2004
Reputation Points: 1,662
Solved Threads: 337
I'll be waiting for the result.
nanosani
Unauthenticated Liar
1,830 posts since Jul 2004
Reputation Points: 45
Solved Threads: 56
religion not suppressing science?
Tell that to Galileo...
Other scientists have been killed as heretics for daring to proclaim things that didn't fit in the framework of the ruling religion.
Religious groups in the US and elsewhere want to ban evolution theory from being taught in schools as heretical.
jwenting
duckman
8,392 posts since Nov 2004
Reputation Points: 1,662
Solved Threads: 337
you are right about it being a sensitive subject, moderate, and it's getting more so daily. Secularism is the new "religion" in the US and growing fast. Secularists don't want any religious conotations in society at all.
I think we should all live and let live. I can't understand why anyone needs to palm off their beliefs on anyone else, but some people cannot stand it if somebody is free...
zeroth
Nearly a Posting Virtuoso
1,226 posts since Mar 2005
Reputation Points: 343
Solved Threads: 40
Correct zeroth. I've nothing against any religion (like I said) nor against religios conotations in society as long as that religion doesn't force its ideas and ideals on me.
For example, I've nothing against an easter bunny, but don't expect me to go to church on easter.
I've nothing against Muslims praying in the subway, but don't ask me to do the same or to condone them blocking the tunnels.
And no, I'm no atheist. Atheism is a religion too, as atheists have a religious disbelief in the existence of gods.
I keep my options open... Being pragmatic I have concluded that every religion out there preaches harsher punishment after death for believers in false gods than it does for people that believe in no gods at all.
That means you're better off not joining any religion than you are joining the wrong one and as there's so many religions gambling on choosing the correct one is too risky.
jwenting
duckman
8,392 posts since Nov 2004
Reputation Points: 1,662
Solved Threads: 337
Hello,
I am Episcopal, and a believer in Jesus Christ.
What I find interesting are people who claim not to be religious, and yet want to have Christmas off and Easter vacation.
I see different religions as different paths to God, such as Buddhist, Judism, and Arabic religions.
But religion can also be the "bond" of a cruel force. During the middle ages, Catholics were very meddling in society... what happened to Galieo for example, or the crusades, or the concept of indulgances. Leaders of the religion can turn the base into a collective weapon.
I am not sure that science can explain everything that happens, such as how personality develops inside people. I also think that certain scientific quests, such as cloning, will create great problems for our society. We do not have the wisdom as a society to control that power. Take a look at Jurassic Park if you need a very fundamental exam of that theory. OR look at the terminator movies... would you really like AI like that? How dare we think as humans that if a machine could define an enemy, that the AI machine would not seek to defend itself?
I do think it is important for a religion to be in a society. Not a state sponsored one, but a balance of duties and responsibility.
Christian
kc0arf
Posting Virtuoso
1,937 posts since Mar 2004
Reputation Points: 121
Solved Threads: 57
J, I love options. And I believe that religion and science must tolerate one another. It´s a balance, but they both must be openminded to maintain the balance, sort of like politics. Like politics, it doesn´t always work out but in the long run, everything seems to progress.
The way I look at it, all the religions (with the exception of those like naturism, which have more than one god) say that there is one god. If that is true, aren´t they all talking about the same god? And if that´s true, then what is all the fuss about.
It doesn´t seem to matter, whatever group people are in are always mad at the people in the other groups.
zeroth
Nearly a Posting Virtuoso
1,226 posts since Mar 2005
Reputation Points: 343
Solved Threads: 40