I was refering to technical analysis of stocks verses fundamental analysis.

Technical analysis uses mathematical equation(s) using historical numerical data (almost always only price & volume), and attempts to predict the stocks direction, or future price. Technical analysts believe that anything and everything there is to be publicly & legally known (and some hidden knowledge too) about a stock is already in the price and volume, therefore theoretically this should work.

Fundamentalists believe that reviewal of financial documents, price to earnings, customer relations, market, sector, industry, unions, government regulations, etc. need to be reviewed and taken into consideration, and a subjective decision is made.

Majority of Wall Street purports to be fundamental analysts. Truth is, most major sell side brokers have computers that pull triggers for buy and sell actions, humans never see... I know... I wrote some of them :mrgreen:

As for picking tech industry stocks, I shy away from pegging myself to tech despite my background in tech. I am afraid to get enamoured by something just because I think it is cool and exciting...

I use some basic fundamental analysis to narrow down the number of stocks, then run it through my trusty little "black box". Spits out buy and sell signals, and then I go from there. Very methodical, and I stick to it.

Oh, alright, sorry, never caught onto what your real question was and HEY, I just learned something. I would have to say since the fundamental sounds more the safe way to play it, I'd have to be a fundamentalist, with all the reviews of past financial stocking and such, so okay.

Adobe has just bought Macromedia for 3.4 billion, you might want to consider Adobe

Already am about to, just need to contact Ameritrade and see how things are coming along with the finding of the missing tape, believe it or not, they informed me my customer information was on that via my backup email.

I told them I'd create a new one, they said they couldn't do that so IDK.

Wait a minute! :evil: you just said you perfer fundamental to technical! You can't sit on the fence buddy! :lol: If you play fundamental, you hold on, and do long term - no quick (a la ADBE) buck pal! You need to hold on to your stocks for 10 years, and make sure you get all those little dividents reinvested...

I personally would not touch ADBE and MACR with a 10' pole any more...

The smart money is already done, the only person making anything there is going to be the brokers.

If you take a look at both of the charts, you will see they started moving on the 5th of April...ADBE down, and MACR going up. That is when the people in the know started "playing" - but the volume would not have given it away...

On the 15th, they both go really crazy, when the street gets a wind of it. (tell me if that is not inside trading, eh?!) On the 18th it is announced.

The chance that either will continue on their direction after 15 days, is very very unlikely...

So, technical analysis. A fundamental analyst would have NEVER have noticed this on time. Hell, they won't know about it till end of the quarter when the 10Ks and 10Qs are filed! :mrgreen:

In technical analysis, a simple scan with MA would gone nuts on the night of 15th, and (if I still had money) I would have dumped everything into MACR. A more complex tool would have set bells off (and it did for all the street brokers), paged you, called your mother to reach you, sent you a fax, and filled your car just so you can make the trade...

ALL the information -including insider trading, the street brokers getting wind of the action, etc. ALL of it was in the price and volume of the stocks.

THAT is why I LOVE technical analysis. :cheesy:

Well really, I realize that I am fundamental and the technical analysis you made provides to me that maybe it isn't such the good idea I was thinking about.

I was thinking of maybe getting ADBE because of its acquisition, but over the last few days I haven't seen much improvement (as you also provided that ADBE down, MACR is up right now.)

But anyway, Ameritrade got back to me and end up finding my information on one of the three of the four missing tapes that were recovered, so basically I am back and ready to go. To be honest, yes, I am going to try and take maybe a risk at Adobe if it at all goes up, but things aren't looking up right now.

I want to try Forex at the same time so that I can get acquainted with foreign currency exchanging and such.

Although I don´t play the market anymore (too much time involved to do it right) I can tell you a method that will help you in decisions. You need to have more than one process so that they complement each other.

Go to an analysis group web page that provides stock charts, which you can customize as to length of graph, etc., and follow the stock that you interested in with three other similar stocks overlaid. An old example of this was back when IBM PC came out and was using PC-DOS. If you overlaid these two graphs (with at least two others that were related) you could see the trends. It´s actually possible to predict with this method when the tops and bottoms will come. It´s a dangerous game to pick tops and bottoms but it´s REAL profitable if you can do it.

Disclaimer: You can always get burned in the stock market, that´s why I recommend more than one indicator process for any decision. But this one does work most of the time. Two requirements are that you know the industry that you are dealing with and know the relationships between the companies that you are comparing.

Good luck to all...

That sounds like a great piece of useful information, I never though of anything like that. So you mean like to apply 2 things that are like, work together. Not sure, but maybe something like YHOO to GOOG (which you probably already know is Yahoo! and Google.) I am understanding what your saying, just cannot match anything up right.

I will check the analysis sites and apply this form of method the next time I trade and see what results are generated. Thanks again.

Yes, you´ve got the general idea. I would not do less than four. I can´t think of the site I used to do this but it was one of the analysis sites with graphs, or chart analysis and it was free.

In any case, you can google up a site that works. What you are looking for is one that lets you overlay the graphs of the companies that you are interested in on the same graph. You can change the chart periods and other features to see the TRENDS, which is what you are looking for. I remember doing one with Microsoft, IBM, Cisco and one other, to do trades on the tops and bottoms of Microsoft. MS doesn´t work the same anymore because the market conditions have changed but back then it was a pretty steady climber that would repeat the ups and downs to the extent I was able to read the overlaid graphs, with my own interpretation of the market, and do some pretty accurate predictions on when to trade.

It really wasn´t all that hard, although I repeat the warning (and I´m certain you are already aware of it) that this type of trade is seriously risky. If you guess wrong, you loss big time. (Just trying to protect those that night read this that are less knowledgable about stocks - it´s just legal bookmaking, after all (I´m not kidding, it works exactly the same way.)

I would say this is good if I am investing in a sector fund, but not on an individual stock.

The scenarios, with different results. Let's take Google & Yahoo.

Google is selected as the Federal Government's official Search Engine.
What happens to Google's price?
What happens to Yahoo's price?

A new Gartner research document comes out and indicates that Google & Yahoo are the best and only places to invest for online marketing.
What happens to Google's price?
What happens to Yahoo's price?

So the prices are not tied together per se. I can look at the sector, or industry, but individuals compared would create a havoc, at least in my mind.

I would have to keep track of all activities in the public to make sure the divergence is not from a negative impact on my stock, but from a positive impact on the "baseline" stocks.

I venture to say that you got lucky with Microsoft, IBM, Cisco combo. Microsoft and IBM slightly overlap, but Cisco is clearly a separate industry.

Maybe overlaping with the industry or sector itself would be a tool. It would show how well the stock is doing amongst it's peers.

On the road I use bigcharts dot com.