Please support our Search Engine Optimization advertiser: Get a Free SEO Analysis!
Reply

Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 12,040
Reputation: cscgal is a glorious beacon of light cscgal is a glorious beacon of light cscgal is a glorious beacon of light cscgal is a glorious beacon of light cscgal is a glorious beacon of light cscgal is a glorious beacon of light 
Solved Threads: 125
Administrator
Staff Writer
cscgal's Avatar
cscgal cscgal is online now Online
The Queen of DaniWeb

Rel=Nofollow

 
0
  #1
Nov 25th, 2005
Do you recommend using the rel=nofollow tag on links that are member-submitted, such as from a blog or forum?
Dani the Computer Science Gal
Follow my Twitter feed! twitter.com/daniweb
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 252
Reputation: jewboy is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 1
jewboy jewboy is offline Offline
Posting Whiz in Training

Re: Rel=Nofollow

 
0
  #2
Nov 27th, 2005
My opinion is no. Crap links should be weeded out by human editors / moderators.
www.markdavidny.com - just one of my sites I'm trying to boost traffic for ;-)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 12,040
Reputation: cscgal is a glorious beacon of light cscgal is a glorious beacon of light cscgal is a glorious beacon of light cscgal is a glorious beacon of light cscgal is a glorious beacon of light cscgal is a glorious beacon of light 
Solved Threads: 125
Administrator
Staff Writer
cscgal's Avatar
cscgal cscgal is online now Online
The Queen of DaniWeb

Re: Rel=Nofollow

 
0
  #3
Nov 27th, 2005
But human editors are ... well ... human. Sometimes we don't catch everything or we don't catch it fast enough. And what if a spam member links to a bad neighborhood or lots of off-topic links? What if they do this in their signature and the link is suddenly and diabolically spread throughout your otherwise squeaky clean site? Especially on very large forums, once a thread falls off of page 1, it most likely isn't going to be respidered more than once (or twice if you're lucky).
Dani the Computer Science Gal
Follow my Twitter feed! twitter.com/daniweb
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 72
Reputation: fromthe5 is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 0
fromthe5 fromthe5 is offline Offline
Junior Poster in Training

Re: Rel=Nofollow

 
0
  #4
Nov 30th, 2005
There's quite a debate about this currently going on. I'm aware of one SEO forum that did it and they quickly lost most of their heavy hitters. I don't think they left because they didn't want to lose the links. I think it was more that they didn't agree with the concept. I do think however that if you don't have the personel to monitor the posts that it's difficult to stop the spammers. So it's your call I guess. One way to do it is to raise the number of post that a member must make before use the sig link. Then if they post junk just to get there you can weed em out before they reach the number. In most of the forums that I frequent, any spam draws attention like flies to a horse barn, and the posters either straighten up or are history. Most forum software gives you the option to not only ban, but to delete all or some of the posts from a particular user.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 72
Reputation: fromthe5 is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 0
fromthe5 fromthe5 is offline Offline
Junior Poster in Training

Re: Rel=Nofollow

 
0
  #5
Nov 30th, 2005
Speaking of spelling: make that "personnel" not "personel". It's getting late. lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 60
Reputation: seo_expert is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 0
seo_expert's Avatar
seo_expert seo_expert is offline Offline
Junior Poster in Training

Re: Rel=Nofollow

 
0
  #6
Dec 23rd, 2005
except for the Signature links rest should be done with rel=nofollow
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 193
Reputation: Scribbller is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 2
Scribbller Scribbller is offline Offline
Insane Scribblling

Re: Rel=Nofollow

 
0
  #7
Jan 12th, 2006
In my opinion SEs dont even give much weight to links inside posts/signatures any more let alone ban a website because of them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 12,040
Reputation: cscgal is a glorious beacon of light cscgal is a glorious beacon of light cscgal is a glorious beacon of light cscgal is a glorious beacon of light cscgal is a glorious beacon of light cscgal is a glorious beacon of light 
Solved Threads: 125
Administrator
Staff Writer
cscgal's Avatar
cscgal cscgal is online now Online
The Queen of DaniWeb

Re: Rel=Nofollow

 
0
  #8
Jan 12th, 2006
Not true Get a link within a front page article on a high profile site and then try and say that links within articles don't do much On the contrary, it's these types of links that Google was designed to thrive on ... not little text links in sidebars and footers that are just there because people bought them.
Dani the Computer Science Gal
Follow my Twitter feed! twitter.com/daniweb
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 60
Reputation: seo_expert is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 0
seo_expert's Avatar
seo_expert seo_expert is offline Offline
Junior Poster in Training

Re: Rel=Nofollow

 
0
  #9
Jan 12th, 2006
Links from the Forums do count and are worth the efforts to be a member.

Google started to discount bought links or text ads which people buy for their websites.

It now prefers natural links..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 12,040
Reputation: cscgal is a glorious beacon of light cscgal is a glorious beacon of light cscgal is a glorious beacon of light cscgal is a glorious beacon of light cscgal is a glorious beacon of light cscgal is a glorious beacon of light 
Solved Threads: 125
Administrator
Staff Writer
cscgal's Avatar
cscgal cscgal is online now Online
The Queen of DaniWeb

Re: Rel=Nofollow

 
0
  #10
Jan 12th, 2006
Google has always preferred and emphasized natural links. Link buying is just a practice to get around google's algorithm. Google has always taken efforts to counteract it.
Dani the Computer Science Gal
Follow my Twitter feed! twitter.com/daniweb
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Reply

This thread is more than three months old.
Perhaps start a new thread instead?
Message:



Similar Threads
Other Threads in the Search Engine Optimization Forum
Thread Tools Search this Thread



About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | DaniWeb | Acceptable Use Policy | RSS Feed

©2003 - 2009 DaniWeb® LLC