944,152 Members | Top Members by Rank

View Poll Results: What Operating System do you use
Windows - 100% 63 78.75%
OSX (any version) 10 12.50%
GNU/Linux (any Distro) 30 37.50%
Open Solaris (any Distro) 4 5.00%
BSD (any Distro) 6 7.50%
Duh, I don't know. It's what came with the computer! 1 1.25%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 80. You may not vote on this poll

Ad:
You are currently viewing page 5 of this multi-page discussion thread; Jump to the first page
Oct 7th, 2009
0
Re: Windows? Why would anyone run Windows?
I totally agree with scru

Quote ...
And no, it's not only hobbyists who "can afford to be extreme" about such things. Business owners like myself
Quote ...
So we're talking about business owners now and not IT professionals? My comment was about people who are forced to follow the rules of a client or employer, not people who make their own rules. If you have the option to choose your favorite tool, more power to you. Most of us are not so lucky.
Have you ever tried to administer a linux or unix network? its hell. Windows server has it right when it active directory,and its management tools in my opinion.

P.S

re the results of the poll. 90% use windows. And the sum total of all other systems is less than half of the amount of users who said they used windows
Last edited by jbennet; Oct 7th, 2009 at 7:57 pm.
Moderator
Featured Poster
Reputation Points: 1800
Solved Threads: 575
Moderator
jbennet is offline Offline
16,534 posts
since Apr 2005
Oct 7th, 2009
-4
Re: Windows? Why would anyone run Windows?
Click to Expand / Collapse  Quote originally posted by Tom Gunn ...
Can you prove this without any weasel tricks like claiming that anyone who prefers Windows is ignorant?

So we're talking about business owners now and not IT professionals? My comment was about people who are forced to follow the rules of a client or employer, not people who make their own rules. If you have the option to choose your favorite tool, more power to you. Most of us are not so lucky.

Predictably, you missed the point and tried to twist it into a straw man for your Windows bashing.
Tom, I know what I see, and that is that people with strong technical knowledge, people who I have a lot of respect for, think that way. And as a business owner, I know what I'd run. As an IT guy I know what I'd recommend (if I was still in IT). Yep, I've got the option, and I took it.

As to the Strawmen, if Windows is as bad as I think it is, why shouldn't I tell people? From a Christian viewpoint I would be totally wrong not to "pass the word."

Click to Expand / Collapse  Quote originally posted by Tom Gunn ...
Yes, intolerant. You cannot be right about an opinion, because opinions are subjective. In your opinion Microsoft products are garbage, and you have a few bullet points that justify your opinion. Not respecting different opinions, like those of the people who prefer Windows, is intolerant.
It's not an opinion. Can you refute that:

1) Windows is the most virus prone operating system
2) Windows is the most insecure operating system
3) Windows requires more maintenance than any other operating system
4) Windows is the only operating system that suffers from Spyware
5) Windows is the only operating system that is produced by Microsoft

Forget about arguments about numbers, popularity, and all that junk. Can you refute any of the arguments above (let's forget number 5, it was there only to make a point).
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 0
Junior Poster in Training
The Mad Hatter is offline Offline
84 posts
since Sep 2009
Oct 7th, 2009
-2

Musicians

Click to Expand / Collapse  Quote originally posted by KonkaNok ...
>.. And then consider that Musicians don't tend to be geeks, and ask yourself why so many of them use Macs? It's because they work. And because musicians can't afford to loose their work to a virus.

What rubbish. If anyone buys easily into trends, it's musicians.. and anyway, you can't talk about the entire freakin' music industry as if it's dominated by Macs. It's not.
Musicians? You've got to be kidding. Musicians don't buy into trends. No, let me correct that. Professional musicians don't buy into trends. They can't afford to. Did you ever hear the joke:

"How does a Musician streamline his/her car? The remove the Pizza sign from the roof."

When a professional musician spends money, they do it carefully. Oh, there are a few, less and 1/10th of 1 percent who make good money, like the Rolling Stones. The average professional musician barely makes a living, so when they pick where to spend their money, well you can bet it won't be on a trend.
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 0
Junior Poster in Training
The Mad Hatter is offline Offline
84 posts
since Sep 2009
Oct 7th, 2009
-2
Re: Windows? Why would anyone run Windows?
Click to Expand / Collapse  Quote originally posted by scru ...
Okay, I didn't read much of what was said (I tend not to pay much attention to fanboys). But anybody who says things like "Anyone who has a good understanding of operating systems in addition to Windows, generally won't use Windows" and "Linux driver support is far superior to Windows" as arguments for Linux should be instantly dismissed. It's not to say that there aren't quite a few very good arguments for Linux; they're just not these.
Most of the techies I know don't use Windows. Won't use Windows. Except for gaming, which is a specialty application. As to drivers, I can pick up a copy of Moon OS and install it on most hardware, without the need to chase drivers. You can't do that with Windows.

