•
•
•
•
What is DaniWeb IT Discussion Community?
You're currently browsing the Geeks' Lounge section within the Coffee House category of DaniWeb, a massive community of 426,811 software developers, web developers, Internet marketers, and tech gurus who are all enthusiastic about making contacts, networking, and learning from each other. In fact, there are 1,924 IT professionals currently interacting right now! Registration is free, only takes a minute and lets you enjoy all of the interactive features of the site.
Please support our Geeks' Lounge advertiser: Programming Forums
Views: 8838 | Replies: 163
![]() |
•
•
•
•
I'm no scientist, but I do entertain opposing arguments -- much akin to the scientific method -- and try to consider the whole.
But the arguments have to be valid. Affirming the consequent is an invalid argument.
•
•
•
•
Scientists are NOT going to make simple logical mistakes as MidiMagic suggested.
Social and environmental scientists usually can't perform experiments, because they will destroy the only sample they have if they try any experimentation. So they observe and record data, and make conjectures.
Last edited by MidiMagic : Jun 20th, 2007 at 10:21 pm.
Daylight-saving time uses more gasoline
•
•
•
•
If you do reseaarch on global warming, it will be very difficult to get funding, if you do not subscripe to the 'gorist' junk science view of things. As jwenting says, this view has been elevated to the status of a religion.
•
•
•
•
I do not think that a scientist is going to publish a paper or do research against global warming because nobody would give them the funding to do so. Mainly because it would make the company funding them look bad. Where as there is alot more funding out there for research proving it because it makes the company giving the funding look like they care about the enviroment.
•
•
•
•
All of the claims I presented as being global warming claims came from the Discovery Channel special as quotes by actual "experts".
Oh, WOW! You are clearly an expert now.
Last edited by joshSCH : Jun 21st, 2007 at 12:54 am.
•
•
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 999
Reputation:
Rep Power: 4
Solved Threads: 1
•
•
•
•
What? I can't see all scientists posting data simply because their publishers and benefactors said to.. Theres no way that some scientist wouldn't publish truthful information.
It's not always a matter of publishing truthful information, it's a matter of making certain the truthful information is made widely known. I don't have the exact reference on hand at the moment (I'll try to grab a notebook and write it all down later today) but I remember a fairly interesting bit I read recently involving research done on the chemical substance we call DDT that faced that exact problem.
The basic gist was this:
1. Experiment done. Result: "Ooh, DDT Bad!"
2. Results published in well-known magazine.
3. Experimental error found. Experiment redone. Result: "We were wrong before."
4. Results taken to same well-known magazine.
5. Well-known magazine rejects new-experiment story because it isn't anti-DDT.
6. New-experiment results finally published in mostly-unknown magazine.
Yes, the truthful information was eventually published. But those who only read the well-known magazine, and not the little-known one, never heard about it. It goes back to my description of the gatekeepers of the community. It's far easier to keep popular opinion going the way you want if you emphasize the side you agree with and de-emphasize that you disagree with.
•
•
•
•
Besides, global warming has two sides. The Republicans would rather it not be happening, its in their best interest if businesses didn't have to spend a buttload of cash 'saving' the environment from global warming.. Theres always two sides.. and I would think the republicans would be trying desperately to get scientific evidence out there that global warming is not occurring.. especially since they're typically the wealthier party.
So how come the evidence of publication factors seems to indicate that most non-academic publishers (the ones who can sway public opinion; public opinion is one of the best weapons for and against research I can think of) will blanketly accept the 'Pro-warming' arguments and evidence, but blanketly reject the 'Anti-warming' arguments and evidence? Sure, there are two sides, but they're not being viewed equally nor given equal weight in presentation.
"No trees were harmed in the production of this post. However, several electrons were severely inconvenienced."
Kumquat.
Kumquat.
Americans for Prosperity Crashes Al Gore's Speech
Note to mods about me reviving this old thread: I didn't want to create yet another one of these.
Note to mods about me reviving this old thread: I didn't want to create yet another one of these.
•
•
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Posts: 1,089
Reputation:
Rep Power: 7
Solved Threads: 8
Heh, heh, Ene - I was suckered too. But then again, you notice that this revival did not even add to the discussion; just some BS from out of the blue. Next, Dave will post the 3 typos in AG's book that prove it is all lies. Sigh! He's got nothing.
Move along, nothing to see here.
Move along, nothing to see here.
If only ignorance were painful....
GrimJack
AMD a64 3200+ 939
ASUS A8V Deluxe
G-force 7300GT/512meg AGP
GrimJack
AMD a64 3200+ 939
ASUS A8V Deluxe
G-force 7300GT/512meg AGP
That post was for fun. If you want me to add to the discussion, I'll submit this.
•
•
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Posts: 1,089
Reputation:
Rep Power: 7
Solved Threads: 8
Now this post is INTERESTING and thought-provoking - I knew you had it in you.
Give me a couple hours for research before I accept this guy's word on what he did for a living and what other researchers say on the same topic.
Give me a couple hours for research before I accept this guy's word on what he did for a living and what other researchers say on the same topic.
If only ignorance were painful....
GrimJack
AMD a64 3200+ 939
ASUS A8V Deluxe
G-force 7300GT/512meg AGP
GrimJack
AMD a64 3200+ 939
ASUS A8V Deluxe
G-force 7300GT/512meg AGP
•
•
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Posts: 1,089
Reputation:
Rep Power: 7
Solved Threads: 8
Dave, I know you are not particularly vested in much of what you post, and I honestly enjoy the research you force me to do. I will take each of David Evans point by point: This couldn't be more wrong. Here are some of the signatures he says are missing. Granted this is from a site that states "Climate Science from Climate Scientists" so you might consider them 'differently' focused than someone who writes for "The Australian" which has been a climate change denier for the last decade. This is pure denial - as if he denies it often enough it will become true see:
The blue bands show temperature changes modelled using only natural forcings, while the red bands include anthropogenic forcings as well. The black line shows observations. Clearly, we must include anthropogenic forcings if we want to match the observations. The 2nd picture is just pure joy to look at and though it supports my point I don't want add too much more 'science' to this post -- I could also 'nitpick' rest of his points but why bother, the pattern continues.
•
•
•
•
1. The greenhouse signature is missing. We have been looking and measuring for years, and cannot find it.
•
•
•
•
2 There is no evidence to support the idea that carbon emissions cause significant global warming. None.
The blue bands show temperature changes modelled using only natural forcings, while the red bands include anthropogenic forcings as well. The black line shows observations. Clearly, we must include anthropogenic forcings if we want to match the observations. The 2nd picture is just pure joy to look at and though it supports my point I don't want add too much more 'science' to this post -- I could also 'nitpick' rest of his points but why bother, the pattern continues.
Last edited by GrimJack : Jul 21st, 2008 at 2:11 am. Reason: had to add a logical negative so the statement said what I meant
If only ignorance were painful....
GrimJack
AMD a64 3200+ 939
ASUS A8V Deluxe
G-force 7300GT/512meg AGP
GrimJack
AMD a64 3200+ 939
ASUS A8V Deluxe
G-force 7300GT/512meg AGP
![]() |
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
DaniWeb Geeks' Lounge Marketplace
•
•
•
•
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Other Threads in the Geeks' Lounge Forum
- Previous Thread: Websites NOT to refer people to
- Next Thread: What happens when protons are passed through helium gas chamber?



Linear Mode