| | |
Windows? Why would anyone run Windows?
| View Poll Results: What Operating System do you use | |||
| Windows - 100% | | 59 | 78.67% |
| OSX (any version) | | 9 | 12.00% |
| GNU/Linux (any Distro) | | 29 | 38.67% |
| Open Solaris (any Distro) | | 4 | 5.33% |
| BSD (any Distro) | | 6 | 8.00% |
| Duh, I don't know. It's what came with the computer! | | 1 | 1.33% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 75. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
0
#12 Oct 6th, 2009
•
•
•
•
I'm curious. You seem so sure, but you don't say why, and your assurance is totally at variance with my own experience. In fact I'll state straight out that Linux is easier to use than Windows.
Eveything worked straight away when I installed Microsoft Vista Home Premium. There were no additional packages to install nor did I have to tweek the os to make it work with my computer.
I still have my computer dual booting with Fedora 11, but I have Vista set as the default os. The only time I boot into Fedora now is so that I can test compile some programs on *nix. Otherwise I won't bother with all the hassle.
Don't PM me with questions -- you might get a nasty PM in response. If you have a question then post it in one of the forums.
•
•
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 64
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
•
•
•
•
I tried two different distributions of *nix (Fedora 11 and Ubuntu) over a whole week and neither of them worked the way I wanted them to. I have a 64-bit computer with 5 gig ram and 750 gig hd, I could not get the sound to work right nor would it play movies on dvd drive.
Eveything worked straight away when I installed Microsoft Vista Home Premium. There were no additional packages to install nor did I have to tweek the os to make it work with my computer.
I still have my computer dual booting with Fedora 11, but I have Vista set as the default os. The only time I boot into Fedora now is so that I can test compile some programs on *nix. Otherwise I won't bother with all the hassle.
I did a comparison one day - Ubuntu vs Windows XP. Ubuntu took 25 minutes, and all the drivers were there. Windows XP took over an hour, and then I had to hunt for drivers. And then I had to install Anti-Virus, Anti-Spyware, a real Firewall (I don't trust the Microsoft one), an Office Suite (Windows doesn't include one), a good Video Player (Windows Media player is useless - Videolan is far better), and a decent music player (WinAmp). Total install time was close to two hours, as compared to 25 minutes for Ubuntu.
If you like Windows - that's your problem. I read an article a while back that compared Windows users to abused spouses who keep coming back.
4
#14 Oct 7th, 2009
Somehow I don't think my Grandmother would understand why she has to "sudo" everything, and I don't think a hardcore gamer would accept the limitations WINE offers... Windows is only vulnerable to nasties BECAUSE it is the most popular O/S. If Ubuntu had a larger user base than Windows, do you not think that it would be a target for malicious engineers? As far as drivers go, I use a dual boot, XP (for gaming) and Ubunutu (for development): I still have not found satisfactory drivers for my GPU under ubuntu, in XP the card performs wonderfully. I have seen many MS bashing posts, and this one is possibly the least informative.
Last edited by majestic0110; Oct 7th, 2009 at 5:21 am.
If you have a quality, be proud of it and let it define you. Add it to the world!
If you got your answer, please mark the thread as Solved. It saves time when people are looking to contribute threads or for answers!
If you got your answer, please mark the thread as Solved. It saves time when people are looking to contribute threads or for answers!
1
#15 Oct 7th, 2009
•
•
•
•
As to your Linux lab - I note that you didn't compare the hardware. I saw one lab like you are talking about, where all of the Linux machines were old P3 units, and the Windows machines all Core 2 Duo. And yes, people were wondering why the Linux computers were slower!
OK, then you are an Anti-Microsoft troll... because of your actions, of course.
Check out my new band URL on facebook. I'm the bass player. :) Become a fan and leave comments if you like.
URL on facebook!
URL on facebook!
0
#16 Oct 7th, 2009
•
•
•
•
I tried two different distributions of *nix (Fedora 11 and Ubuntu) over a whole week and neither of them worked the way I wanted them to. I have a 64-bit computer with 5 gig ram and 750 gig hd, I could not get the sound to work right nor would it play movies on dvd drive.
If i am helpful, please give me reputation points.
0
#17 Oct 7th, 2009
•
•
•
•
I tried two different distributions of *nix (Fedora 11 and Ubuntu) over a whole week and neither of them worked the way I wanted them to. I have a 64-bit computer with 5 gig ram and 750 gig hd, I could not get the sound to work right nor would it play movies on dvd drive.