So you can't say that those aren't damned good arguments for Linux. Now OSX has extremely limited driver support, but it's only supposed to run on Apple hardware, so driver support isn't an issue.

Click to Expand / Collapse  Quote originally posted by scru ...
Why would the average user want to have an understanding of how operating systems work? Most people just want to get on a computer, use it, and get off. As far as I know, this is how it works with Windows (and Mac). It's possible with some tame versions of Linux too. Nobody wants to know what happening behind the scenes to allow them to do that.
They wouldn't. The average user just wants to use their computer. And that's why OSX and Linux are superior. With Windows you need to know what it's doing - or you have to hire someone to fix it. With Linux and OSX, well, they just work.

Click to Expand / Collapse  Quote originally posted by scru ...
Linux driver support is a far cry from superior. I don't understand how a rational person can come to the conclusion that it is. Do you realize that most Linux drivers are practically hacks because most hardware manufacturers don't bother to support linux (so the community has to do it themselves) and the ones that do write drivers so horrible that they break your system (nvidia and x server, anyone?)?

I don't get how Linux fanatics constantly complain about FUD when they are the worst perpetrators.
I don't see how any rational person could consider Windows driver support to be superior. I've spent all too much time chasing drivers when installing Windows. I don't have to do that with Linux.
As to the community written drivers, I've found many of them to be superior to the drivers supplied by the hardware OEMs for Windows. Windows wireless drivers in particular have been an issue.
Oh, and of course there's some of the ATI video drivers, which appeared to have been written by an intern.
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 0
Junior Poster in Training
The Mad Hatter is offline Offline
84 posts
since Sep 2009
Oct 7th, 2009
-2

Networks

Click to Expand / Collapse  Quote originally posted by jbennet ...
Have you ever tried to administer a linux or unix network? its hell. Windows server has it right when it active directory,and its management tools in my opinion.

P.S

re the results of the poll. 90% use windows. And the sum total of all other systems is less than half of the amount of users who said they used windows
Yes, I've administered a Linux network. I didn't find it any harder than administering a Windows network.

As to the number of people using Windows - I would have been surprised if the numbers had have been different here. I do know of websites where the Windows users are less than 50% of visitors.

Things are changing. And probably will change further, because Microsoft is under a lot of financial stress right now.
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 0
Junior Poster in Training
The Mad Hatter is offline Offline
84 posts
since Sep 2009
Oct 7th, 2009
0
Re: Windows? Why would anyone run Windows?
Most of the techies I know don't use Windows. Won't use Windows. Except for gaming, which is a specialty application. As to drivers, I can pick up a copy of Moon OS and install it on most hardware, without the need to chase drivers. You can't do that with Windows.

So you can't say that those aren't damned good arguments for Linux. Now OSX has extremely limited driver support, but it's only supposed to run on Apple hardware, so driver support isn't an issue.


They wouldn't. The average user just wants to use their computer. And that's why OSX and Linux are superior. With Windows you need to know what it's doing - or you have to hire someone to fix it. With Linux and OSX, well, they just work.


I don't see how any rational person could consider Windows driver support to be superior. I've spent all too much time chasing drivers when installing Windows. I don't have to do that with Linux.
As to the community written drivers, I've found many of them to be superior to the drivers supplied by the hardware OEMs for Windows. Windows wireless drivers in particular have been an issue.
Oh, and of course there's some of the ATI video drivers, which appeared to have been written by an intern.
Where to start, where to start...

You simply aren't going to fool anyone by claiming "most techies use Linux". Your own poll proves you wrong. Perhaps "most people who enjoy tinkering around in their OS" is more appropriate, but then the value of the argument is considerably diluted (and it wasn't even much to begin with).

As to your "chasing drivers" FUD, I challenge you to prove your assertion with this MoonOS versus Windows Vista (or 7 if you feel brave). I don't get what you mean by chasing drivers at all. Plug in a device, and have it automatically recognised. In the rare case that it isn't, pop in a CD or go to manufacturer's website and download it there. Unless you're talking about legacy hardware, and if that's the case don't even bother to engage me again.

