•
•
•
•
What is DaniWeb IT Discussion Community?
You're currently browsing the Geeks' Lounge section within the Coffee House category of DaniWeb, a massive community of 425,775 software developers, web developers, Internet marketers, and tech gurus who are all enthusiastic about making contacts, networking, and learning from each other. In fact, there are 3,351 IT professionals currently interacting right now! Registration is free, only takes a minute and lets you enjoy all of the interactive features of the site.
Please support our Geeks' Lounge advertiser: Programming Forums
Views: 3035 | Replies: 74
 |
•
•
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 5,752
Reputation: 
Rep Power: 18
Solved Threads: 199
VI works on everything, twomers. It's omnipotent.
As people are clearly allowed to attack me but I'm not allowed to defend myself, I no longer post to this site.
•
•
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South East England
Posts: 2,513
Reputation:
Rep Power: 7
Solved Threads: 40
Well creationism, would imply an overlord being that has power beyond anything else that the earthlings could muster. But how would such a being be able to live before the big bang? Physics would not allow such a being to exist, before time itself. And evolution is far more plausible seeing as there is a whole heap of evidence supporting it. So my vote is with Evolution.
The Great Lord, Serunson.
"Knows a little bit about a lot"
Quote from scru :: "If you were a file I'd hit delete."
"Knows a little bit about a lot"
Quote from scru :: "If you were a file I'd hit delete."
•
•
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 45
Reputation:
Rep Power: 1
Solved Threads: 2
Light Poster
•
•
•
•
Originally Posted by twomers 
I read somewhere that regular expressions don't work on people, vegaseat...
yeah but I was talking about politicians not people
•
•
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 5,752
Reputation:
Rep Power: 18
Solved Threads: 199
The Big Bang brought into existence the universe. There are however theories that the universe isn't the only one, that supreme being that created it could well be just a schoolkid starting some experiment in their equivalent of a glass tube or petridish somewhere outside the universe 
As people are clearly allowed to attack me but I'm not allowed to defend myself, I no longer post to this site.
•
•
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,620
Reputation: 
Rep Power: 17
Solved Threads: 142
At one time the Big Bang was "proof" of the existence of God. [It's always fun to watch how recorded history is changed over time.]
However that particular linked-and-search-for argument "turned out", I'm quite sure the question remains, and will remain, unanswered for many.
However that particular linked-and-search-for argument "turned out", I'm quite sure the question remains, and will remain, unanswered for many.
•
•
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Posts: 1,063
Reputation:
Rep Power: 7
Solved Threads: 8
It is always a problem when someone tries to 'prove' god or religion with the current scientific paradigm. I remember Dancing Wu Li Master and various junk pieces by Frijhaf (sp) Kapra from the '70s trying to tie Eastern Mysticism to quantum mathematics; later, in the '80s 'they' were trying to use string theory to prove their theories. Generally, it is not a good idea to try to prove science by quoting faith and/or faith by science.
If only ignorance were painful....
GrimJack
AMD a64 3200+ 939
ASUS A8V Deluxe
G-force 7300GT/512meg AGP
GrimJack
AMD a64 3200+ 939
ASUS A8V Deluxe
G-force 7300GT/512meg AGP
•
•
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Newfoundland, Canada
Posts: 305
Reputation:
Rep Power: 1
Solved Threads: 3
Posting Whiz
using one to prove the other is an oxymoron.
The string theory.....I like to see that someone else is familiar with this.
How about anti-matter, are you familiar with this as well.
Scince is what intrigues me, though i have little time to devote to learning when putting food on the table for my family is so hard. My plans were to be a genetic engineer and **** off all the religious types.
The string theory.....I like to see that someone else is familiar with this.
How about anti-matter, are you familiar with this as well.
Scince is what intrigues me, though i have little time to devote to learning when putting food on the table for my family is so hard. My plans were to be a genetic engineer and **** off all the religious types.
An eye for an eye and the world would be blind.
•
•
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Old Hampshire, Old England (LOL)
Posts: 11,937
Reputation:
Rep Power: 30
Solved Threads: 268
•
•
•
•
using one to prove the other is an oxymoron.
no its not. Look up the definition.
look up straw arguments
TRY MY SUGGESTIONS AT YOUR OWN RISK!
james.bennet1@ntlworld.com
james.bennet1@ntlworld.com
•
•
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 3,369
Reputation:
Rep Power: 8
Solved Threads: 18
•
•
•
•
Originally Posted by steven woodman
How about anti-matter, are you familiar with this as well.
We had a thread about dark matter at one point; I think anti-matter was mentioned in it too.
I think this is where anti-matter was first mentioned.
Dark Matter .
Last edited by jasimp : May 23rd, 2008 at 4:39 pm.
A room without books is like a body without a soul.
Facts are meaningless. They can be used to prove anything that is even remotely true.
Go then, there are other worlds than these.
Facts are meaningless. They can be used to prove anything that is even remotely true.
Go then, there are other worlds than these.
|
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
DaniWeb Geeks' Lounge Marketplace
•
•
•
•
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Linear Mode
Similar Threads
- Collins: Why this scientist believes in God (Geeks' Lounge)
- Water Discovered on Mars? (Geeks' Lounge)
Other Threads in the Geeks' Lounge Forum
- Previous Thread: Drug testing in schools
- Next Thread: Poison Tylenol of the 80s
