Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

Reply

Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,183
Reputation: GrimJack will become famous soon enough GrimJack will become famous soon enough 
Solved Threads: 15
Featured Poster
GrimJack's Avatar
GrimJack GrimJack is offline Offline
Postaholic

Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

 
0
  #1
Oct 27th, 2008
Standards:
No ad hominem attacks
No insults

An argument is, to quote the Monty Python sketch, "a connected series of statements to establish a definite proposition."

Please try to avoid the major logical fallacies.
Definition - Theory:
In science a theory is a testable model of the manner of interaction of a set of natural phenomena, capable of predicting future occurrences or observations of the same kind, and capable of being tested through experiment or otherwise verified through empirical observation.
Definition - Evolution:
Evolution is usually defined simply as changes in trait or gene frequency in a population of organisms from one generation to the next. However, "evolution" is often used to include the following additional claims:
1. Differences in trait composition between isolated populations over many generations may result in the origin of new species.
2. All living organisms alive today have descended from a common ancestor (or ancestral gene pool).

Various famous people say:
Judge a man by his questions rather than by his answers.
--Voltaire (1694-1778)
A definition is no proof.
--William Pinkney, American diplomat (1764-1822)
A theory is more impressive the greater the simplicity of its premises, the more different the kinds of things it relates and the more extended its range of applicability.
--Albert Einstein, 1949
If anyone wants to add anything to the definitions or rules, now is as good a time as any - or jump right in with your argument. Please feel free to argue with any part of this post.
Last edited by GrimJack; Oct 27th, 2008 at 11:05 pm.
Imagine a world without hypotheticals....
You can have my book when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 15,378
Reputation: Ancient Dragon has a reputation beyond repute Ancient Dragon has a reputation beyond repute Ancient Dragon has a reputation beyond repute Ancient Dragon has a reputation beyond repute Ancient Dragon has a reputation beyond repute Ancient Dragon has a reputation beyond repute Ancient Dragon has a reputation beyond repute Ancient Dragon has a reputation beyond repute Ancient Dragon has a reputation beyond repute Ancient Dragon has a reputation beyond repute Ancient Dragon has a reputation beyond repute 
Solved Threads: 1466
Team Colleague
Featured Poster
Ancient Dragon's Avatar
Ancient Dragon Ancient Dragon is offline Offline
Still Learning

Re: Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

 
0
  #2
Oct 27th, 2008
I know many people mistakenly believe evolution is a fact while its actually nothing more than just a good (ok very good) theory. There is no way to prove evolution, just as there is no way to prove creationism. We can believe all we want but that doesn't make it fact. We can test short evolution durations, say between two or three generations or so but there is no way to show how (or if) one species evolves into an entirely different species.

I'm not arguing that evolution doesn't exit -- only that it isn't a proven fact.

Creationism, on the otherhand, is on an even shaker grounds than evolution. Its not even possible to create a theory about intelligent creation. I do think there was intelligent design when creating the universe. Something, or someone, had to create the universe -- it didn't just happen out of nothing. Even if you believe the Big Bang theory, someone had to create that mass that exploded.

My though is that the Bible correctly tells us who created the universe, but what it doesn't tell us is how it was created. We will never know the true answer to that, but it probably started with the Big Bang. When the Earth cooled down enough to support life then evolution took hold, and over a few billion years we humans evolved into what we are today.
Don't PM me with questions -- you might get a nasty PM in response. If you have a question then post it in one of the forums.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,031
Reputation: Aia has much to be proud of Aia has much to be proud of Aia has much to be proud of Aia has much to be proud of Aia has much to be proud of Aia has much to be proud of Aia has much to be proud of Aia has much to be proud of Aia has much to be proud of Aia has much to be proud of 
Solved Threads: 177
Aia's Avatar
Aia Aia is offline Offline
Postaholic

Re: Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

 
0
  #3
Oct 27th, 2008
...And they lived happily ever after. The end.
Last edited by Aia; Oct 27th, 2008 at 11:54 pm. Reason: Making The end prettier
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,813
Reputation: VernonDozier has a reputation beyond repute VernonDozier has a reputation beyond repute VernonDozier has a reputation beyond repute VernonDozier has a reputation beyond repute VernonDozier has a reputation beyond repute VernonDozier has a reputation beyond repute VernonDozier has a reputation beyond repute VernonDozier has a reputation beyond repute VernonDozier has a reputation beyond repute VernonDozier has a reputation beyond repute VernonDozier has a reputation beyond repute 
Solved Threads: 501
Featured Poster
VernonDozier VernonDozier is offline Offline
Senior Poster

Re: Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

 
0
  #4
Oct 28th, 2008
Best argument for evolution: We've seen it happen and verified it many times in other animals like flies, which have lifespans short enough and have enough offspring per generation that we can see it quickly. Human beings just don't change fast enough, but if we've seen other living beings evolve, why couldn't we have too?

