| | |
Best Linux Server Version
![]() |
•
•
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 160
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 3
I have been looking over and researching different versions of linux for my server that I am going to be making and I am not sure which one is the best for having a server or does it even matter. I also want one that will be very quick since it will be a server so is it possible to get one without all the fancy graphical GUI's and more of just like a command prompt or something. I was looking into Debian and Fedora but I am a little lost with all this stuff now. Any help is appreciated, thanks.
>is debian like a command line interface?
It is if you don't install X. If you're going to install Debian, I recommend downloading the net-install CD anyway. There's no real reason to download all 20 CDs unless you're installing a lot of X applications without an internet connection.
It is if you don't install X. If you're going to install Debian, I recommend downloading the net-install CD anyway. There's no real reason to download all 20 CDs unless you're installing a lot of X applications without an internet connection.
"Technological progress is like an axe in the hands of a pathological criminal."
All my posts may be freely redistributed under the terms of the MIT license.
All my posts may be freely redistributed under the terms of the MIT license.
>How about Fedora? Is it good for a server?
Fedora is the consumer "desktop" distro made by Red Hat. If you want their server distro, you'll want to take a look at Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), or CentOS, which is essentially a free version of RHEL.
Fedora is the consumer "desktop" distro made by Red Hat. If you want their server distro, you'll want to take a look at Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), or CentOS, which is essentially a free version of RHEL.
"Technological progress is like an axe in the hands of a pathological criminal."
All my posts may be freely redistributed under the terms of the MIT license.
All my posts may be freely redistributed under the terms of the MIT license.
On the other hand, Gentoo has a software model that might be undesirable for a server operating system. Generally speaking, as a source-based distro, Gentoo tends to be bleeding edge, and while there's a server overlay, that isn't quite enough. Servers OSs need software that's been tried and true, and often need support for legacy software. The Gentoo developers spend very little time backporting and maintainig old packages, so often you're forced to upgrade to the latest -- which may not be the greatest.
"Technological progress is like an axe in the hands of a pathological criminal."
All my posts may be freely redistributed under the terms of the MIT license.
All my posts may be freely redistributed under the terms of the MIT license.
![]() |
Similar Threads
- What's better? Windows 2000 Server or Linux Server? (Windows Servers and IIS)
- Linux newbie, which version for a server? (Getting Started and Choosing a Distro)
- Mail Server... (Getting Started and Choosing a Distro)
- New to Linux (Getting Started and Choosing a Distro)
Other Threads in the Getting Started and Choosing a Distro Forum
- Previous Thread: configure ubuntu guest os as a linux server on a windows host os
- Next Thread: Which Linux for this configuration?
Views: 8255 | Replies: 21
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Tag cloud for Getting Started and Choosing a Distro
age-related android baremetal chrome cio cloud cloudcomputing code commercial computers crystalballsunday desktop developers development distributions distro dsl elderly embedded filesystems forums google http://expertcore.org/ innovations jauntyjackalope joe_brockmeier kernel library linus linux microsoft multi-core netgear newbies novell openoffice.org opensuse open_source operating operatingsystems parallel performance processing redhat routers smp solaris studios system systembuilders systemintegrators terminalservices thecloud thinclients tools ubuntu users virtualization vmware webbased wikis windows xenon






