| | |
What's your opinion on how to "properly" set up drives?
![]() |
I recently had a brief back and forth with nizzy1115 about IDE channel sharing and how to set up drives on the channels for maximum performance. Since there isn't a "right answer", I was curious what everyone's take was.
My opinion is that harddrives are used more often than optical drives, so it's better to have optical drives sharing a channel with harddrives than it is for harddrives to share channels. My system usage is harddrive intensive though, so I am biased. I have three internal harddrives and two external, and I always have slowdowns when I am making transfers between the two drives that share a channel.
What do you guys think?
My opinion is that harddrives are used more often than optical drives, so it's better to have optical drives sharing a channel with harddrives than it is for harddrives to share channels. My system usage is harddrive intensive though, so I am biased. I have three internal harddrives and two external, and I always have slowdowns when I am making transfers between the two drives that share a channel.
What do you guys think?
Did we help you? Did we miss the point entirely? Update your thread and let us know.
Don't like the answers you are getting?
Did you try searching?
Clean up and optimize Windows 2000/XP
Don't like the answers you are getting?
Did you try searching?
Clean up and optimize Windows 2000/XP
I just remembered this topic, and came back for a look. No replies! Shockers. Time to rectify.....
I'm of the belief that drives should only share channels with devices of the same type. Optical drives on one channel, hard drives on the other. Now, I'm buggered if I can remember any benchmarks or official tests that prove what's best, and I'm buggered if I can be bothered looking anything up at this hour of the night.
That said, my "belief" stems from the (possibly horribly incorrect) knowledge that:
I'm of the belief that drives should only share channels with devices of the same type. Optical drives on one channel, hard drives on the other. Now, I'm buggered if I can remember any benchmarks or official tests that prove what's best, and I'm buggered if I can be bothered looking anything up at this hour of the night.
That said, my "belief" stems from the (possibly horribly incorrect) knowledge that:
- Optical drives utilise a different transfer protocol from hard drives, so any sharing between the two could potentially slow things down with two different protocols in action.
- Two hard drives on one ATA100/133 channel have plenty of bandwidth to bandy around with - transfer rates rarely hit more than 30-40Mb/s.
![]() |
Similar Threads
- High level of Seagate 2.5" SATA drives failing (Apple Hardware)
- Who knows about different Hard Drives? (Storage)
- "Set as Startpage" for Firefox. (HTML and CSS)
- CPU spikes, trouble with audio, hijacklog (Viruses, Spyware and other Nasties)
- Final yr project an opinion needed on "dynamic web pg creator" (Computer Science)
- Need help Using "get and set methods" (Java)
Other Threads in the Storage Forum
- Previous Thread: Whirring Sound?
- Next Thread: Noises, "Primary Drive 1 Not Found"
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
acronis archivevault atmail backup backupandrecoverystrategy blinkingcursor boot clone data databasededuplication datadeduplicationsoftware datarecovery datastorage deduping deduplicating deduplication deduplicationalgorithm deduplicationsoftware deduplicationsystems deduplicationtechnology disasterrecovery disasterrecoverydatabase disc-drive discdrives drive emailappliance emailarchive emailstorage failure filters gmail hard harddrive hitachi mail maxtor news nobelprize norton offsitestorage partition power recovery restoreserverdatabase serverdatarecovery serverdisasterrecovery serverrecoverysoftware storage terabyte undelete upper windowsserverrestore





