| | |
Design Pattern - Proxy
![]() |
•
•
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
Hello,
I'm implementing a software module and hesitating about the appropriate design. The client needs to perform operations for an componenet which is divided to few parts in the memory. However the client treats the componenet as one contiguous.
My design includes a "Manager" which has an interface for the client and handles all operations for this components. The "Manager" knows when it is asked to read/write the appropriate part of the memory. It hides the fact that the component is divided to few parts in the memory space.
I wonder if this is called a proxy, facade or a bridge? Or maybe other pattern? I think it is a proxy but not sure since there few real objects (i.e. subjects) and not only one.
In case this is a proxy - must I use also the "subject" or can the client use the proxy object directly? I don't see the point to "subject" and it will just cause to more unnecessary files and code.
Thanks in advance,
Ilan
I'm implementing a software module and hesitating about the appropriate design. The client needs to perform operations for an componenet which is divided to few parts in the memory. However the client treats the componenet as one contiguous.
My design includes a "Manager" which has an interface for the client and handles all operations for this components. The "Manager" knows when it is asked to read/write the appropriate part of the memory. It hides the fact that the component is divided to few parts in the memory space.
I wonder if this is called a proxy, facade or a bridge? Or maybe other pattern? I think it is a proxy but not sure since there few real objects (i.e. subjects) and not only one.
In case this is a proxy - must I use also the "subject" or can the client use the proxy object directly? I don't see the point to "subject" and it will just cause to more unnecessary files and code.
Thanks in advance,
Ilan
My design pattern knowledge is not too good, but try visiting www.dofactory.com .it summarises design patterns nicely
•
•
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
Hi
I think you'd better use Chain-of-Responsibility, it's supposed to fit your need as i figured, see more here: http://www.dofactory.com/Patterns/Pa...in.aspx#_self2
David
I think you'd better use Chain-of-Responsibility, it's supposed to fit your need as i figured, see more here: http://www.dofactory.com/Patterns/Pa...in.aspx#_self2
David
![]() |
Similar Threads
- Design pattern for encode/decode modules (C++)
- Factory design pattern (C++)
- Design pattern for encode/decode modules (Computer Science)
- Factory Design pattern implementation (C++)
- software design questions (Computer Science)
Other Threads in the Computer Science Forum
- Previous Thread: object-oriented design’s sequence diagrams
- Next Thread: Towers of Hanoi
Views: 2927 | Replies: 2
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Tag cloud for Computer Science
ai algorithm algorithms architecture assembly assignment assignmenthelp assignments binary bizarre bletchleypark blogging book brunel cern cheating-failed clueless code codebreaker compiler computer computers control conversion copyright cryptography data-base database development dfa dissertation dissertationtopic education extensions github givemetehcodez government graphics guidelines history homework homeworkassignment homeworkhelp ibm ideas impress info information insertion introductory itcontracts jobs language lazy lighthouse lincence linkbait marketing method mobileapplication ms nerd networkingprojects news notation offtopic openoffice os parser problem programming project ps3 quick recursion result sam-being-cute science security servers skills software sorting spoonfeeding sql sql-server stephenfry student student-gets-caught supercomputing syntactic telecom time traffic tree uk verify visualbasic writer ww2





