Hi everyone,
My questions are:
1. If Alice could have done something before her report is submitted to her academic supervisor, what do you think she should do?
(given the fact that she shouldn't breach the company's policy but at the same time, she certainly doesn't want to fail)
What alice should have done is to get a letter from her supervisor or human resource that she had already received adequate training but she is unable to disclose information about it due to company policy.
If she submits that letter to the university, the university would accept it.
2. Is Brooke's action legal and/or ethical?
It is a legal one as if the company is publically listed what she writes in her paper about mergers and their financial situation maybe considered priveleged information and if the company wants to take it a step further report her for leaking commercial secrets should their shares fall on the release of her report thus making her the scapegoat
Is the IT admin's action of exposing someone's work (Alice's report) legal in this case?
It depends as if she was using the computer on the company's premises then they can pretty much do what they like.
If she had logged on to the company's network from say her home computer and the admin staff took the file from her computer then the admin staff would have broken the law and if they want to take action against her the file would be inadmissable(in the U.S) thus she would walk but her reputation would probably be tarnished.
This kind of situations are common. You see like myself i am currently building clones of commercial softwares but the people i work for made me sign a confidentiality agreement not to release the name of the company or the people and organisations i work for.
Hmm maybe i should have been a lawyer
Richard West
*****************************************************