View Single Post
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,355
Reputation: Ezzaral has much to be proud of Ezzaral has much to be proud of Ezzaral has much to be proud of Ezzaral has much to be proud of Ezzaral has much to be proud of Ezzaral has much to be proud of Ezzaral has much to be proud of Ezzaral has much to be proud of Ezzaral has much to be proud of Ezzaral has much to be proud of 
Solved Threads: 500
Moderator
Featured Poster
Ezzaral's Avatar
Ezzaral Ezzaral is offline Offline
Industrious Poster

Re: Operator Defining

 
0
  #4
Oct 8th, 2007
Originally Posted by venomlash View Post
Okay, num_reasons_why_cpp_better_than_JAVA++;
thanks anyway, Ezzaral.
Well, you are welcome to that opinion of course, but operator overloading isn't really all that special and probably causes more confusion than it's worth. It's syntactic sugar and might save you a couple characters typing, but you can achieve the exact same functionality with methods that perform the operations and no one has to wonder what "+" or "-" does in a given context.
Reply With Quote