| | |
Waiting 15 seconds between reporting posts
![]() |
What is the reason behind making a user wait 15 seconds to report posts? I often hit that limit and skip reporting a bad post because I don't want to wait for 15 seconds to expire so I keep on reading threads....
I imagine if someone was abusing the reporting feature you could just penalize the user?
I imagine if someone was abusing the reporting feature you could just penalize the user?
0
#2 20 Days Ago
It could help stop it flooding with bot posts or something though.. Otherwise they could make loads.. It could overwhelm the admins
Make it idiot proof and someone will make a better idiot.
Check out my Site | and join us on IRC | Python Specific IRC
Check out my Site | and join us on IRC | Python Specific IRC
0
#3 20 Days Ago
Bots can also be programmed to avoid the delay resulting in the same problem. But us mere humans have to anxiously wait out delay
0
#4 20 Days Ago
Yeah.. im just saying a bot could be a lot more a nuisance if it was able to report 3 posts a second or something. That would clog up the system. So it gives the admins time to reel in the bot before it gets to annoying.
Make it idiot proof and someone will make a better idiot.
Check out my Site | and join us on IRC | Python Specific IRC
Check out my Site | and join us on IRC | Python Specific IRC
0
#5 19 Days Ago
More annoyingly, its like that for mods. I like to get like 10-20 spam threads all up in one go and delete them all, but i cant, because when you infract someone, it makes a thread, and sends a PM, incurring a wait. grrrrrrrrrr. have mentioned this to dani before.
If i am helpful, please give me reputation points.
0
#6 19 Days Ago
When you infract someone and when you report a post, both, it creates a new thread. There are server resources consumed when adding a thread to the database, and therefore flood protection is necessary or else it could potentially take down the database. Especially with something such as reporting posts, which isn't limited to mods-only ... there's no way of knowing for sure whether or not it's automated. Someone could set up a greasemonkey script, couldn't they? (Unless I'm thinking of something else???)
0
#8 19 Days Ago
Likewise as those people who constantly post those threads about DVD players they could just create a single account and post a new thread every time instead of using one account for multiple threads. To me it seems the only people restricted by the 15s limit is humans. Bots can get around it. Even then if it is a bot then ~5s is reasonable for a human but would stop a bot that was mass spamming if that is how the spam software was authored.
![]() |
Similar Threads
- Huge Load Delays (DaniWeb Community Feedback)
- If you could change one thing ... (DaniWeb Community Feedback)
- JSP pages not showing up (JSP)
- fastest compiler (C++)
- About who gave rep points (Geeks' Lounge)
Other Threads in the DaniWeb Community Feedback Forum
- Previous Thread: How do I find my threads?
- Next Thread: Code tags
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
+ abuse beginners bookmark bored box bug bugs calamity code codebox codesnippets codetags code_snippet comments cpuintensive daniweb design editcodesnippet end-of-the-world favouriteforums feedback ff3 flamewar glitch ie6 itsatag! kids layout login lulz negative newfeature poll post preview privatemessaging problem profanitytest profile quality quick rashakil-fol reply reputation reputation-power sandwich score search snippet socialgroups solvedthreads sub-forum suggestion tagcloud tagging tags theactualrulerofthetag-cloud:3 therulerofthetag-cloud:[ thread threadtagging today's-posts unansweredposts upgrade user voting whining







