RSS Forums RSS
Please support our Apple Hardware advertiser: Programming Forums
Views: 2908 | Replies: 14
Reply
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 778
Reputation: Zachery has a spectacular aura about Zachery has a spectacular aura about 
Rep Power: 8
Solved Threads: 20
Colleague
Zachery's Avatar
Zachery Zachery is offline Offline
The Geek Father

Re: Sad news for mac people

  #11  
Jun 16th, 2005
Originally Posted by kc0arf
Hi,

On a second round here, I also wonder about chips in quantity. Seems like when you want to order a Mac or an iPod, you have to wait for it. That is bad business. When I am ready for a new computer, and have the funds set, I want it in a week.

Christian
Week? I want the parts in my hands next day!

Mostly its shipping from china that hurts them.
Firefox: no, its not the end all solution, it has its own issues and in time it will be just as insecure as IE, when its hit Firefox 6, if it makes it that far. Oh, and AOL pays for it, incase you didn't know.

Microsoft & Windows: If you hate it so much, move to linux, or bsd, or anything else, stop complaning and move on.
Good starting places: Gentoo Novell SUSE Fedora Core Apple
Reply With Quote  
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6
Reputation: Kolin is an unknown quantity at this point 
Rep Power: 0
Solved Threads: 0
Kolin Kolin is offline Offline
Newbie Poster

Re: Sad news for mac people

  #12  
Jun 17th, 2005
I thought the whole reason MAC had an edge in media and rendering was because they use a RIS cpu type & Intel doesn't. ???
Reply With Quote  
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,514
Reputation: kc0arf is a jewel in the rough kc0arf is a jewel in the rough kc0arf is a jewel in the rough 
Rep Power: 10
Solved Threads: 49
Colleague
kc0arf kc0arf is offline Offline
Posting Virtuoso

Re: Sad news for mac people

  #13  
Jun 17th, 2005
Hello,

Apple does use RISC processors, and that helps in the instruction of code, whereas Intel uses more of a CISC design. RISC = Reduced Instruction, CISC = Complex instruction.

They are referring to the micro-code that the CPU uses to do things. A RISC chip has more instructions that are easier to execute than a CISC chip.

I have been out of the hardware examination thing for a while now, and am not sure if Intel has made more pipelines and caching, but am sure they have been moving right along now to keep performance moving.

Christian
Reply With Quote  
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 555
Reputation: yellow is an unknown quantity at this point 
Rep Power: 6
Solved Threads: 5
yellow's Avatar
yellow yellow is offline Offline
Posting Pro

Re: Sad news for mac people

  #14  
Jun 17th, 2005
I believe the new chips that Intel will release soon (which Apple will likely end up using) are modeled more after RISC chips and have reduced pipelines. No more Netburst.. I think..
Reply With Quote  
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,735
Reputation: Catweazle is a jewel in the rough Catweazle is a jewel in the rough Catweazle is a jewel in the rough Catweazle is a jewel in the rough 
Rep Power: 15
Solved Threads: 140
Colleague
Catweazle Catweazle is offline Offline
Grandad

Re: Sad news for mac people

  #15  
Jun 17th, 2005
At one stage, long ago, Macs definitely used to be 'better' at graphics etc than the PC. But now the relative advantages have disappeared. Doesn't matter if one chip is RISC and another CISC if they both produce the same performance, does it.

Macs are more favoured by many professional users still, but more for the implementation of software than for any peformance advantage. As one discussion I read states
this used to be true. The professional graphics world mostly uses Macs, because the top graphics apps (Photoshop, QuarkXPress, Freehand) are a little better implemented in their Mac versions than their PC versions, and because most graphics shops have a significant investment in Mac software and peripherals which they're not going to give up.

Truly high end work is more likely to be performed on fair dinkum workstations rather than on either Macs or PCs!

Mac OS is now based upon the Unix derivative FreeBSD, which already runs on x86 systems, so the transition won't really be any 'biggie'.
Reply With Quote  
Reply

Only community members can participate in forum threads. You must register or log in to contribute.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

 

Thread Tools Display Modes
Forums | Blogs | Tutorials | Code Snippets | Whitepapers | RSS Feeds | Advertising
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:09 pm.
Newsletter Archive - Sitemap - Privacy Statement - Acceptable Use Policy - Contact Us
Forum system based on vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2003 - 2008 DaniWeb® LLC