| | |
Content management system
Please support our PHP advertiser: PostgreSQL or MySQL? Compare and contrast the two most popular open source databases
![]() |
•
•
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 138
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 2
It depends. If you're making it for yourself and you can freely choose the platform, asp.net is a lot more powerful coming with a great framework. However php is a lot more popular among small businesses and thus among most host service providers.
If you're planning development of a product, again it depends on what is your audience. Small businesses tend to prefer php, while big corporations most definitely choose asp.net or j2ee.
If you're planning development of a product, again it depends on what is your audience. Small businesses tend to prefer php, while big corporations most definitely choose asp.net or j2ee.
•
•
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 126
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 2
target the small auidenice than bigger once, use PHP and it would be better for you in learning too as it is easier to learn.
Couple other things to make a note of.
Windows hosting accounts/servers cost slightly more then Linux ones. Therefore, building in ASP wouldn't really work, unless they had some funky mono .NET aspx apache module loaded. Doubtfull.
So to save costs, using a Linux host, and building in PHP would be easier.
Your also likely to find more information if you get stuck wanting to know how to do something. The way I see things is that PHP is more looked at, simply because of the cost implications; there are none!
ASPX or .NET is more charged for, simply because of the way its hosted and what tools you use to build with.
My advice, PHP.. Its sexual
Windows hosting accounts/servers cost slightly more then Linux ones. Therefore, building in ASP wouldn't really work, unless they had some funky mono .NET aspx apache module loaded. Doubtfull.
So to save costs, using a Linux host, and building in PHP would be easier.
Your also likely to find more information if you get stuck wanting to know how to do something. The way I see things is that PHP is more looked at, simply because of the cost implications; there are none!
ASPX or .NET is more charged for, simply because of the way its hosted and what tools you use to build with.
My advice, PHP.. Its sexual
•
•
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 138
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 2
0
#5 Jan 4th, 2007
I wouldn't say that PHP is easier to learn as opposed to ASP.NET. What it's easier to, though, is catching up bad coding practices. So when starting to learn PHP, don't even try to look for online tutorials. Get yourself a good book and read it. Once you're proficient enough, check out those tutorials to see the common mistakes that are done. That may sound rather harsh, but most often it's true.
![]() |
Similar Threads
- Which content management system (CMS) should I choose? (Existing Scripts)
- se friendly Database content management (Existing Scripts)
- Content management system (Site Layout and Usability)
- Bluo Content Management System (Websites for Sale)
- Content Management System (PHP)
- Content Management Systems ? (IT Professionals' Lounge)
Other Threads in the PHP Forum
- Previous Thread: Form Processor
- Next Thread: Access your Outlook application using PHP?
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
# 5.2.10 alexa apache api array beginner binary broken cakephp checkbox class clean clients cms code cron curl database date directory display dissertation dynamic echo echo$_get[x]changingitintovariable... email encode error fairness file files folder form forms function functions google href htaccess html image images include indentedsubcategory insert ip javascript joomla legislation limit link local login mail memberships menu mlm multiple multipletables mysql mysqlquery newsletters oop open paypal pdf persist php problem provider query radio random recursion remote rss script search server sessions simple sms sockets source space spam sql syntax system table tutorial update upload url validator variable video web youtube





