New FireFox -vs- New I.E.

Reply

Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,496
Reputation: WolfPack has a spectacular aura about WolfPack has a spectacular aura about WolfPack has a spectacular aura about 
Solved Threads: 104
Moderator
WolfPack's Avatar
WolfPack WolfPack is offline Offline
Mentally Challenged Mod.

Re: New FireFox -vs- New I.E.

 
0
  #21
Nov 23rd, 2006
Originally Posted by sharky_machine View Post
I read about this a few weeks ago, in the words of Microsoft (paraphrased): "All Windows users will be able to download security patches and service packs no matter the authenticity of their Windows software, while premium downloads such as IE7 will not be authorized to illegal versions."

Why this is exactly I don't know. Perhaps as punishment ? :rolleyes:
Yes. That is what I know too. Maybe MS doesnt think that IE6 is so much a security risk as people make us believe.:-|
バルサミコ酢やっぱいらへんで
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,564
Reputation: mattyd is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 1
Featured Poster
mattyd's Avatar
mattyd mattyd is offline Offline
Posting Maven

Re: New FireFox -vs- New I.E.

 
0
  #22
Nov 24th, 2006
Last edited by mattyd; Nov 24th, 2006 at 12:36 am.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 207
Reputation: rixius is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 1
rixius rixius is offline Offline
Posting Whiz in Training

Re: New FireFox -vs- New I.E.

 
0
  #23
Mar 6th, 2008
: ) I still prefer firefox, although I am glad Microsoft has finally put out something decent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,602
Reputation: scru has a spectacular aura about scru has a spectacular aura about 
Solved Threads: 130
Featured Poster
scru's Avatar
scru scru is offline Offline
Posting Virtuoso

Re: New FireFox -vs- New I.E.

 
0
  #24
Mar 7th, 2008
Personally, I have no preference. Honestly. Sometimes I'd find myself using Firefox, other times IE. Firefox 3 *does* have some cool features, but they're more like the new features in Vista, than say an actual product revision. Not really enough to warrant me making a cold switch.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,181
Reputation: hollystyles will become famous soon enough hollystyles will become famous soon enough 
Solved Threads: 67
hollystyles's Avatar
hollystyles hollystyles is offline Offline
Veteran Poster

Re: New FireFox -vs- New I.E.

 
0
  #25
Mar 7th, 2008
I love FF for it's extensions, I can browse without a mouse, squash all the adds, interogate HTTP Headers ... etc etc etc If I need IE rendering for a non-standards site right click the FF tab and switch rendering engine.

I prefer IE's dev toolbar add-in though and thats when I use IE mostly. IE is perceptably slower to me particularly opening new tabs. It makes my teeth grind sometimes.
==========================================
Yadda yadda yadda...
Web junky, fevered monkey
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,183
Reputation: GrimJack will become famous soon enough GrimJack will become famous soon enough 
Solved Threads: 15
Featured Poster
GrimJack's Avatar
GrimJack GrimJack is offline Offline
Postaholic

Re: New FireFox -vs- New I.E.

 
0
  #26
Mar 7th, 2008
I use FF because I don't like advertising all over my screen. I particularly hate those roll-over and scroller adds that require that click to close. There may be add-ons to IE that do the same thing but I have not found them (or really tried). I only use IE7 when I am contracted to a house that requires it.

MS is a for-profit business - I can not imagine them being as vigilantly anti-adverts as FF which is a non-profit business. And, of course, I don't trust MS to do anything that interferes with their bottom line. This is why I choose to use Google for all my searching needs, they try very hard to separate search results from advertising. I once used yahoo to search Alzheimer's and got the message "you can purchase Alzheimer's at ----"
Imagine a world without hypotheticals....
You can have my book when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,580
Reputation: Infarction has a spectacular aura about Infarction has a spectacular aura about Infarction has a spectacular aura about 
Solved Threads: 52
Infarction's Avatar
Infarction Infarction is offline Offline
Battle Programmer

Re: New FireFox -vs- New I.E.

 
0
  #27
Mar 7th, 2008
Out of curiosity, have any of you tried out the new IE yet? Any thoughts on how it compares?

(disclaimer: I'm not using it yet either... )
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,602
Reputation: scru has a spectacular aura about scru has a spectacular aura about 
Solved Threads: 130
Featured Poster
scru's Avatar
scru scru is offline Offline
Posting Virtuoso

Re: New FireFox -vs- New I.E.

 
0
  #28
Mar 7th, 2008
Originally Posted by GrimJack View Post
I don't trust MS to do anything that interferes with their bottom line. This is why I choose to use Google for all my searching needs, they try very hard to separate search results from advertising.
Haha, because Google is *so* much less of a corporation that MS is. As for the advertising, it's not so much that Google wants to hide their ads from you, no, they're just a lot more sneaky with them.

I say anybody who trusts one corporation while denouncing another, especially Google over MS, needs therapy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,183
Reputation: GrimJack will become famous soon enough GrimJack will become famous soon enough 
Solved Threads: 15
Featured Poster
GrimJack's Avatar
GrimJack GrimJack is offline Offline
Postaholic

Re: New FireFox -vs- New I.E.

 
0
  #29
Mar 7th, 2008
Originally Posted by scru View Post
Haha, because Google is *so* much less of a corporation that MS is. As for the advertising, it's not so much that Google wants to hide their ads from you, no, they're just a lot more sneaky with them.

I say anybody who trusts one corporation while denouncing another, especially Google over MS, needs therapy.
NO! NO! NO! Google puts their paid ads along the top and the right side; whereas, MS and Yahoo put their paid ads within the search results so there is no distinction. The more you pay, the higher up in the search results are.

and NO! NO! NO! I do not trust google - I use NoScript to block googlesyndication and google-analytics; I do not use googletools or google desktop.

I use trackmenot to confuse search engines; I use TrashMail to confuse registrations.

I use EQuakeAlert to see what is happening geologically around the world (there was an M-5 quake in Indonesia
Imagine a world without hypotheticals....
You can have my book when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 12,040
Reputation: cscgal is a glorious beacon of light cscgal is a glorious beacon of light cscgal is a glorious beacon of light cscgal is a glorious beacon of light cscgal is a glorious beacon of light cscgal is a glorious beacon of light 
Solved Threads: 127
Administrator
Staff Writer
cscgal's Avatar
cscgal cscgal is offline Offline
The Queen of DaniWeb

Re: New FireFox -vs- New I.E.

 
0
  #30
Mar 8th, 2008
> MS and Yahoo put their paid ads within the search results so there is no distinction

GOTO.com (later renamed to Overture) used to do this. Once they were bought out by Yahoo!, they stopped and took on a structure similar to Google. I don't use MSN so I cannot be 100% sure but I don't believe they do this either.
Dani the Computer Science Gal
Follow my Twitter feed! twitter.com/daniweb
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Reply

This thread is more than three months old.
Perhaps start a new thread instead?
Message:



Similar Threads
Other Threads in the Geeks' Lounge Forum
Thread Tools Search this Thread



About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | DaniWeb | Acceptable Use Policy | RSS Feed

©2003 - 2009 DaniWeb® LLC