| | |
KDE vs Gnome What is main diference?
![]() |
Both have their advantages. KDE is the best for people who love eye-candy, because it has features like window transparency, shadows, animated things, etc. But because of all these extra features, it is very bloated, and is quite slow. Gnome, on the other hand, is more lightweight. It still has quite a lot of eye candy, but I find it quicker, easier and simpler.
Of course, the best way for you to find out is to try them yourself, and find your favourite.
Of course, the best way for you to find out is to try them yourself, and find your favourite.
KDE
+Looks pretty.
+Highly customizable.
+Most Linux programs written for the X display are designed for KDE.
+/-Lots of eye-candy and useless utilities.
-SLLLOOOOOWWWW (unless you have a mighty kick-**** computer).
-If you're running 6 or more programs throughout the multiple desktops, it can slow down to the speed of a McDonald's drivethrough on 4:20.
GNOME
+It's fast (doesn't matter if your computer is high-end or not).
+On a Pentium II 450MHz, I've only noticed it slow down if I was running 20 or more programs scattered about 4 virtual desktops. :cheesy:
+Has better looking visual themes (they're alot cleaner in appearance).
-....I can't really think of any downsides....
FINAL CONSENSUS
For functionality, stability and perfect for everyday use, go with GNOME.
For the Windows convert who loves their pretty looking window managers, KDE.
For functionality, stability, perfection for everyday use, and pretty cool look, go with FluxBox (or BlackBox if you wanna kick it old school). :mrgreen:
+Looks pretty.
+Highly customizable.
+Most Linux programs written for the X display are designed for KDE.
+/-Lots of eye-candy and useless utilities.
-SLLLOOOOOWWWW (unless you have a mighty kick-**** computer).
-If you're running 6 or more programs throughout the multiple desktops, it can slow down to the speed of a McDonald's drivethrough on 4:20.
GNOME
+It's fast (doesn't matter if your computer is high-end or not).
+On a Pentium II 450MHz, I've only noticed it slow down if I was running 20 or more programs scattered about 4 virtual desktops. :cheesy:
+Has better looking visual themes (they're alot cleaner in appearance).
-....I can't really think of any downsides....
FINAL CONSENSUS
For functionality, stability and perfect for everyday use, go with GNOME.
For the Windows convert who loves their pretty looking window managers, KDE.
For functionality, stability, perfection for everyday use, and pretty cool look, go with FluxBox (or BlackBox if you wanna kick it old school). :mrgreen:
![]() |
Similar Threads
- KDE or GNOME (Window and Desktop Managers)
- KDE and Gnome = Bloatware (Window and Desktop Managers)
Other Threads in the Window and Desktop Managers Forum
- Previous Thread: what is the root
- Next Thread: beryle
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
age android apple avast busybox canonical cell computer cool dell design desktop desktops developers distributions facebook fedora free fsf gadgets gfvs gio gnome gnu google gui hardware incomprehensible interface ireland itunes jasonperlow karmic kde kernel2.6.25 kids koala laptop laptops linustorvalds linux livecds lxde mac madness mandriva mepis microsoft napster netbooks news opensuse operating-system operatingsystems os oswars pc pclinuxos phones program programmers programming qt shuttleworth software steveballmer super survey twitter ubuntu user verizon vfs virtualization webbased windowmanagers windows xfce xui xwnidow youtube






:cheesy: 