If i am helpful, please give me reputation points.
6
#18 Oct 7th, 2009
•
•
•
•
Well, real geeks don't run Windows. Real geeks don't run any Microsoft products, because we understand enough about operating systems and application programs, to know that Microsoft products are total, absolute, pieces of garbage.

Many of us 'geeks' are IT professionals, and banning Microsoft products would put us on the fast track to being out of work. Only hobbyists can afford to be extremist about these kind of things.
•
•
•
•
Even Microsoft admits that Windows was not designed to be secure.
Maybe Windows 7 will be their successful attempt to hit that mark. I have not tried it yet, but soon my PC will be upgraded at work and I will also move to Windows 7.
•
•
•
•
I could continue - but you should have gotten the idea by this point.
-Tommy (For Great Justice!) Gunn
•
•
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 64
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
•
•
•
•
Somehow I don't think my Grandmother would understand why she has to "sudo" everything, and I don't think a hardcore gamer would accept the limitations WINE offers... Windows is only vulnerable to nasties BECAUSE it is the most popular O/S. If Ubuntu had a larger user base than Windows, do you not think that it would be a target for malicious engineers? As far as drivers go, I use a dual boot, XP (for gaming) and Ubunutu (for development): I still have not found satisfactory drivers for my GPU under ubuntu, in XP the card performs wonderfully. I have seen many MS bashing posts, and this one is possibly the least informative.
Second, since the 'Nix platforms are built differently than Windows, viruses are virtually impossible to write for them. Popularity has nothing to do with Windows vulnerability, rather the problem has to do with defects in the Windows design philosophy, which can't be removed with out breaking backwards compatibility (of course considering how badly Vista messed up backwards compatibility they might as well have just gone for broke).
Third, if you can't find drivers for your GPU blame Microsoft, they use contractual limitations to prevent hardware makers from writing Linux drivers.
Glad you think it was uninformative - but that you still responded.
•
•
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 64
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
-3
#20 Oct 7th, 2009
•
•
•
•
How would you know what kind of computers are in the labs at my school? They are actually all the same but nice try.
If the Linux computers actually are slower, that's a good indication that there's something wrong, just like I would think that there was something wrong if I saw an XP install on a Core 2 Duo run slow.
•
•
•
•
OK, then you are an Anti-Microsoft troll... because of your actions, of course.
Seriously though - do you trust Microsoft? Do you trust Apple? You shouldn't. They are working towards their own best interests, which quite probably are not your best interests.
Of course you can trust me, I'm a paragon of virtue, and would never mislead you.
![]() |
•
•
•
•
| Tags |
| bankruptcy, garbage, linux, mad, odf, outlook, viruses, windows, windows>all, windows_wins |
Similar Threads
- how to run windows applications using unix command prompt? (*nix Software)
- Run Windows Sidebar Gadgets With UAC Disabled In Windows 7 (Windows Vista and Windows 7)
- Windows cannot find C:\Windows\config\csrss.exe (Windows NT / 2000 / XP)
- Windows cannot find C:\WINDOWS\system 32\rhhgmsb\winlogon.exe (IT Professionals' Lounge)
- will windows run on 640 of ram (Windows 95 / 98 / Me)
- News Story: Intel Macs can LEGALLY run Windows. (Upcoming News Stories)
- Getting an Older Program to Run on Windows XP (Windows tips 'n' tweaks)
Other Threads in the Geeks' Lounge Forum
- Previous Thread: What is that?
- Next Thread: How fast can you type?
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
.net 7 age amd apple avatar bluegene centos chips citrix cloudcomputing command computer console database debian dell desktop desktops development distributions dos economy energy enterprise fedora gadgets gnome google gpl hardware hp ibm ibm.news intelibm internet iphone itunes java laptop laptops leopard linustorvalds linux mac macosx medicine memory microsoft mobile netbooks news novell office open openoffice opensource opensuse openvz operating operatingsystem operatingsystems oracle os osx pc photonvps prompt ps3 recession redhat registry root russia security server servers slackware software sun supercomputer supercomputing system technology tiger trends tweaks ubuntu unix unmanaged upgrade virtualization vista vmware windows windows7 working x86 xen xp







