| | |
Overlocking - I Disagree
![]() |
•
•
•
•
Originally Posted by Masta_Cracka
Just wait until you experience SNDS, then you'll think twice. However, if you've got money to burn then what the hell? Even if everything goes "properly" you can never assure a stable system.
You're right, if your overclocking a 3.0 GHz chip then what's the point? Unless, of course, it's for bragging rights.
Spend some time at an overclockers forum, it can be very tempting, especially when you hear the success stories. All in all, it looks like great fun, but most of us just can't take those kinds of risks.
~Masta
Of course there's always a risk involved, but that doesn't mean good clean overclocks without issue cannot be obtained.
OC'ing a recently released 3GHz chip to 3.6 means nothing. Taking a 2.4 to 3.6 is an accomplishment. 3.0 to 3.6 is a 20% increase in raw speed. 2.4 to 3.6 is a 50% increase in raw speed. Huge difference.
I just advocate overclocking, I don't push it on people. If they want to know more about it, I'll forward them on. But if I don't know, I'll try my damnedest to get them to the right place.
Last edited by feigned; Jan 13th, 2004 at 9:49 pm.
Champagne ambition on a beer budget.
I agree with you 100% oh yeah forget to tell you Tek is the owner of that site there used to I think still is a ton of pictures I believe 800MB of pictures I am right Tek? I gave him the owner ship of the site when I couldn't maintain 800MB of pictures & thumbnails. Also most of them are cool computer pictures places I worked etc ever see a ISP Backbone haha that all the way to this topic of overclocking. Anywho I agree with you 100% but to me overclocking as of "now" as of today, as of todays technology to me, and I am not speaking for the world, is completely pointless.
Thats My Two Cents
Thats My Two Cents
Jimmy
E-Mail - jimmy@fiberops.net
Chief Information Officer (CIO) of FiberOps
E-Mail - jimmy@fiberops.net
Chief Information Officer (CIO) of FiberOps
•
•
•
•
SNDS? System Near Death Syndrome?
Ummm, no. Sudden Northwood Death Syndrome, for Pentium chips anyway. I have no experience with AMD chips.
•
•
•
•
Of course there's always a risk involved, but that doesn't mean good clean overclocks without issue cannot be obtained.
I never said they couldn't, like I said, for the average Joe with little expendable income this practice is not advised.
•
•
•
•
Taking a 2.4 to 3.6 is an accomplishment.
I agree. I should make it clear that I am not against overclocking in any shape or form, I am just sending a message to anyone who isn't aware that there are substantial risks involved, e.g. loss of money and possible hardware failure even beyond the chip itself; not to mention the bruised ego for those who will inevitably muck it up.
~Masta
•
•
•
•
Originally Posted by feigned
Right. For all that wish to get involved, all they need to do is perform a little bit of research and get some knowledge in their brains, be sensible about things, and they'll be fine.
~Masta
![]() |
Other Threads in the Motherboards, CPUs and RAM Forum
- Previous Thread: PC3200 SDRAM question
- Next Thread: Amd 64 3200+??
Views: 5177 | Replies: 17
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Tag cloud for Motherboards, CPUs and RAM