Worst argument against evolution: It doesn't explain everything, so we can toss the whole theory out. (I imagine that's one of the fallacies you listed. Haven't checked the link yet).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 849
Reputation: R0bb0b is on a distinguished road 
Solved Threads: 67
R0bb0b's Avatar
R0bb0b R0bb0b is offline Offline
Practically a Posting Shark

Re: Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

 
0
  #5
Oct 28th, 2008
Originally Posted by VernonDozier View Post
We've seen it happen and verified it many times in other animals like flies, which have lifespans short enough and have enough offspring per generation that we can see it quickly.
Can you provide a link?
“Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind.” - Dr. Seuss

-- The documentation is inevitable, you may get away with it for a little while but eventually you too will have to do the deed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,092
Reputation: hughv is on a distinguished road 
Solved Threads: 87
hughv hughv is offline Offline
Veteran Poster

Re: Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

 
0
  #6
Oct 28th, 2008
BS, PH, CIB
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,009
Reputation: vegaseat is just really nice vegaseat is just really nice vegaseat is just really nice vegaseat is just really nice vegaseat is just really nice 
Solved Threads: 928
Moderator
vegaseat's Avatar
vegaseat vegaseat is offline Offline
DaniWeb's Hypocrite

Re: Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

 
0
  #7
Oct 28th, 2008
Originally Posted by Ancient Dragon View Post
...
Something, or someone, had to create the universe -- it didn't just happen out of nothing. Even if you believe the Big Bang theory, someone had to create that mass that exploded.
...
In that line of thinking, who created the creator?

Big Bang only relates to the universe we know, and the tiny fraction of time we think we understand. Evolution is an event of time and time is endless.
Last edited by vegaseat; Oct 28th, 2008 at 7:45 am.
May 'the Google' be with you!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 391
Reputation: steven woodman is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 4
steven woodman's Avatar
steven woodman steven woodman is offline Offline
Posting Whiz

Re: Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

 
0
  #8
Oct 28th, 2008
Genes change from one generation to the next. That is evolution and that we know is a fact. The purpose of these genes changing through the random selection of genetic material in the gametes during meiosis occurs in order for life to survive. Without changing genes (or evolution) through successive generations, all offspring would be identical to there parents and therefore, unable to run faster, jump higher, think quicker etc. Being different from one another allows for survival of the fittest, in which case if a predator is faster, then the faster prey will survive and hence, be more likely to pass the gene which made it faster to its offspring. Eventually this will create a faster animal and through thousands of generations a new branch of the family which it originally came.

One major factor which causes these separations of genetic similarity, is segregation or separation from the same family. This can be caused by land forms or different migration patterns. Eventually one group of the same family would have to adapt to different surroundings through survival of the fittest and therefore become a dissimilar family.

These above statements do not take into account random genetic mutation, which may also cause variation in genetic make up from one generation to the next.

I, personally, think that to deny evolution is just ignorance. And remember, the route word of ignorance is "Ignore". To simply ignore things that are as plane as day doesn't make sense.
An eye for an eye and the world would be blind.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,411
Reputation: William Hemsworth has much to be proud of William Hemsworth has much to be proud of William Hemsworth has much to be proud of William Hemsworth has much to be proud of William Hemsworth has much to be proud of William Hemsworth has much to be proud of William Hemsworth has much to be proud of William Hemsworth has much to be proud of William Hemsworth has much to be proud of 
Solved Threads: 114
Sponsor
William Hemsworth William Hemsworth is offline Offline
Nearly a Posting Virtuoso

Re: Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

 
0
  #9
Oct 28th, 2008
100 Reasons why Evolution is so stupid
Some good points are mentioned in this (rather long) video, but no where near enough to stop me believing in evolution but personally, I dont think he knows what hes talking about 95% of the time
Last edited by William Hemsworth; Oct 28th, 2008 at 12:02 pm.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 391
Reputation: steven woodman is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 4
steven woodman's Avatar
steven woodman steven woodman is offline Offline
Posting Whiz

Re: Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

 
1
  #10
Oct 28th, 2008
I got about two minutes into that video and i can think of 100 reasons he is stupid. Man some people just dont get it.
An eye for an eye and the world would be blind.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Reply

This thread is more than three months old.
Perhaps start a new thread instead?
Message:



Similar Threads
Other Threads in the Geeks' Lounge Forum
Thread Tools Search this Thread



About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | DaniWeb | Acceptable Use Policy | RSS Feed

©2003 - 2009 DaniWeb® LLC