Also, why do you need to know what Windows is doing in order to use it? How come Linux fanatics always seem to have these exaggerated nightmarish experiences with Windows that other people just don't seem to have? Can you give me an example of something that "just works" on Linux but gives people hell to use on Windows? You do that and the next person I meet wanting to do that thing, I will point them to Linux without bias.

As to wireless drivers being an issue on Windows, really? Google "Ubuntu wireless" and have a look at the countless forum threads and mailing lists of sob stories. Maybe it's just me though; I've had 3 Windows laptops (from different manufacturers) and none of them has ever had a problem with wireless drivers.

If you want me to do your job for you, I can actually list some good reasons to use [strikethrough]Linux[/strikethrough] Unix-like systems, in contrast to anti-MS rants, strawman arguments and FUD.
Last edited by scru; Oct 7th, 2009 at 9:31 pm.
Featured Poster
Reputation Points: 975
Solved Threads: 140
Posting Virtuoso
scru is offline Offline
1,624 posts
since Feb 2007
Oct 7th, 2009
0
Re: Windows? Why would anyone run Windows?
OK, so I get up, shower, eat, and open up my email client. Number 4 from the top is a Daniweb email telling me about the wonderful topics currently being discussed - here's the list:

* Prevent programs from saving to certain folder? in Windows Vista and Windows 7
* Win7: To Migrate or Not to Migrate? in Windows Vista and Windows 7
* Error Code 8024402c in Windows Vista and Windows 7
* connecting to localhost` in Windows Vista and Windows 7
* Cant install any programs... Help! in Windows Vista and Windows 7
* Windows 7 Regional Themes in Windows Vista and Windows 7
* Hi every one in Windows Vista and Windows 7
* When I boot computer Error Appear. in Windows Vista and Windows 7
* Add-on for Windows7 File Manager in Windows Vista and Windows 7
* Laptop wont start.... in Windows Vista and Windows 7
* Installing Ram Problem in Windows Vista and Windows 7
* Hello everyone problem with audio on vista home in Windows Vista and Windows 7
* Issues with moving from XP to Vista in Windows Vista and Windows 7
* Vista + Fedora - Hibernate in Windows Vista and Windows 7
* windows 7 display driver in Windows Vista and Windows 7
* vista shared folders in Windows Vista and Windows 7
* Ballmer Won't Call Google by Name in Interview in Windows Vista and Windows 7
* cd tray wont open.vista home basic in Windows Vista and Windows 7
* Windows 7 Blue Screen in Windows Vista and Windows 7
* invalid boot.in file in Windows Vista and Windows 7
* Icons on Desktop layered with another strange icon in ! Windows Vista and Windows 7
* Windows 7 Wallpapers in Windows Vista and Windows 7
* bad image in Windows Vista and Windows 7
* Is the FSF shooting the open-source community in the foot? in Windows Vista and Windows 7
* My Vista became incredible slow in Windows Vista and Windows 7

Now quite frankly, this list is enough to make me want to puke. This site is supposedly for geeks. Well, real geeks don't run Windows. Real geeks don't run any Microsoft products, because we understand enough about operating systems and application programs, to know that Microsoft products are total, absolute, pieces of garbage.

Microsloth (my pet name for them, because their product delivery dates are so often late) is probably the least competent corporation on the planet. Let's take a look at some of their products:

1) XBox360 - the most badly designed game console ever.
2) Microsoft Windows 1.0 - 5 years behind GEM and GEOS
3) Internet Exploder 3 - the only browser with a file size limit on downloads, curiously it was set low enough that you couldn't download Netscape with it.
4) Microsoft Outlook & Express - the most advanced virus transmission tools ever devised.
5) Internet Exploder 6 - Totally unable to render standards compliant web pages.
6) Microsoft Office 2007 SP1 - the only ODF "capable" application that can't properly write ODF files. This one is particularly note able because 20 other applications can do it - but the biggest software company on the planet was too incompetent to manage to do it right.
7) Security - let's face it - no other operating system on the planet has the security problems that Windows has, because they all use a proper security model, while Windows uses something that appears to have been designed by a drunken Zebra. Oh, and for all those who claim that Linux and OSX will suffer just as many virus problems when they get popular, well you're wrong. Linux and OSX were designed securely from the ground up. Even Microsoft admits that Windows was not designed to be secure.

