Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

Reply

Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,813
Reputation: VernonDozier has a reputation beyond repute VernonDozier has a reputation beyond repute VernonDozier has a reputation beyond repute VernonDozier has a reputation beyond repute VernonDozier has a reputation beyond repute VernonDozier has a reputation beyond repute VernonDozier has a reputation beyond repute VernonDozier has a reputation beyond repute VernonDozier has a reputation beyond repute VernonDozier has a reputation beyond repute VernonDozier has a reputation beyond repute 
Solved Threads: 501
Featured Poster
VernonDozier VernonDozier is offline Offline
Senior Poster

Re: Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

 
0
  #11
Oct 28th, 2008
Originally Posted by R0bb0b View Post
Can you provide a link?
I can't really beat hughv's link, but here's one discussing fruit-flies' evolutionary immunity to DDT.

http://www.terradaily.com/reports/DD...ce_Spread.html

It's a perfect example of natural selection. If you're immune to DDT, you live and pass on the gene. If you're not, you die and you don't pass on the genes which are vulnerable to DDT. Same thing with the penicillin-resistant super-bacteria.

No reason to think human beings don't exhibit the same behavior, except on a lesser scale. I'm sure the 1918 flu epidemic caused us to be a much more resilient species, as did the Bubonic Plague earlier. People with weaker immune systems died and didn't pass their genes on. Those with stronger immune systems survived and had children.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 849
Reputation: R0bb0b is on a distinguished road 
Solved Threads: 67
R0bb0b's Avatar
R0bb0b R0bb0b is offline Offline
Practically a Posting Shark

Re: Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

 
0
  #12
Oct 28th, 2008
Originally Posted by VernonDozier View Post
I can't really beat hughv's link, but here's one discussing fruit-flies' evolutionary immunity to DDT.

http://www.terradaily.com/reports/DD...ce_Spread.html

It's a perfect example of natural selection. If you're immune to DDT, you live and pass on the gene. If you're not, you die and you don't pass on the genes which are vulnerable to DDT. Same thing with the penicillin-resistant super-bacteria.

No reason to think human beings don't exhibit the same behavior, except on a lesser scale. I'm sure the 1918 flu epidemic caused us to be a much more resilient species, as did the Bubonic Plague earlier. People with weaker immune systems died and didn't pass their genes on. Those with stronger immune systems survived and had children.
I have no doubt that a species can become immune to a specific virus. But this is not proof of Evolution. According to evolutionists, it takes several thousands of years for a species to make drastic physical changes. For example, a fish to grow legs. Of course legs would not grow perfect initially because that is the nature of deformities, so they would have to be refined through generation to generation. But we are not talking about generation to generation, we are talking about 100s of generations to 100s of generations. And this process happens for every change a species goes through. I'm pretty sure that if this process happened for every single development in every species on the planet that it would be very evident through fossils and there would be no question. You would see steps in the Evolution chain because every single one of these changes requires thousands of years of development and the spawn of millions of species with that same deformity.

Since this the way Evolution works, species would be much more closely related then they are because of the statistical amount of spawn and time required between changes in the physical makeup of a species. You would not see fish and lizards, you would see fish, fish with legs, fish with tails, fish with legs and claws, lizards with fins, lizards with gills, fish with the ability to eat flies by flipping their tongue into the air like a frog, etc... Species and families of species would be much more closely related then they are now and it would be obvious to the standard intelligent human which path in the Evolution chain a species came from and Evolution would in fact be measurable like other scientific theories.

Because it is not so obvious, just saying that because flies and cockroaches can develop immunities is not saying that Evolution is a fact. It's not even coming close.

For this reason, the only difference that I see between Creationism and Evolution is the supernatural aspect, otherwise they are on the same level of improbability.
Last edited by R0bb0b; Oct 28th, 2008 at 5:15 pm.
“Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind.” - Dr. Seuss

-- The documentation is inevitable, you may get away with it for a little while but eventually you too will have to do the deed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,438
Reputation: Ezzaral has much to be proud of Ezzaral has much to be proud of Ezzaral has much to be proud of Ezzaral has much to be proud of Ezzaral has much to be proud of Ezzaral has much to be proud of Ezzaral has much to be proud of Ezzaral has much to be proud of Ezzaral has much to be proud of Ezzaral has much to be proud of 
Solved Threads: 510
Moderator
Featured Poster
Ezzaral's Avatar
Ezzaral Ezzaral is offline Offline
Industrious Poster

Re: Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

 
0
  #13
Oct 28th, 2008
Originally Posted by R0bb0b View Post
For this reason, the only difference that I see between Creationism and Evolution is the supernatural aspect, otherwise they are on the same level of improbability.
Well, there's just a little bit more to it than that:
http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/evo_01
http://www.natcenscied.org/evolution
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...ions#Evolution
http://www.natcenscied.org/creationism
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 16,152
Reputation: jbennet is a name known to all jbennet is a name known to all jbennet is a name known to all jbennet is a name known to all jbennet is a name known to all jbennet is a name known to all 
Solved Threads: 531
Moderator
Featured Poster
jbennet's Avatar
jbennet jbennet is offline Offline
Moderator

Re: Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

 
0
  #14
Oct 28th, 2008
Best argument for evolution: We've seen it happen and verified it many times in other animals like flies, which have lifespans short enough and have enough offspring per generation that we can see it quickly
Take antibiotic resistant bacteria. A random mutation in one bacteria turned out to be beneficial, so it didnt die when all its friends did, therefore it had a competitive edge and managed to outcompete them, hence the problems we now have with antibiotic resistant bacteria.

