Please support our DaniWeb Community Feedback advertiser: Programming Forums
| View Poll Results: Do you like the changes? | |||
| YES | | 12 | 60.00% |
| NO | | 8 | 40.00% |
| Voters: 20. You may not vote on this poll | |||
Views: 8971 | Replies: 123
![]() |
•
•
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Lawn Guylen, NY
Posts: 11,067
Reputation:
Rep Power: 33
Solved Threads: 118
The advanced reply box too ... no change in font size at all. In fact, the font color was made one shade darker!
DaniWeb does use slightly more resources ... some of the style elements (such as curving the corners of boxes) is now done client-side via JavaScript instead of via CSS. In other words, whereas before there were dozens of little images that needed to be downloaded with each page to give the curved corners effect, now no images are necessary and JavaScript just does the work.
What I found, however, is that once your browser caches the JavaScript file, things get faster quite quickly. Also note that there are all new images throughout the site. Therefore, all of the images you have cached (which you're accustomed to the time it takes to use) will need to be redownloaded. You should definitely give it at least a day or so of use before you start comparing speed differences due to browser caching.
I did put effort into reducing the amount of JavaScript there is. If it is still a problem for a large number of users, I will consider adding an option in the control panel to forfeit curved corners for users with slow CPUs. I really don't think this will be necessary though.
DaniWeb does use slightly more resources ... some of the style elements (such as curving the corners of boxes) is now done client-side via JavaScript instead of via CSS. In other words, whereas before there were dozens of little images that needed to be downloaded with each page to give the curved corners effect, now no images are necessary and JavaScript just does the work.
What I found, however, is that once your browser caches the JavaScript file, things get faster quite quickly. Also note that there are all new images throughout the site. Therefore, all of the images you have cached (which you're accustomed to the time it takes to use) will need to be redownloaded. You should definitely give it at least a day or so of use before you start comparing speed differences due to browser caching.
I did put effort into reducing the amount of JavaScript there is. If it is still a problem for a large number of users, I will consider adding an option in the control panel to forfeit curved corners for users with slow CPUs. I really don't think this will be necessary though.
Last edited by cscgal : May 1st, 2007 at 8:20 pm. Reason: Typo
Dani the Computer Science Gal
•
•
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Lawn Guylen, NY
Posts: 11,067
Reputation:
Rep Power: 33
Solved Threads: 118
Just to add ... did comparisons on like five different PCs and, upon clearing browser cache, curving corners with JS was faster than curving corners with CSS (because of all the small files that needed to be downloaded one at a time in addition to CSS rendering time). So I'm confident this is the better option. I even tested it out on my five year old mac to make sure that it's not too JS intensive for older computers.
Dani the Computer Science Gal
•
•
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Lawn Guylen, NY
Posts: 11,067
Reputation:
Rep Power: 33
Solved Threads: 118
•
•
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Lawn Guylen, NY
Posts: 11,067
Reputation:
Rep Power: 33
Solved Threads: 118
![]() |
•
•
•
•
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)






Linear Mode