please tell me, why we named java as Java 2

Please support our Java advertiser: Programming Forums - DaniWeb Sister Site
Reply

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 4
Reputation: khoomy is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 0
khoomy khoomy is offline Offline
Newbie Poster

please tell me, why we named java as Java 2

 
0
  #1
Sep 17th, 2004
why we named java as Java 2?
please tell me
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 609
Reputation: freesoft_2000 is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 8
freesoft_2000 freesoft_2000 is offline Offline
Practically a Master Poster

Re: please tell me, why we named java as Java 2

 
0
  #2
Sep 19th, 2004
hi everyone,

Java refers to the first package that was created ie awt only
Java 2 is the swing package and awt package together

Yours Sincerely

Richard West
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 350
Reputation: Ghost is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 2
Ghost's Avatar
Ghost Ghost is offline Offline
Posting Whiz

Re: please tell me, why we named java as Java 2

 
0
  #3
Sep 20th, 2004
that basically sums it up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 5
Reputation: karthikkannan is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 0
karthikkannan karthikkannan is offline Offline
Newbie Poster

Re: please tell me, why we named java as Java 2

 
0
  #4
Jan 17th, 2007
Originally Posted by khoomy View Post
why we named java as Java 2?
please tell me
Hai,

The '2' in Java refers the 2nd Generation. have a look at this link
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/...rsion-5.0.html

Have a nice day

Regards,
Karthikkannan
http://vaaghai.blogspot.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 353
Reputation: aniseed is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 6
aniseed's Avatar
aniseed aniseed is offline Offline
Posting Whiz

Re: please tell me, why we named java as Java 2

 
0
  #5
Jan 17th, 2007
Originally Posted by karthikkannan View Post
Hai,

The '2' in Java refers the 2nd Generation. have a look at this link
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/...rsion-5.0.html

Have a nice day

Regards,
Karthikkannan
http://vaaghai.blogspot.com
That post is over 2.5 years old when Java 5 wasn't even around.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 5
Reputation: karthikkannan is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 0
karthikkannan karthikkannan is offline Offline
Newbie Poster

Re: please tell me, why we named java as Java 2

 
0
  #6
Jan 17th, 2007
yup buddy...
Anyway the answer posted in this thread was obviously wrong... If some one sees that alone, they might take the wrong answer... Thats why i had to reply for that
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 89
Reputation: TylerSBreton is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 3
TylerSBreton's Avatar
TylerSBreton TylerSBreton is offline Offline
Junior Poster in Training

Re: please tell me, why we named java as Java 2

 
0
  #7
Jan 17th, 2007
Just a side note...this post is so long that Java has already changed to just Java SE 6, not Java 2 SE anymore.

Basically, leave it alone....it's done.

Regards,

Tyler S. Breton
Last edited by TylerSBreton; Jan 17th, 2007 at 11:08 pm.
Western New England College '08
Computer Science

Programming Lang's:

C, C#, Java, Lisp, MASM, Visual Basic 6
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 5
Reputation: karthikkannan is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 0
karthikkannan karthikkannan is offline Offline
Newbie Poster

Re: please tell me, why we named java as Java 2

 
0
  #8
Jan 17th, 2007
Originally Posted by TylerSBreton View Post
Just a side note...this post is so long that Java has already changed to just Java SE 6, not Java 2 SE anymore.

Basically, leave it alone....it's done.

Regards,

Tyler S. Breton
I dont know what would go wrong if i reply... Anyway it seems to disturb u a lot... :lol: ... Im stopping for your good
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 353
Reputation: aniseed is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 6
aniseed's Avatar
aniseed aniseed is offline Offline
Posting Whiz

Re: please tell me, why we named java as Java 2

 
0
  #9
Jan 18th, 2007
Originally Posted by karthikkannan View Post
I dont know what would go wrong if i reply... Anyway it seems to disturb u a lot... :lol: ... Im stopping for your good
Your answer would be partly correct. Factually, Sun decided to call it Java 2 - second generation or whatever logic they had, because they made a major addition with the Swing package. It included some other significant additions too but the highlighted part was the Swing package as pointed out in the first reply. There is no reason to believe that it was wrong in any sense.

My comment was on the link you posted which is a part of Java 5 documentation by Sun. That obviously was not available at that time.

Finally, nobody but an old thread is disturbed by your reply. It would have hardly made a difference had you not posted.
Last edited by aniseed; Jan 18th, 2007 at 12:05 am.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 5
Reputation: karthikkannan is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 0
karthikkannan karthikkannan is offline Offline
Newbie Poster

Re: please tell me, why we named java as Java 2

 
0
  #10
Jan 18th, 2007
Originally Posted by aniseed View Post
Your answer would be partly correct. Factually, Sun decided to call it Java 2 - second generation or whatever logic they had, because they made a major addition with the Swing package. It included some other significant additions too but the highlighted part was the Swing package as pointed out in the first reply. There is no reason to believe that it was wrong in any sense.

My comment was on the link you posted which is a part of Java 5 documentation by Sun. That obviously was not available at that time.

Finally, nobody but an old thread is disturbed by your reply. It would have hardly made a difference had you not posted.
What you people want to prove or expect from me?

"I'm wrong"
--- I beleive my answer is correct... 2 = AWT+Swing is not acceptable for me (I'm referring to the first answer posted in this thread, not yours). we had J2ME which had no Swing or AWT... Now that 2 is being dropped, are we just using AWT again?:surprised

... My answer was just giving meaning for the number 2. You had given a good explanation. But anyway yours wasn't there. If your answer was here, i wouldn't have replied.

"I had replied for a old post, that is wrong"
--- I agree it may not be useful for person who asked the question. It will be useful for some one who might come across this page while searching in google...

"the link is in Java 5 doc, that didnt exist @ the time of posting"
--- ofcourse, it didnt. I never said it did. But now its available. That's why i have pasted there. What's wrong in it? If I had pasted a link for Java 7 or 9( Now date is: Jan 18th 2007), I can agree it is wrong.

"Hardly no difference"
--- Then y this many comments???????? :p
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Reply

This thread is more than three months old.
Perhaps start a new thread instead?
Message:



Similar Threads
Other Threads in the Java Forum


Views: 4633 | Replies: 14
Thread Tools Search this Thread



Tag cloud for Java
About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | DaniWeb | Acceptable Use Policy | RSS Feed

©2003 - 2009 DaniWeb® LLC