| | |
Opinion on Software Theft
| View Poll Results: It´s wrong to shoplift but is software different? - what´s your opinion? | |||
| It´s OK to copy software, the company is rich. | | 1 | 4.35% |
| It´s not OK to copy software, but I´ve done in on occasion. | | 8 | 34.78% |
| It´s not OK to copy software - those that do should be prosecuted. | | 5 | 21.74% |
| All software should be free. | | 5 | 21.74% |
| Never copy software - if the company goes bankrupt, they can´t write more programs that we like. | | 4 | 17.39% |
| Voters: 23. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
•
•
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,826
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 144
•
•
•
•
Originally Posted by jwenting
Ever heard of marketing? Do you claim that the fact that the supermarket has a temporary discount on cans of soup means that cans of soup are overpriced?
It's exactly the same thing.
It's the person who privately purchases the software who pays through the nose, and needlessly so!
•
•
•
•
If Microsoft packs Word into Works (which is news to me, earlier versions were feature limited) they can charge less because of the higher sales volume of the product.
Where's that leave the poor dumb ******* who buys MS Word as a standalone product, not knowing any different?
•
•
•
•
Originally Posted by Catweazle
Word gets thrown in for free because MS can afford to throw it in. Doesn't cost them a thing to do so, and they're hoping people will use the eligibility they gain to purchase an Upgrade Edition of Office!
•
•
•
•
Originally Posted by Catweazle
Where's that leave the poor dumb ******* who buys MS Word as a standalone product, not knowing any different?
You can´t convince me that Microsoft means this to happen, although I don´t know why they don´t address the problem. I was with Microsoft in the early days when they came out with PC-DOS. (at this point half the readers are throwing tomatoes at me and the other half are cheering) The deal they made with IBM not only solidified their position in the market against their competitors but, unfortunately, proved to them that they could get away with some marginal programs and contracts.
When they came out with IE, they made a remarkably intuitive and brilliant business decision when they tied it in with Windows and forced their OEM customers to sell it with every system made. I´m not saying this was right! I AM saying it was a brilliant business decision because this one decision kept their position in the market almost invulnerable, even though they have suffered in the PR department.
MS power moguls like Steve B. have promulgated this rule of thumb in every facet of the company ever since. It might be because the individual sales of product don´t demand attention in the overall profit scheme that this part of the formula does not get the attention it deserves. I, for one, believe they should give the products away to individuals because that PR would be worth a lot more than the profit they realize on these sales.
"No one remembers who climbed Mount Everest the second time." — Na Nook.
Is it not possible to devise a mechanism to prevent software cracking?
Class Info:
Warrior Priest | Bright Wizard |Witch Hunter | Rune Priest |Engineer | Hammerer |Ironbreaker | Black Orc |Orc Choppa | Goblin Shaman |Squig Herder | Chosen |Magus | Zealot | Marauder
Warrior Priest | Bright Wizard |Witch Hunter | Rune Priest |Engineer | Hammerer |Ironbreaker | Black Orc |Orc Choppa | Goblin Shaman |Squig Herder | Chosen |Magus | Zealot | Marauder
•
•
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,826
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 144
Yes. We can discontinue using copyright protection measures, and that would prevent software cracking because cracks would no longer be needed. but it'd defeat the purpose of it all, don't you think?
•
•
•
•
Originally Posted by Toulinwoek
Please let the person speak for his/herself. I don't mind having my viewpoint attacked, but there was an ad hominem comment that was out of place. That's how flaming gets started, and I wanted it to be clear that I don't engage in such. Don't worry, I have/had no intention of responding in kind to that person again.
More information about me.
www.myspace.com/janine_therockchick
View My Blogs - search for janine's blog
www.myspace.com/janine_therockchick
View My Blogs - search for janine's blog
Back to the original topic...
I think software should be free. Like this, from the Spybot - Search and Destroy license:
http://www.safer-networking.org/en/license/
If Microsoft, Adobe, and several others thought more like that guy, the computer world would be a better place.
