| | |
Windows 2003 DNS
![]() |
•
•
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
The company I work for has a dedicated server with Windows 2003 installed. We primarily use it as a web server and file storage system for our virtual employees.
When I was registering a new domain name at Register.com, I realized that the majority of the domain names we own are not pointed at out DNS server, but instead use the register.com DNS servers. The IP addresses at register.com are then set to our server's IP address.
My question is what would be the best practice?
I can setup a DNS server for the box and then tell all other domains at register.com to use it. Or, I can keep the configuration the same and just tell register.com which IPs to use. As it is right now, it just seems unorganized.
When I was registering a new domain name at Register.com, I realized that the majority of the domain names we own are not pointed at out DNS server, but instead use the register.com DNS servers. The IP addresses at register.com are then set to our server's IP address.
My question is what would be the best practice?
I can setup a DNS server for the box and then tell all other domains at register.com to use it. Or, I can keep the configuration the same and just tell register.com which IPs to use. As it is right now, it just seems unorganized.
•
•
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 392
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 40
I would point each name directly to your DNS server. Going through register.com's DNS server adds another point of failure.
Eric
MCSE, MCP, A+, Network+
Managed IT Services Houston | Outsource IT Support Houston Texas
PinnacleReviews.com | Customer Reviews
MCSE, MCP, A+, Network+
Managed IT Services Houston | Outsource IT Support Houston Texas
PinnacleReviews.com | Customer Reviews
•
•
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
That's a good point Eric. I hadn't really thought of that. I was thinking that if our server's IP address ever needed to be changed, then I'd have to go back to register.com and manually change the IP address of the 60+ domain names we own.
Do you know if there is a performance hit (on our server) if the 60+ domain names were set to our DNS server (which is on the same physical server that runs our websites, email server, etc)?
Do you know if there is a performance hit (on our server) if the 60+ domain names were set to our DNS server (which is on the same physical server that runs our websites, email server, etc)?
•
•
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 392
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 40
I would expect technically there to be a performance hit, since your server is doing more work. In the real world,you probably wouldn't notice depending on your hardware and the current workload.
Eric
MCSE, MCP, A+, Network+
Managed IT Services Houston | Outsource IT Support Houston Texas
PinnacleReviews.com | Customer Reviews
MCSE, MCP, A+, Network+
Managed IT Services Houston | Outsource IT Support Houston Texas
PinnacleReviews.com | Customer Reviews
![]() |
Other Threads in the Windows NT / 2000 / XP Forum
- Previous Thread: How to remove references to previous users?
- Next Thread: Problem while giving permission to a file in windows 2003 server
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
.net 3.5 3daccelertion 64bit 2010 activedirectory alaris android apache application arm auto black blue book boot cellphones chinese collaboration combofix computer computerfreezes crash desktop desktops domain dotnetnuke drive error errors explorer features firefox folder fonts freeze gadgets hardware install intel killprocess laptop laptops latitude lcd linux load mac markshuttleworth microsoft minimalizes mobile monitor netbooks novell nvidia opensource operatingsystems options oracle osinstallationproblem osx outlook partition patch port product proxy raid rds reformat remotedesktopconnection retail screen server. sp1 sp3 spyware studios ubuntu unreadable update upgrade usb verizon videogames virtual virus vulnerability wab webos weecam win win32/heur window windows windows7 windowsxp worm xp






