Out with the old... or back to the old? HELP

Reply

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 55
Reputation: redsabre is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 0
redsabre's Avatar
redsabre redsabre is offline Offline
Junior Poster in Training

Re: Out with the old... or back to the old? HELP

 
0
  #11
Jul 5th, 2005
Originally Posted by Zachery
You moved from a Real PRocessor, to a budget processor, which is part of your problem.

You went from a P4 1.7 ghz processor with more cache, to an AMD Semperon Class (equivlant of a celeron in AMD's case) with less cache.

You would have been alot better off with a AMD XP or AMD 64, or even a P4 2.8
Yes, but what about what Cocnut Monkey said?

A lower frequency it seems, but in case you didn't know, gigahertz isn't the main indicator of performance in CPUs anymore - it's the design of the core and how much work it can do per clock cycle.

That Sempron 2800+ there is based on the Athlon 64 - quite simply the fastest gaming CPU on the market. They've stripped the 64-bittiness and chopped some of the internal cache off, but it's still a capable CPU and easily surpasses your doddering 1.7Ghz P4.
The reality is I have already purchased this. My older mobo is not upwardly scalable and it wouldn't take more than a 2.4GHz, not much of an increase.

I will one day move up to the Athlon 64 as my budget allows. Until then I just want to get to playing BF2 (really the only game I'm playing).

So, that being said - do you know if a PCI express card will work in a standard PCI slot?

Thanks for helping a newbie out, I appreciate and respect all the opinions and information I'm getting here!

rs
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 960
Reputation: belama is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 2
belama's Avatar
belama belama is offline Offline
Posting Shark

Re: Out with the old... or back to the old? HELP

 
0
  #12
Jul 5th, 2005
No, a PCI Express card will not fit in a PCI slot. They are both totally different. You would need another motherboard to get PCI-e.

You should just buy an AGP card for now and like you said, go to AMD 64 later and PCI-e at the same time. The 6600GT is better than X700 Pro and there is no AGP X700 anyway (dont think so).

EDIT: And BTW it would have been only about 10$ more for a athlon XP 2800+ instead (it has double the cache and it is 2.1 ghz. not same socket though)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 781
Reputation: Zachery has a spectacular aura about Zachery has a spectacular aura about 
Solved Threads: 21
Team Colleague
Zachery's Avatar
Zachery Zachery is offline Offline
The Geek Father

Re: Out with the old... or back to the old? HELP

 
0
  #13
Jul 5th, 2005
Yes, I am aware of all that fun jazz about processor speeds, but not only did you not gain a whole lot of speed, you didn't gain much raw power.

A AMD XP 2500+ would probally out preform you 2800+ semperon, regardless of clock speed, the 2500+ has a better cache, which means it works harder.
Firefox: no, its not the end all solution, it has its own issues and in time it will be just as insecure as IE, when its hit Firefox 6, if it makes it that far. Oh, and AOL pays for it, incase you didn't know.

Microsoft & Windows: If you hate it so much, move to linux, or bsd, or anything else, stop complaning and move on.
Good starting places: Gentoo Novell SUSE Fedora Core Apple
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 55
Reputation: redsabre is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 0
redsabre's Avatar
redsabre redsabre is offline Offline
Junior Poster in Training

Re: Out with the old... or back to the old? HELP

 
0
  #14
Jul 5th, 2005
Cool, so now I am switching focus... I'm gonna bite the bullet (use plastic) and get the Athlon64 3200+ and the 6600GT. You only live once, right? Thanks for all the input.

rs
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 781
Reputation: Zachery has a spectacular aura about Zachery has a spectacular aura about 
Solved Threads: 21
Team Colleague
Zachery's Avatar
Zachery Zachery is offline Offline
The Geek Father

Re: Out with the old... or back to the old? HELP

 
0
  #15
Jul 5th, 2005
Do make sure you have the motherboard to support the AMD 64 processor before you run off and buy one!
Firefox: no, its not the end all solution, it has its own issues and in time it will be just as insecure as IE, when its hit Firefox 6, if it makes it that far. Oh, and AOL pays for it, incase you didn't know.

Microsoft & Windows: If you hate it so much, move to linux, or bsd, or anything else, stop complaning and move on.
Good starting places: Gentoo Novell SUSE Fedora Core Apple
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 55
Reputation: redsabre is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 0
redsabre's Avatar
redsabre redsabre is offline Offline
Junior Poster in Training

Re: Out with the old... or back to the old? HELP

 
0
  #16
Jul 5th, 2005
Yeah, I just checked it out... thanks

AMD Athlon 64 3200+(CG,SledgeHammer,130nm,L2-512KB) 1600
- OK!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 570
Reputation: Coconut Monkey is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 12
Team Colleague
Coconut Monkey's Avatar
Coconut Monkey Coconut Monkey is offline Offline
Inside your PC

Re: Out with the old... or back to the old? HELP

 
0
  #17
Jul 6th, 2005
Originally Posted by Zachery
You moved from a Real PRocessor, to a budget processor, which is part of your problem.

You went from a P4 1.7 ghz processor with more cache, to an AMD Semperon Class (equivlant of a celeron in AMD's case) with less cache.
I disagree Zachery - the Sempron is question may have less cache than other chips out there, but it does have the A64 core up its sleeve, giving it quite a bit of grunt, especially when compared to the rather ancient 1.7Ghz P4 from before (which, incidently, only has 256Kb of L2 cache ).

As we can see here, a Sempron 2600 does a pretty good job in gaming (and overclocks like the clappers).

In the end however, it's the video card that you should really focus on! I would suggest reallocating money from the CPU replacement to something like a 6800GT.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,826
Reputation: Catweazle is a jewel in the rough Catweazle is a jewel in the rough Catweazle is a jewel in the rough Catweazle is a jewel in the rough 
Solved Threads: 144
Team Colleague
Catweazle Catweazle is offline Offline
Grandad

Re: Out with the old... or back to the old? HELP

 
0
  #18
Jul 6th, 2005
I disagree also. The initial Sempron releases were based on the Athlon XP core but had less cache. The current Sempron range, which replaces the earlier version, is based on the Athlon64 core and is considerably better.

Video card is the primary area of concern for 3D performance here, and as stated earlier I consider a 6600GT to be a minimum acceptable level of performance in today's world!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 55
Reputation: redsabre is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 0
redsabre's Avatar
redsabre redsabre is offline Offline
Junior Poster in Training

Re: Out with the old... or back to the old? HELP

 
0
  #19
Jul 6th, 2005
UPDATE:

Until I decide what to do I have re-installed my old Asus P4T/P4 1.7GHz/1gb Rambus with my newer ATi 9250 256MB P.O.C. Miracle of Miracles... I can play BF2 without it freezing up choppy at intense moments and not the smoothest of graphics, but I can live with it for now. I'm gonna save up (plastic's too close to max for comfort) for the 6600GT or better and then go with more processor down the road as the prices begin to drop.

Thanks again for all of the great info guys... good stuff.

rs
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Reply

This thread is more than three months old.
Perhaps start a new thread instead?
Message:



Similar Threads
Other Threads in the Motherboards, CPUs and RAM Forum
Thread Tools Search this Thread



About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | DaniWeb | Acceptable Use Policy | RSS Feed

©2003 - 2009 DaniWeb® LLC