This is a good example of natural selection. survival of the fittest, and evolution, and its easy to see because said bacteria multiply extremely fast, so the chance of a benificial mutation is quite high.
If i am helpful, please give me reputation points.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,521
Reputation: Lardmeister is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 22
Lardmeister's Avatar
Lardmeister Lardmeister is offline Offline
Posting Virtuoso

Re: Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

 
0
  #15
Oct 29th, 2008
Originally Posted by jbennet View Post
Take antibiotic resistant bacteria. A random mutation in one bacteria turned out to be beneficial, so it didnt die when all its friends did, therefore it had a competitive edge and managed to outcompete them, hence the problems we now have with antibiotic resistant bacteria.

This is a good example of natural selection. survival of the fittest, and evolution, and its easy to see because said bacteria multiply extremely fast, so the chance of a benificial mutation is quite high.
A good example of evolution over a very short time span! You also have to look at evolution over a very large time span, let's say 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000! light years. I propose that even GOD has evolved over such a long time. For worse or better, I don't know.

Note: Yes, that is meant to be a factorial.
Last edited by Lardmeister; Oct 29th, 2008 at 5:02 pm.
I upped my sanitary measures, up yours!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8
Reputation: yunghove is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 0
yunghove yunghove is offline Offline
Newbie Poster

Re: Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

 
0
  #16
Oct 30th, 2008
Originally Posted by Lardmeister View Post
A good example of evolution over a very short time span! You also have to look at evolution over a very large time span, let's say 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000! light years. I propose that even GOD has evolved over such a long time. For worse or better, I don't know.

Note: Yes, that is meant to be a factorial.
Umm, not to be a Dic*, or anything, but Light years isnt measured in time...
Its measured in Distance. I'm confused, Im a cristian, but I beleive in Evolution @_@.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,091
Reputation: hughv is on a distinguished road 
Solved Threads: 87
hughv hughv is offline Offline
Veteran Poster

Re: Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

 
0
  #17
Oct 30th, 2008
This is actually very simple.
The "Theory" of evolution is based on scientifically tested, and testable, evidence.There are flaws, and much remains to be learned, but evolution is a fact, and those who wish to explore the literature will soon come to that conclusion.
Those "against" evolution might just as well be "against" gravity. Over time, natural selection will weed these unfortunates from the gene pool (and the work force) and the rest of us can go about our business.
BS, PH, CIB
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8
Reputation: yunghove is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 0
yunghove yunghove is offline Offline
Newbie Poster

Re: Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

 
0
  #18
Oct 30th, 2008
Originally Posted by hughv View Post
This is actually very simple.
The "Theory" of evolution is based on scientifically tested, and testable, evidence.There are flaws, and much remains to be learned, but evolution is a fact, and those who wish to explore the literature will soon come to that conclusion.
Those "against" evolution might just as well be "against" gravity. Over time, natural selection will weed these unfortunates from the gene pool (and the work force) and the rest of us can go about our business.
Humans evolved(not saying from monkeys, just saying we evolved). Look back maybe 500 years, we didnt have electricity. Humans do evolve. If we didnt evolve, how come were so smart compared to 1000 years ago?

Plus everything is Fact. Fact is something that can be proven.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 16,152
Reputation: jbennet is a name known to all jbennet is a name known to all jbennet is a name known to all jbennet is a name known to all jbennet is a name known to all jbennet is a name known to all 
Solved Threads: 531
Moderator
Featured Poster
jbennet's Avatar
jbennet jbennet is offline Offline
Moderator

Re: Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

 
0
  #19
Oct 30th, 2008
evolution does NOT say that humans evolved from apes. Its a common misconception. What it says is that at some point, they had a commoin ancestor.
If i am helpful, please give me reputation points.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 391
Reputation: steven woodman is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 4
steven woodman's Avatar
steven woodman steven woodman is offline Offline
Posting Whiz

Re: Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

 
0
  #20
Oct 30th, 2008
Thats right jbennet, but at some point every species on earth had a common ancestor.

I havent heard any (decent) arguments against evolution, but I think that would be expected since most people with any amount of education and reason can see the truth. Time = Change, whether it be the mountains on earth, formed through the forces of its core, or the traits we possess, formed through the forces of our core - DNA.
An eye for an eye and the world would be blind.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Reply

This thread is more than three months old.
Perhaps start a new thread instead?
Message:



Similar Threads
Other Threads in the Geeks' Lounge Forum
Thread Tools Search this Thread



About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | DaniWeb | Acceptable Use Policy | RSS Feed

©2003 - 2009 DaniWeb® LLC