I think software should be free. Like this, from the Spybot - Search and Destroy license:
•
•
•
•
I.b. Binary
What do you get if you buy software? Lots of ones and zeros, nothing more. If they were distributed as art, I could understand paying it. But if the main goal of their order is to earn money - by fees or ads - I don't like it!
If Microsoft, Adobe, and several others thought more like that guy, the computer world would be a better place.
•
•
•
•
Originally Posted by mmiikkee
Back to the original topic...
I think software should be free. Like this, from the Spybot - Search and Destroy license:
http://www.safer-networking.org/en/license/
If Microsoft, Adobe, and several others thought more like that guy, the computer world would be a better place.
If it were free, there would be no incentives for the company to make it better, or even make it at all, it wouldnt work. That is just like saying, cars, food, and tv's or just anything else that you buy should be free, its ridiculous to say that.
My karma ran over your dogma.
yes, you can have mechanisms that prevent piracy.
You can have software that runs solely on a remote machine maintained by the selling company. Customers log into that machine with their password and username and are charged by the hour with a minimum fee per logged in user.
It's called ASP (application server provider) with subscription based services.
Imagine your computer having just a stub of an operating system and connecting to a central server at Microsoft headquarters when you turn it on.
It logs in and the meter starts ticking. If you have a good creditrating on your account (creditcard, prepaid, whatever) your machine starts to load Windows 2010.
You get your desktop (your profile is stored at your own machine or maybe at a server elsewhere where you rent some space).
You start Photoshop XCL. The loader contacts a server from Adobe who checks your credit rating. If it's good Photoshop loads (with only the plugins you have indicated you want a permanent subscription to) from the server.
Both Windows and Photoshop regularly contact their owners over a secure connection to see if you're still OK on your credits and warn you if you're running out of money.
Now, if you give your license codes to someone else he logs in using your account details and you get charged for their use as well as your own.
You can have software that runs solely on a remote machine maintained by the selling company. Customers log into that machine with their password and username and are charged by the hour with a minimum fee per logged in user.
It's called ASP (application server provider) with subscription based services.
Imagine your computer having just a stub of an operating system and connecting to a central server at Microsoft headquarters when you turn it on.
It logs in and the meter starts ticking. If you have a good creditrating on your account (creditcard, prepaid, whatever) your machine starts to load Windows 2010.
You get your desktop (your profile is stored at your own machine or maybe at a server elsewhere where you rent some space).
You start Photoshop XCL. The loader contacts a server from Adobe who checks your credit rating. If it's good Photoshop loads (with only the plugins you have indicated you want a permanent subscription to) from the server.
Both Windows and Photoshop regularly contact their owners over a secure connection to see if you're still OK on your credits and warn you if you're running out of money.
Now, if you give your license codes to someone else he logs in using your account details and you get charged for their use as well as your own.
As people are clearly allowed to attack me but I'm not allowed to defend myself, I no longer post to this site.
•
•
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,826
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 144
And if that day ever comes, jwenting, I'm happy to say that I have systems here which will happily chug along meeting my needs with Windows 2005 until the end of my days!
The scenario you describe will probably eventuate sooner or later, but I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for it.
The scenario you describe will probably eventuate sooner or later, but I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for it.
![]() |
Other Threads in the IT Professionals' Lounge Forum
- Previous Thread: Will Google's latest Labs Release help their ALGOs
- Next Thread: Linux vs. Microsoft Windows
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
1gbit advertising advice amazon answers archive british broadband business businessprocesses career carrier censorship cern china cio collectiveintelligence connectivity consumer consumers corporateearnings datatransfer debtcollectors dictionary digg digital ebay ecommerce email employment environment facebook food government grid high-definition hottub infodelivery infotech intel internet interview ipod isp japan kindle lhc library malware marketing mit moonfruit news onlineshopping piracy piratebay pope porn program questions r&d religion remoteworking research retail security sex shopping simple skype smallbusiness smb sms socialmedia socialnetworking software softwareengineer spam speed spending startrek statistics stocks study stumbleupon survey tabletpc technology touch-screen touchscreen twitter uk videoinprint voips web webdeveloper windows words





