Best Windows IDE for C

Reply

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 681
Reputation: Tom Gunn has much to be proud of Tom Gunn has much to be proud of Tom Gunn has much to be proud of Tom Gunn has much to be proud of Tom Gunn has much to be proud of Tom Gunn has much to be proud of Tom Gunn has much to be proud of Tom Gunn has much to be proud of Tom Gunn has much to be proud of Tom Gunn has much to be proud of 
Solved Threads: 132
Tom Gunn's Avatar
Tom Gunn Tom Gunn is offline Offline
Practically a Master Poster
 
0
  #11
Oct 19th, 2009
Exactly. I want the best complier that is compatible with C89.
Then any of the popular compilers will meet that condition. You will not find a C89 compiler that is noticeably better than the rest.

Well if im "picky picky", then I invite you to go ahead and buy the complier for me and donate to me.
Please forgive me for the offensive remark. I will remember that your humor mechanism is in need of repair and avoid similar remarks in the future.
-Tommy (For Great Justice!) Gunn
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 82
Reputation: riahc3 is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 0
riahc3 riahc3 is offline Offline
Junior Poster in Training
 
0
  #12
Oct 19th, 2009
Originally Posted by Tom Gunn View Post
Then any of the popular compilers will meet that condition. You will not find a C89 compiler that is noticeably better than the rest.
Yet VS 2008's C compiler is different than a standard C compiler.

Originally Posted by Tom Gunn View Post
Please forgive me for the offensive remark. I will remember that your humor mechanism is in need of repair and avoid similar remarks in the future.
Please forgive me for hurting your feelings. I did not know you get so emotional over the truth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 681
Reputation: Tom Gunn has much to be proud of Tom Gunn has much to be proud of Tom Gunn has much to be proud of Tom Gunn has much to be proud of Tom Gunn has much to be proud of Tom Gunn has much to be proud of Tom Gunn has much to be proud of Tom Gunn has much to be proud of Tom Gunn has much to be proud of Tom Gunn has much to be proud of 
Solved Threads: 132
Tom Gunn's Avatar
Tom Gunn Tom Gunn is offline Offline
Practically a Master Poster
 
0
  #13
Oct 20th, 2009
Yet VS 2008's C compiler is different than a standard C compiler.
It conforms to C89, along with the C95 addendum. How is that not good enough? Like I said, all of the commonly used compilers are equally solid with C89. In my experience gcc is no better or worse in C89 mode than VC in C89 mode. Gcc is a great compiler, and I am not trying to convince you to use VC, but your statements really do suggest either ignorance or emotional attachment to gcc.
-Tommy (For Great Justice!) Gunn
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 118
Reputation: marco93 is infamous around these parts marco93 is infamous around these parts marco93 is infamous around these parts 
Solved Threads: 12
marco93 marco93 is offline Offline
Junior Poster
 
-1
  #14
Oct 20th, 2009
Originally Posted by riahc3 View Post
Hey
I cant use Visual Studio 2008 (which Id like to) as it uses it own compiler
And what's the problem with that ?!
It's by far the best compiler/debugger on the market.
All Big Companies have VS 2008 Enterprise licences and nothing else. It's just unbeatable nowadays..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 82
Reputation: riahc3 is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 0
riahc3 riahc3 is offline Offline
Junior Poster in Training
 
0
  #15
Oct 20th, 2009
I rather use the VS 2008 complier myself but AFAIK it is NOT standard (eg. it will comply exactly in another IDE/complier/etc).

I dont give a shit about gcc. Also, I rather use gcc, besides the standard, is because the rest of people are using gcc so if there is a problem, it will be a common problem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 681
Reputation: Tom Gunn has much to be proud of Tom Gunn has much to be proud of Tom Gunn has much to be proud of Tom Gunn has much to be proud of Tom Gunn has much to be proud of Tom Gunn has much to be proud of Tom Gunn has much to be proud of Tom Gunn has much to be proud of Tom Gunn has much to be proud of Tom Gunn has much to be proud of 
Solved Threads: 132
Tom Gunn's Avatar
Tom Gunn Tom Gunn is offline Offline
Practically a Master Poster
 
1
  #16
Oct 20th, 2009
It's by far the best compiler/debugger on the market.
Best is subjective. I do not think M$'s compiler is the best, but it is competitive with the other top compilers. The IDE and debugger are the biggest selling points for VS, in my opinion.

I rather use the VS 2008 complier myself but AFAIK it is NOT standard (eg. it will comply exactly in another IDE/complier/etc).
As I said before, VS 2008 is a C89/95 compliant compiler. You said you do not care about C99, so I do not understand why you keep insisting that VC is not standard. If you have specific complaints about VC that make it not standard in your opinion, I can address them. But until then, it is just going to be back and forth with no progress.
-Tommy (For Great Justice!) Gunn
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 15,358
Reputation: Ancient Dragon has a reputation beyond repute Ancient Dragon has a reputation beyond repute Ancient Dragon has a reputation beyond repute Ancient Dragon has a reputation beyond repute Ancient Dragon has a reputation beyond repute Ancient Dragon has a reputation beyond repute Ancient Dragon has a reputation beyond repute Ancient Dragon has a reputation beyond repute Ancient Dragon has a reputation beyond repute Ancient Dragon has a reputation beyond repute Ancient Dragon has a reputation beyond repute 
Solved Threads: 1463
Team Colleague
Featured Poster
Ancient Dragon's Avatar
Ancient Dragon Ancient Dragon is offline Offline
Still Learning
 
-7
  #17
Oct 20th, 2009
It was true a few years ago that VC++ 6.0 was not very standards-compliant compiler. I suspect they got so many complaints about it that M$ decided to make it fully c++ compliant.

The problem with Microsoft compilers is that they do not support POSIX standards. So a lot of code that is written with gcc can not be easily ported to VC++. If portability is important then Code::Blocks with MinGW is probably the better IDE/compiler.
Don't PM me with questions -- you might get a nasty PM in response. If you have a question then post it in one of the forums.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 6
Reputation: jeeter19 is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 0
jeeter19 jeeter19 is offline Offline
Newbie Poster
 
0
  #18
Oct 20th, 2009
I would suggest using NetBeans IDE. It has an easy to use editor interface and gives you syntax options much like you'd find in Visual Studio. I have found NetBeans to be a great compiler for my C work.

(Never use Eclipse for C, worst one I've found)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Reply

Message:



Similar Threads
Other Threads in the C Forum
Thread Tools Search this Thread



About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | DaniWeb | Acceptable Use Policy | RSS Feed

©2003 - 2009 DaniWeb® LLC