I could continue - but you should have gotten the idea by this point. Windows is a total and utter piece of garbage, designed by an incompetent corporation, which wouldn't be able to survive if it hadn't managed to turn a clone of another operating system into a monopoly position in the market place.

What you have to ask yourself is, what are you going to do if Microsoft crashes and burns? Their year end financials were not that good, and if the first quarter results end up being what I think they will be, there is a significant possibility that this could happen. Don't laugh. Think. Where was General Motors 6 years ago? Did anyone think 6 years ago that General Motors would end up in Chapter 11 Bankruptcy protection?

Oh, I don't think Microsoft will die this year, or the next, but you should start putting together an exit plan just in case, and you this is a good option, it will run on damned near any hardware you can through at it, and even autodetected my wireless card, and ran it, with no need to search for drivers. You won't get that from Windows.
(emphasis mine)
I actually just read this. It might as well have been:
Quote ...
I'M AN IDIOT.
I'm pretty sure GM wasn't raking in billions (yes, that's a b) in profits 6 years ago.

But you'd love MS to fail wouldn't you? Then people might actually give a crap about Linux (and that might just be enough for it to become usable; it's either that or people stop using computers).
Featured Poster
Reputation Points: 975
Solved Threads: 140
Posting Virtuoso
scru is offline Offline
1,624 posts
since Feb 2007
Oct 7th, 2009
0
Re: Windows? Why would anyone run Windows?
Quote ...
Where was General Motors 6 years ago? Did anyone think 6 years ago that General Motors would end up in Chapter 11 Bankruptcy protection?
YES. Everyone in the whole world (seeminly apart from those in america) knew that american cars are CRAP. GM has been in decline since the 1970s when Japan became the world leader.

Turnover:
Quote ...
2000 -1.3%
2001 -1.0%
2002 −0.9%
2003 −2.1%
2004 −1.0%
2005 −4.0%
2006 −8.7%
2007 −6.3%
2008 −22.9%
Last edited by jbennet; Oct 7th, 2009 at 9:49 pm.
Moderator
Featured Poster
Reputation Points: 1800
Solved Threads: 575
Moderator
jbennet is offline Offline
16,534 posts
since Apr 2005
Oct 7th, 2009
3
Re: Windows? Why would anyone run Windows?
Name:  troll.jpeg
Views: 61
Size:  3.4 KB
Moderator
Featured Poster
Reputation Points: 1142
Solved Threads: 982
Most Valuable Poster
crunchie is offline Offline
12,165 posts
since Feb 2004
Oct 7th, 2009
2

Mad Hatter you suck the boaby

Your nonsense about true geeks etc is utterly pathetic, are you really suggesting that out of the 90% or woteva of the computer market that use windows, 0% of them are geeks?

I use a computer to do other things. All the OS does is enable me to do other things. I dont want to spend time faffing around making everything work, I want to do things that are fun or useful. Dont give me all this "linux is a doddle" crap, because Ive seen linux users do their thing, and its hard work, its a load of command line, compiling, and general nonsense to get even the most basic things setup. Which is all you are going to be able to get setup of course, because unless you want to surf the net, or watch video/music, code or run a server, theres nothing you can do on linux that cant be done far better on windows or osx. Even osx is pretty weak compared to windows 7, the only reason to use it is if all you do is surf/word process/video use (and have a thing for mac hardware/osx layout), or are a music producer (who can afford a pro version, because of course, normal macs now dont have the basic requirements for music production). Adobe dont care to code properly for mac, so even photo editing is better on windows.

Ive written too much already and I havent even begun to talk about all the completely nonsensical statements you have made about windows. You have the views of someone who last used windows in 1999, which, Im sure by no coincidence, is when this microsoft bashing was last cool.
Last edited by retrend; Oct 7th, 2009 at 11:00 pm.
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 0
Newbie Poster
retrend is offline Offline
2 posts
since Oct 2009

This thread is more than three months old

No one has posted to this discussion for at least three months. Please let old threads die and do not reply to them unless you feel you have something new and valuable to contribute that absolutely must be added to make the discussion complete. Otherwise, please start a new thread in this forum instead.
Message:
Previous Thread in Geeks' Lounge Forum Timeline: What is that?
Next Thread in Geeks' Lounge Forum Timeline: How fast can you type?





About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Acceptable Use Policy
Forum Index | Build Custom RSS Feed


Follow us on Twitter


© 2011 DaniWeb® LLC