943,451 Members | Top Members by Rank

Ad:
You are currently viewing page 1 of this multi-page discussion thread
Aug 24th, 2009
0

The Ubuntu Welfare Program

Expand Post »
Since its inception in 2004, Ubuntu has been the beneficiary in what seems like a bottomless money pit for South African entrepreneur, Mark Shuttleworth via his commercial support and development venture, Canonical. Since Canonical, Ltd. isn't an American publicly-owned company (and I don't know South African law), it's unlikely that a full disclosure of profits and losses is forthcoming. I have read that the investment made so far is approximately $20 million US.

How long can anyone keep pumping money into a project that might not ever turn a profit?

Red Hat is the world's most successful Linux-oriented company and has turned its open source business into a very profitable one with licensing, professional services and support, training and certification and other products like JBOSS.

Although if you think about it, Shuttleworth might have the money to burn for a while since he blew $20 million US to go into space and to the International Space Station in 2002. Apparently he doesn't look for a return on investment for everything he does.

No one knows for sure, except Shuttleworth and his accountant, whether there's any hope that Ubuntu and Canonical will ever be self-sufficient entities. My guess is that it will take a few more years with the current economic downturn to realize any profits from either venture and I'm not sure whether Ubuntu will ever make money or is even expected to.

I'm willing to speak with someone from Canonical or Ubuntu but so far have had no luck in making a connection with anyone for an interview via phone, email or The Frugal Tech Show.

What do you think?
Will the Ubuntu project eventually lose its bankroll or will Shuttleworth maintain the piggy bank for it?
Is Canonical profitable?
Write back and let me know what you think.
Similar Threads
Reputation Points: 94
Solved Threads: 8
Practically a Master Poster
khess is offline Offline
638 posts
since Apr 2008
Aug 24th, 2009
0
Re: The Ubuntu Welfare Program
He's bloody rich and is doing it for the thrill.
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 0
Light Poster
dandart is offline Offline
40 posts
since Oct 2008
Aug 24th, 2009
0
Re: The Ubuntu Welfare Program
In case you didnt know, Canonical is protitable. So that makes the discussion pointless.
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 0
Newbie Poster
zelrik is offline Offline
1 posts
since Aug 2009
Aug 24th, 2009
0
Re: The Ubuntu Welfare Program
How would one know if it's profitable or not?
Reputation Points: 94
Solved Threads: 8
Practically a Master Poster
khess is offline Offline
638 posts
since Apr 2008
Aug 25th, 2009
0
Re: The Ubuntu Welfare Program
I'm not sure what the point of your blog entry is, other than to point out that Shuttleworth has the money to go to the ISS... Canonical may turn a profit... Or it may not.

"How long can anyone keep pumping money into a project that might not ever turn a profit?"... Until they run out of money, or until they decide not to.

What does welfare have to do with anything in this article? Shuttleworth has his money and has the right to spend or invest (or waste) it, whatever the case may be, however he wants.

Ubuntu may never make money. Canonical may or may not ever make money. Who cares? Ubuntu is a great thing for those who like it. If you don't like it, don't use it. I'm pretty sure Canonical and Shuttleworth don't want to force Ubuntu on you if you don't want it. Take it or leave it. It is a valuable thing that is offered to you for free.

I think Canonical will probably lose money in the current economic situation (who knows, though).

Shuttleworth will probably continue to fund it - because he can, despite Canonical's profitability. I hope he does.
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 0
Newbie Poster
rochestersoftex is offline Offline
1 posts
since Aug 2009
Aug 26th, 2009
0
Re: The Ubuntu Welfare Program
If you look at "who we are" on Canonical, most Bio's say: "Based in London", including Mark! DistroWatch lists origin as: Isle of Man (UK Crown Dependency).
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 0
Newbie Poster
jimwelchok is offline Offline
2 posts
since Aug 2009
Aug 26th, 2009
0
Re: The Ubuntu Welfare Program
I'm probably not as well informed as other readers (my first comment on first read article) but if Ubuntu is a significant part of the Open Source community (I think it is) it would seem that profit is more of a personal option/preference for anyone involved with Ubuntu including Shuttleworth. If the current construct he has is working and sustainable - I'm really glad that it works. Ubuntu has allowed my wife and I to both completely abandon the windoze swindle (we both own our own businesses (IT related). I would prefer to contribute (as I see fit) to Ubuntu to keep it alive and viable than to see it become a money trap.
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 0
Newbie Poster
brubuntu is offline Offline
1 posts
since Aug 2009
Aug 26th, 2009
0
Re: The Ubuntu Welfare Program
Hello zelrik,

How do you know that Canonical is profitable? This may be the case however I'm curious what is your source from which this claim is made.

Cheers!
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 0
Newbie Poster
timinski is offline Offline
1 posts
since Aug 2009
Aug 28th, 2009
0
Re: The Ubuntu Welfare Program
Hello,

not to be polemic, but up to my knowledge, Windows Vista cost has been esteemed of:

10'000'000'000 USD:

http://lvlug.org/pipermail/lvlug/200...er/028748.html

The result is one operating system that one third of the user replace with the previous version

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/08...ws_xp_vista_7/

No comment

Bye
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 0
Newbie Poster
bart.nicolotti is offline Offline
2 posts
since May 2009
Aug 28th, 2009
0
Re: The Ubuntu Welfare Program
Perhaps you have been pro Bush for too long? The concept of charity is not to make money. The idea is to help another human being.

It is sad that you cannot see this.

Mark Heinemann
Reputation Points: 10
Solved Threads: 0
Newbie Poster
as901 is offline Offline
1 posts
since Aug 2009

This thread is more than three months old

No one has posted to this discussion for at least three months. Please let old threads die and do not reply to them unless you feel you have something new and valuable to contribute that absolutely must be added to make the discussion complete. Otherwise, please start a new thread in this forum instead.
Message:
Previous Thread in IT Professionals' Lounge Forum Timeline: Reading a 200 year old newspaper in the hot tub
Next Thread in IT Professionals' Lounge Forum Timeline: FYP





About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Acceptable Use Policy
Forum Index | Build Custom RSS Feed


Follow us on Twitter


© 2011 DaniWeb® LLC